Category: Global Positioning System



Russia Issues Grim Report On North American Magnetic Anomaly

Posted by EU Times on Jun 12th, 2014

Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.com

A grim report prepared by Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force Lieutenant-General Viktor Bondarev on the just completed scientific mission of North America carried out by 4 Tupolev Tu-95 strategic aircraft and 2 Ilyushin Il-78 aerial refueling tankers that “electronically swept” for “magnetic anomalies” from Alaska to California warns that a “catastrophic event” may be nearing for this region.

US officials, it should be noted, characterized this purely scientific mission as a “bombing run” that came within 50 miles of California, but which their Air Forces were able to repel by their launching of F-15 fighter jets.

This report, however, states that this scientific mission was necessitated by a “severe mysterious magnetic anomaly” detected by the Kosmos 2473 satellite on 3 June occurring in the Yellowstone region of the Western United States which resulted in what is called an “earthquake swarm.”

Most important to note about the 3 June Yellowstone “magnetic anomaly”, this report continues, are that satellite measurements show it being precipitated by the mysterious earthquake swarm hitting the Brooks Range mountains in Alaska, and which seismologists are still at a loss to explain.

The information relating to the linking of these two “events”, this report says, was further verified by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) magnetic anomaly maps and data for North America showing a strange magnetic “disturbance/ripple” emanating from Brooks Range and ending at Yellowstone on 3 June, both of these areas, it is important to note, being part of the Rocky Mountains that stretch more than 4,830 km (3,000 miles) from the northernmost part of British Columbia, in western Canada, to New Mexico, in the southwestern United States.

Of grave concern to Russian military authorities relating to these “events”, General Bondarev says in his report, was the “catastrophic effect” they had on the advanced “magnetoceptioninertial navigation systems employed by many US-NATO-Russian warplanes which use these highly sophisticated aircraft flight devices.

Though no Russia military aircraft were near the “disturbed magnetic zone” emanating our from Yellowstone on 3 June, this report says, two US military aircraft were at its “boundaries” in the Southern California region on 4 June while this “event” was still “active” causing them both to crash.

The two US fighter jets crashing on 4 June, this report continues, were identified as a US Navy F-A-183 that went down when the pilot was attempting to land aboard the carrier Carl Vinson, and a US Marine Harrier AV-8B jet that crashed into a residential community in Imperial, about 90 miles east of San Diego, both of them occurring within hours of each other.

This report notes that no civilian aircraft would have been affected by this “magnetic anomaly” as only the most advanced military aircraft employ these “geomagnetic-satellite” coordinated flight systems which enable them to “hug the terrain” not unlike the magnetic systems used by birds and insects to navigate.

Russian concerns relating to “magnetic anomalies”, it is important to note, are related to the rapidly shifting north magnetic pole which since 2005 has been moving at a rate of 40 kilometers (25 miles) a year from Arctic Canada toward Siberia.

Frightening independent research from last year (2013) further warns that this shift is still picking up speed and according to this researcher should reach Siberia in at least within 2 years. [See video HERE (banned in US)]

One of the effects of the rapidly shifting magnetic north pole being noticed the most, this report notes, are the airport runway systems being disrupted because of it, and as we can read one such 2011 example which occurred in the US:

“Tampa International Airport was forced to readjust its runways Thursday to account for the movement of the Earth’s magnetic fields, information that pilots rely upon to navigate planes. Thanks to the fluctuations in the force, the airport has closed its primary runway until Jan. 13 to change taxiway signs to account for the shift, the Federal Aviation Administration said.

The poles are generated by movements within the Earth’s inner and outer cores, though the exact process isn’t exactly understood. They’re also constantly in flux, moving a few degrees every year, but the changes are almost never of such a magnitude that runways require adjusting, said Paul Takemoto, a spokesman for the FAA.”

The most chilling aspects of General Bondarev’s report relating to these “events” are the equations he uses in postulating that what is now occurring in North America with these “mysterious magnetic anomalies” occurring over a large expanse of the Rocky Mountains, and when combined with the rapidly shifting magnetic north pole and growing evidence of global climate change, give “huge credibility” to what is called “The Expanding Earth Theory”.

The expanding Earth or growing Earth hypothesis asserts that the position and relative movement of continents is at least partially due to the volume of Earth increasing and stands in contrast to that of plate tectonics, but which new findings relating to “aether theories” and dark matter, General Bondarev summarizes, means “grave consideration” must be given to the words of University of California, Davis, cosmologist Dr. Andreas Albrecht who warned: “We’ve hit some really profound problems with cosmology Ð with dark matter and dark energy, that tells us we have to rethink fundamental physics and try something new.

Or in simple terms, this report ends, “We may be on the verge of a catastrophic North American “event” that could possibly change the world forever, we should be prepared.”

YELLOWSTONE ERUPTION OF MEGAVOLCANO

YELLOWSTONE ERUPTION OF MÉGAVOLCAN

Published June 9, 2014 | by Team Pleinsfeux

The American government  is working on a secret escape plan in case of a mega volcano eruption at Yellowstone ?

  • Conspiracy theorists claim that American citizens could be moved to Australia, Brazil and   Argentina.

  • The last eruption may have occurred there 70,000 years.

  • The volcano could be reclassified as “off”, despite the fact that researchers have recently found that it is 2.5 times larger than they thought.

On May 8, 2014

It has been suggested that millions of citizens of the United States could end up in Brazil, Australia or Argentina if the Yellowstone supervolcano eruption happened.

The news site “Praag” edited in South Africa, argues that the African National Congress would have been offered $ 10 billion a year for 10 years for the construction of temporary housing for Americans if rash, in this As part of the development of current emergency plans.

Bloggers and conspiracy theorists have spent weeks discussing these plans since the videos of animals fleeing the region have been revealed, although park rangers said they were actually frightened by tourists.

PREVIOUS KICKS

  1. According to U.S. Geological Survey, there were three major eruptions of Yellowstone supervolcano over the past million years.

  2. The first would have a league there are about 2.1 million years, while the second took place there 1.3 million years.

  3. The last major eruption took place there 640.000 years.

“It was a kind of spring day, and they were frisky. Contrary to online reports, this is an all-in-natural and not the end of the world phenomenon,” said the spokeswoman, Amy Bartlett.

If the largest volcano in the world was rash, most of the United States would be covered with ashes. However, researchers say there are no signs of an imminent eruption.

“The chance of that happening in our lives is extremely insignificant,” said Peter Cervelli, deputy director for science and technology at the Science Center of the volcanoes of the “United States Geological Survey,” California.

A recent study on the important supervolcano of Yellowstone National Park in the United States, researchers have recently found to be 2.5 times larger than they thought, could actually be dead very soon.

The researchers analyzed the water and gas, and believe that it could already be on its deathbed.

According to Ken Sims, of the University of Wyoming, air and water samples taken from the largest volcano in the world suggests that it might be dying.

The team examined the acidity in water samples and radon in the air as part of their study on the status of Yellowstone.

At Yellowstone, as with other volcanoes, some scientists theorize that the earth’s crust fractures and cracks in a concentric pattern, also known as fractures rings. At some point, these cracks reach the magma reservoir and release the pressure, and the volcano explodes. The enormous amount of released material causes the collapse of the volcano in a huge crater, a caldera.

They also analyzed how water and gas mix in the amount of land in order to improve methods of predicting eruptions and to identify the most volatile areas of the park.

Currently, the park is classified as dormant, as there would have been no eruption since 70,000 years.

If it becomes an extinct volcano, it will never erupt again.

In early November, a team of researchers from the University of Wyoming, led by Ken Sims, has distributed tarpaulins on the snowy ground near the white terraces, outside of “Mammoth Hot Springs” where pools are stacked like small mountains filled with crystal clear water.

“I got radium,” said Ken Sims, a professor of geology and geophysics of the “University of Wyoming and National Geographic Explorer.”

“We should take samples there. “

Ken Sims knelt beside a mound delicate formations and released their machines boxes backpack: There was a radon detector with lights and a recorder to tape measures, a detector pH to record acid levels.

Both should help me learn how water and gas interact.

“It looks like boiling,” said Ken Sims. “But in fact, it is steam or CO2. “

The area is of outstanding natural beauty: The Yellowstone caldera in Wyoming is the largest super-volcano in the world.

Ken Sims studied the rate at which water and gas mix ascending to the surface.

His research could eventually help scientists understand what causes eruptions of steam.

If they know how fast steam and water interact in the park, they could better predict when an area becomes more volatile.

Despite fears that the supervolcano may be off, the park is one of the research laboratories of the most famous in the world, attracting internationally renowned scientists to study everything from earthquakes to the origins of life, until the power of this volcano lies beneath the soil.

“Yellowstone is so superior in many ways, that sometimes you cry responses to what is happening elsewhere,” said Jacob Lowenstern, scientist in charge of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory.

The unique park has a quagmire of molten rocks and crystals as the first national park in the country 40 miles (64 km.) Long molten rocks and crystals.

Instead of a cone with a hole, the caldera is an interconnected maze of gas and water covering nearly 60 miles (about 96 km.) In the northwestern corner of Wyoming with parts in Montana and Idaho.

More than 10,000 pots of mud, rivers and geysers boiling, act as valves to release pressure of nature, preventing the heated exploding monster.

And, they move.

“Mammoth Terraces” in the northern part of the park can grow vertically up to 3 meters per year and extend horizontally further.

The rise of the water dissolved calcium in the surface and the CO2 bubble is left behind and the white calcium carbonate.

The terraces rise until the vents become blocked and the gas pressure forces the opening of a weakness elsewhere.

“The intense heat of the Yellowstone volcano is driving the hydrothermal system,” said Henry Heasler, geologist of the park.

“It gets hot and rises, and the magma chamber, or reservoir, is at a relatively shallow depth. “


 

Security, Privacy Experts Testify To Congress On Spy Drones

Lobbyists attempt to convince Congress that unmanned vehicles over US pose no threat

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
July 19, 2012

Security and privacy experts have today given testimony to a congressional hearing on the anticipated increased use of unmanned drones in US airspace.

Several important issues were raised during the House Homeland Security Oversight Subcommittee hearing “Using Unmanned Aerial Systems Within the Homeland: Security Game Changer?”

The chairman of the homeland security subcommittee, U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, noted that unmanned aerial systems are a boost to military and border control operations, but their growing use concerns many citizens.

“These systems are now being used in the United States by law enforcement, government agencies and even academic institutions,” McCaul said in a statement. “Some Americans worry such systems will become invasive ‘eyes-in-the-sky’. Others say domestic drones will eventually be armed. However, no Federal agency is taking responsibility for creating comprehensive policies and regulations concerning the use of these systems domestically.

“Additionally, vulnerabilities to ‘drone’ hackers exist, as recently demonstrated by researchers at the University of Texas, raising concerns these vehicles could be commandeered by terrorists or others with ill intent. Our hearing will examine DHS’s role in the domestic use of unmanned aerial systems and determine the extent to which the Department is prepared to ensure oversight of domestic drones.”

In addition, University of Texas Professor Todd Humphreys testified about how his teamrecently demonstrated how to “spoof” a sophisticated drone using relatively basic components and take full control of the vehicle.

Humphreys built an advanced spoofer at a cost of just $1000, and has successfully infiltrated the GPS systems of several drones. He has demonstrated to Homeland Security and FAA officials that all he has to do is send a more powerful signal to the drone than it is receiving from an orbiting satellite and he can make the vehicle do anything he commands.

Humphreys has previously noted that he is worried about drones being hijacked and used as weapons, noting that they could be purposefully crashed into other planes and buildings.

Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) CEO Michael Toscano, essentially a lobbyists for drone manufacturers, said in prepared testimony that hacking a unmanned aerial vehicle is “outside the capability of any average American citizen” and very difficult to pull off in real-world conditions.

“To successfully spoof a GPS signal, one must have the equipment and capability to broadcast a counterfeit signal at a high enough power level to overpower the GPS signals emanating from more than 20 satellites in orbit around the earth…” The testimony reads.

“If the target vehicle is not in close proximity to the spoofing device, this requires a detection system such as radar. Meanwhile, custom software is needed to make adjustments to the target vehicle’s course,” the testimony continues.

On the second panel at today’s congressional hearing, Amie Stepanovich of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) testified regarding the privacy implications of domestic drone use. She was joined by Gerald Dillingham Director of Civil Aviation for GAO, and Chief Deputy William McDaniel of the Montgomery County (TX) Sheriff’s Office, that has said that it is considering using rubber bullets and tear gas on its unmanned drone.

In February, EPIC, joined by over 100 prominent privacy watchdog groups, organizations, experts, and members of the public, petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on the proposed increase in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in the skies above the US.

Over 30 rights groups, including The American Civil Liberties Union and The Bill of Rights Defense Committee are demanding that the FAA hold a rulemaking session to consider the privacy and safety threats posed by the increased use of drones.

The Agency has not yet responded to the petition or addressed privacy concerns. The petition recommends that the FAA develop privacy rules, that DHS conduct a privacy assessment, and that Congress establish new privacy safeguards.

The federal government is in the process of rolling out new rules on the use of the unmanned drones, with the FAA announcing procedures will “streamline” the process through which government agencies, including local law enforcement, receive licenses to operate the aircraft.

Congress recently passed legislation paving the way for what the FAA predicts will be somewhere in the region of 30,000 drones in operation in US skies by 2020.

Critics have warned that the FAA has not acted to establish any safeguards whatsoever, and that congress is not holding the agency to account.

In addition, A recently uncovered Air Force document circumvents laws and clear the way for the Pentagon to use drones to monitor the activities of Americans.

The Department of Defense has also recently been caught in blatant lies concerning the use of drones in domestic airspace.

Manufacturers of drones, almost exclusively defense contractors, have spent $2.3 million so far on lobbying Congress to open up US airspace.

Virginia Lawmaker Looks To Strictly Regulate Spy Drones

Mandates that unauthorized images taken by unmanned planes be destroyed

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
July 19, 2012

A Virginia Delegate is to introduce legislation that he says will enforce tight regulations on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in the state.

C. Todd Gilbert (R) has joined forces with the ACLU, releasing a joint statement that lays out their intentions to “strictly” oversee the rollout of drones.

“Both the ACLU and I believe, as do many Virginians across the political spectrum, that the use of drones by police and other government agencies should be strictly controlled by state laws that protect the privacy and civil rights of all Virginia residents,” Gilbert said.

“I will be introducing legislation in the 2013 General Assembly Session to i) prohibit the use of drones by law enforcement unless a warrant has been issued; ii) require that policies and procedures for the use of drones be adopted by legislative bodies in open meetings; iii) provide for public monitoring and accountability; and iv) mandate that pictures of individuals acquired by drones be destroyed unless they are part of an authorized investigation.” the statement reads.

Claire Guthrie Gastañaga, executive director of the Virginia ACLU, echoed Delegate Gilbert’s remarks:

“Delegate Gilbert is right to be concerned about the possibility that, without new laws, this new and increasingly inexpensive technology will be used in a manner that will violate the fundamental right to be free from unreasonable searches and will have a chilling effect on the First Amendment rights of Virginians to assemble peaceably and speak freely. We are proud to be working with Delegate Gilbert to build a coalition in favor of the legislation he will introduce — a coalition that will bring together diverse voices from across the Commonwealth.”

The Governor of Virginia, Bob McDonnell, is on the record saying he endorses the use of drones domestically for police surveillance.

During a recent interview on WTOP radio’s “Ask the Governor” program, McDonnell stated:

“I think it’s great. I think we ought to be using technology to make law enforcement more productive — it cuts down on manpower in the air — and more safe. That’s why we use it on the battlefield.”

“We need to address civil liberties like privacy, but I believe if you’re keeping police officers safe, making it more productive and saving money … it’s absolutely the right thing to do.” McDonnell added.

Delegate Gilbert’s bill, which will now work its way through the legislature, outlines the following restrictions and notices on drone use by the government and law enforcement in Virginia:

• Usage restrictions. Drones should be subject to strict regulation to ensure that their use by government, law enforcement, and private entities does not trample individual privacy rights. For example, legislation should prohibit the use of drones for indiscriminate mass surveillance or for monitoring protected First Amendment activities. In general, legislation should ban all government and government-sponsored use of drones except where:

there are specific and stated reasons to believe that a drone will collect evidence relating to a specific instance of criminal wrongdoing and where the government has obtained a warrant based on probable cause; or

there is a geographically confined, time-limited emergency situation in which particular people’s lives are at risk, such as a fire, hostage crisis, or land- or water-based search and rescue operation; or

the drone is used for reasonable non-law enforcement purposes by non-law enforcement agencies, where privacy will not be substantially affected, such as geological inspections or environmental surveys, and where the surveillance will not be used for secondary law enforcement purposes or enforcement of administrative regulations.

• Image retention restrictions. Images of identifiable individuals captured by aerial surveillance technologies should not be retained or shared unless there is reasonable suspicion that the images contain evidence of criminal activity or are relevant to an ongoing investigation or pending criminal trial.

• Public notice. The policies and procedures for the use of aerial surveillance technologies should be explicit, written, and public. While it is legitimate for the police to keep the details of particular investigations confidential, overall policies governing deployment of drones — including the privacy tradeoffs they may entail — are a public matter that should be subject to public oversight and accountability.

• Democratic control. Policy decisions regarding the purchase and deployment of drones should be democratically decided by appropriate legislative bodies (e.g., city councils, county boards, or the General Assembly) based on publicly available information and in open meetings — not made administratively by police departments or other law enforcement or regulatory agencies (e.g., through receipt of federal grants, purchasing decisions, or by inclusion in the general orders of law enforcement agencies).

• Auditing and effectiveness tracking. Public agencies should not invest in drones without a clear, systematic, and public examination of the costs and benefits involved. If aerial surveillance technology is deployed, independent audits should track the use of drones by all government agencies, so that all Virginians can tell generally how and how often they are being used, whether their use is consistent with the original rationale for their deployment and whether they represent a worthwhile public expenditure.

 

%d bloggers like this: