Category: Alex Jones


Bankers Declare U.S. & Europe Conquered

World government now an open secret

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Thursday, July 19, 2012

A recent CNBC clip in which financial analysts admit to viewers that America is under the control of a group of central bankers who are building a world government is a damning insight into how the establishment has dispensed with any pretense of trying to hide their agenda as it is finalized.

During the video, the host asks guests, “Do we all work for central bankers – is this global governance at last – is it one world – the central bankers in charge….aren’t we all just living and dying for what the central banks do?”

“To answer your question, we are absolutely slaves to central banks,” responds the guest.

“We beholden to what central bankers and policy makers do rather than the fundamentals in the economy,” adds another.

This is just one of a deluge of examples where it is now being thrown in our faces that a banking elite is building a world government at the expense of the American people.

From treating the issue as a “conspiracy theory” for decades, the establishment is now tearing away the veil in an effort to force Americans to blithely accept what has been planned all along.

A global government is now being forcefully pushed as the “solution” to all manner of problems, but specifically in relation to financial crises. We are being brainwashed to accept the premise that centralized power in the hands of a tiny elite is the only recourse, and that a one world currency is inevitable.

At the height of the last economic crisis, Bilderberg member and Financial Times columnist Gideon Rachman argued that “everything is in place” for a dictatorial world government to be imposed by a technocratic elite.

Rachman’s 2008 call for authoritarian technocrats to be put in charge of the global economy in preparation for the official birth of global government is now well on its way to completion, with the economies of France, Ireland, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Greece, along with the IMF and the European Central Bank, all under Goldman Sachs banker occupation.

These technocrats have not been bashful in openly announcing what they are doing.

Upon his selection to become EU President in 2009, Herman Van Rompuy announced that the financial crisis and efforts to combat global warming were designed to precede “the global management of our planet.” He also declared 2009 to be “the first year of global governance.”

In the same year, Van Rompuy was joined by the Pope who also called for a “world political authority” to manage the global economy.

World Bank President and Bilderberg elitist Robert Zoellick also openly admitted the plan to eliminate national sovereignty and impose a global government during a speech on the eve of the G20 summit.

Calls for a one world currency to be a key component of global governance have been consistent.

In 2000 speech, member of the executive board of the ECB, Sirkka Hämäläinen stated, “In conclusion, I should like to come back to Paul Volcker’s prophecy. He might be right, and we might one day have a single world currency. Maybe European integration, in the same way as any other regional integration, could be seen as a step towards the ideal situation of a fully integrated world.”

In a 2010 speech to the CFR, former president of the ECB Jean-Claude Trichet made it clear that the Global Economy Meeting (GEM), which meets at the BIS (Bank of International Settlements) headquarters in Basel would “become the prime group for global governance among central banks.”

Trichet added that the BIS meetings were ensuring that “the system is moving decisively towards genuine global governance.”


Trichet went on to define how global governance would operate.

“There are numerous definitions of global governance. In the economic and financial sphere I will propose that global governance comprehends not only the constellation of supranational institutions – including the international financial institutions – but also the informal groupings that have progressively emerged at the global level. Those informal forums (G7, G10, G20, etc.) are key in improving global coordination in all the areas where decision making processes remain national – whether in helping to work out agreed prudential standards and codes or to facilitate where appropriate, the coordination of economic macro-policies.”

Numerous other members of the political establishment have openly expressed the agenda to create global government. not only in response to the financial crisis but also as an answer to man-made climate change.

In 2009, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon admitted that carbon taxes levied in the name of abating global warming would be collected by a world body.

“We will establish a global governance structure to monitor and manage the implementation of this,” he stated.

In a New York Times editorial entitled “We Can Do It,” Ki-moon also wrote that efforts to impose restrictions on CO2 emissions, “Must include an equitable global governance structure.”

Fellow globalist and environmentalist David De Mayer Rothschild also disclosed the agenda for global governancein an interview with Bloomberg news.

“It’s past the point of talking. We know historically that the global governance sort of agenda to these issues is very hard to… with all the best intentions it’s very hard to actually activate.” Rothschild noted.

Similarly, Al Gore said in a 2009 speech that attempts to regulate CO2 emissions would be driven through “global governance and global agreements.”

al-gore-joker nwo

A 2010 UN blueprint for putting the organization back at the forefront of global governance alarmingly revealed the agenda to re-brand global warming as “overpopulation” as a means of dismantling the middle classes while using “global redistribution of wealth” and increased immigration to reinvigorate the pursuit of a one world government.

Bureaucrats at the 2011 UN Climate Summit in Durban outlined plans for the most draconian, harebrained and madcap climate change treaty ever produced, under which the west would be mandated to respect “the rights of Mother Earth” by paying a “climate debt” which would act as a slush fund for bankrolling an all-powerful world government.

Earlier this year a Scientific American article entitled Effective World Government Will Be Needed to Stave Off Climate Catastrophe argued that global management of the planet was the only means of combating global warming.

Although the agenda for global government is now bearing its teeth with little regard for subtleness or stealth, the following quotes stretching back over the last several decades prove that the plan has been long in the works.

“Today America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Henry Kissinger

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and their great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
David Rockefeller

BilDR400 (1)

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.”
Strobe Talbot

“We need a global New Deal — a grand bargain between the countries and continents of this world.”
Gordon Brown

“It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order. Pat Robertson has written in a book a few years ago that we should have a world government, but only when the Messiah arrives. He wrote, literally, any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the devil. Well, join me. I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan.”
Walter Cronkite

“This is global governance in the making. But we must agree, and agree to a binding commitment.”
George Papandreou, former Prime Minister of Greece

“For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance. From the very earliest age, we should make environmental awareness a major theme of education and a major theme of political debate, until respect for the environment comes to be as fundamental as safeguarding our rights and freedoms. By acting together, by building this unprecedented instrument, the first component of an authentic global governance, we are working for dialogue and peace.”
Jacques Chirac

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
David Rockefeller, from his own book, Memoirs.





Trendy Alert: How The Global Elite Constructed An Army Of Agenda 21 Advocates

Posted on July 31, 2012 | Leave a comment

Jurriaan Maessen
July 31, 2012

There is a new species of man prancing around upon the world stage. Suddenly, quite unannounced, this bizarre typology appeared, comparable to… well, nothing really. It is a remarkable creature, immediately recognizable by a certain androgynous streak running along all its features: a sheep-like nothingness, combined with an ounce of fanatical malice, dominating the rest of its general outward appearance. I say androgynous, because this new species hardly conforms to anything resembling the male- nor does it do to qualify it as female: an analogy which, as Alex Jones pointed out, is an insult to women. You see them, the trendies, popping up more and more these days, leaving us with a sense of what can only be described as sheer bewilderment. Although “trendy” is the term we may use to adequately describe this species, they comfortably classify themselves under the umbrella-term “millennial”. The following clip from the Alex Jones Show adequately expresses the nastiness of the phenomenon:

If we had to index this new family in the great house of the human race, one might classify it under Homo Trendyaris- or Homo Idiotis, or whatever name for that matter that may be applied to separate this individual from the larger, human family. The trendy, we have come to understand, is a result of decade-long, unrelenting disinformation-campaigns on the very young- which has produced a very sickening example of how man may be perverted beyond recognition if bombarded long enough with thorough globalist propaganda. It is a crime, really. The trendy’s mind has clearly from a very early age on been seriously knocked out of alignment, and subsequently molded in such a form as to be practically unrecognizable from anything resembling the human as we know him. If you want to visualize the trendy, sketch yourself a picture-postcard of an ordinary human- like the one depicted in biology textbooks denoting the classic male; shrink this image in length and width to about one half of its original size- shrink the neck even more until it compares to that of no more than an averaged-sized chicken- and then add to this all the complexities and wonderful mysteries inherent to humans in general … only to then deduct these things altogether. What remains is a creature that has a distinct Gollum-like feel to it: a hollow facade, in other words, weak of mind and body.

This sickly new creation is a disturbing blueprint of the futuristic “man” as envisioned by the global elite. To learn of how the trendy has been wrought into being, we must look at the latest generations of globalist royalty. For it is they, the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, who may be held responsible for the most subtle and consistent breeding-programs ever injected into society’s bloodstream. Subtle because of the absence of a straightforward eugenic intervention, and consistent because of the incremental nature of the propaganda onslaught.

David Mayor de Rothschild

In an unbelievable display of shamelessness, the youngest son of sir Evelyn de Rothschild claims that being heir to the Rothschild-fortune somehow makes it more unlikely that he should convince people to ‘go green’. Several news outlets have reported on a television series presented by David Mayor de Rothschild himself, pointing at the dangers of ‘global warming’ and its supposed effects on the earths ecosystem as he sails around the globe, promoting his cause on a boat made of plastic bottles and recycled waste. The young Rothschild may have painted the family crest green, underneath the red is still shimmering through.

On April 17 2009 the New York Times ran a story about David Mayor de Rothschild and his television debut “Eco Trip: The Real Cost of Living”. In the article the journalist cancels all professional reservations surrendering himself mindlessly over to Rothschild’s geographical zigzagging adventures and ecological photo-ops. As we have come to expect from the New York Times, even the pretext of thinking is abandoned as the global warming-myth is presented as a well-proven fact and its advocates are sprinkled with shining star- and gold dust. But let’s not forget: not long after this particular journalistic facade the Climategate scandal erupted like a carbon dioxide-laden volcano, blowing away a generation of lies and covering it with a thick layer of ash.

Starting out by marveling over David Mayor the Rothschild’s past globetrotting adventures “across Greenland’s shrinking icecaps”, the journalist wonders aloud how on earth it is possible for an offspring of the infamous banking family to protect Gaia from the evil oil-drillers.

“It’s one of those weird things”, Rothschild said in response. “(Being a Rothschild) has given me a lot of opportunities, but I think I always have to work harder too.”

A couple of days before the New York Times published their deceptive little panegyric, an article about De Rothschild’s ventures appeared in the Guardian’s environment-section, pointing out that David de Rothschild “belongs to the country’s leading ‘eco-toffs’, those young men and women who use their inherited wealth to promote environmental causes.”

By projecting an image of himself as a rich man’s kid drifting away from his predestined path to choose a life of self-inflicted hardship, De Rothschild casually leaves out the fact that his activities are actually perfectly consistent with his family’s long-time ambitions. As so often is the case, we must peel off multiple layers of deception to arrive at the rotten apple-core. De Rothschild’s crusade against “climate change” (these words cannot be crammed in between quotes thick enough to encapsulate this deception) is not despite of his upbringing- on the contrary: it fits in perfectly with his families age-old trickery, to create and promote a crisis, let it rage for a while and then generously bring out the solution in favour of the globalist agenda. And as the young Rothschild’s environmental enterprises show, the methodology is still very much alive.

Besides making television series for the young, he specializes in directing the propaganda towards the very young. In an attempt at brainwashing the very young, De Rothschild wrote a children’s book on climate change- a fairy tale really- because “a range of learning opportunities connect children with nature, inspire proactive global citizenship and make learning an adventure.” The message is clear: forget your family, forget your tribe- become good global citizens instead. Murmuring subliminally we hear the emperor from Star Wars whispering: “Give in to the dark side..”

It was not a month before the New York Times article appeared about David de Rothschild’s travels, the PR Newswire announced that “Rothschild Australia and E3 International are set to become key players in the international carbon credit trading market, an emerging commodity market that analysts estimate could be worth up to US$150 billion by 2012.” Such an additional fact would go completely over a trendy’s head, by the way.

Conveniently leaving out that the ancient family for centuries worked to consolidate control over international finance, the website Rothschild.Com brags: “Rothschild has been at the centre of the world’s financial markets for over 200 years. It ranks amongst the world’s largest privately-owned banks.” A couple of paragraphs later the website goes on to say that “Rothschild is committed to the pursuit of excellence, and for this reason concentrates on sectors and markets in which it can excel.”

Indeed. As the many carbon credit schemes by the internationalist family clearly illustrate, their members are all too eager to point at the dangers of climate change, and even more eager to make huge profits out of the generated fear. David Mayor de Rothschild is certainly not a rogue descendant of the family, sailing of into the deep blue as he denounces his family’s global ambitions; he is actually a most loyal member, actively promoting its interests with a wink and a smile as he sells his cool aid to the youngest of the young.

David Rockefeller Jr.

Speaking of boating trips to “promote awareness on climate change”, the youngest son of David Rockefeller, David Rockefeller Jr., has pranced around on the world’s oceans for many a year on his million dollar luxury yard- one of his million dollar luxury yards, that is. In this particular 2010 article, Rockefeller doubles back on the scientific legitimacy of the entire thing- as so many of them were forced to do since the hoax obviously imploded for all the world to see.

“Regardless of the facts of climate change, the oceans are in trouble”, Rockefeller said. “I don’t think our concerns hang just from the tree of climate change.”

Interesting to note that Rockefeller, providing his resume to the author, stressed that he is a proud member of the Bohemian Club. A very bold admission- which was then penned down by a completely unsuspecting journalist who probably didn’t give it another thought, thinking perhaps that it was some innocent semi-elitist skiing resort. This is a good example of how members of the global elite, just for the hell of it, admit to being part of a secret cabal. They cannot help themselves. Rockefeller is also saying that the science doesn’t even matter and people should conform to the UN’s “sustainability” agenda for the sake of the agenda itself. The term “sustainability” should be interpreted for the euphemism that it is: all depopulation policies, in the making for many decades, assembled under the umbrella of Agenda 21: a post-eugenic agenda created by the very same families now pleasure-cruising around the planet for PR purposes.

The Sierra Club, calling Rockefeller a “trendsetter”, did a Q&A with the billionaire and brought up the subject of population. Musing on the good old days, when his great grandfather built his empire, Rockefeller added:

“We’ve added 5 billion people to the planet in the past century, and that has been the biggest factor in environmental degradation.”

Justin Rockefeller

In the 21st century, the son of US Senator Jay Rockefeller, is also planting the seeds of trendyism into the absorbent soil of young, naïve minds. Justin Rockefeller, a young and fanatic branch from the Rockefeller tree, has pledged his love for his family’s Population Council.

“I proudly support the Population Council because it efficiently improves the lives of young people around the world.”, little Justin Rockefeller said.

“Population challenges—not just the number of people but the quality of their lives—lie at the heart of many of the world’s great challenges, such as poverty alleviation, climate change, and demand for energy.”, Rockefeller continued.

As co-founder of an organization called GenerationEngage, Justin is one of the people responsible for the emergence of the current-day trendy. And he has full establishment backing.

In his biography, young Justin brags:

“Notable GenerationEngage participants include, among others: Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich, Al Gore, Barack Obama, Chuck Hagel, Hillary Clinton, Colin Powell, John Edwards, Nancy Pelosi, Coretta Scott King, Stephen Breyer, Peggy Noonan, Ted Sorensen, Bill Safire, John C. Whitehead, and Spike Lee.”

“We’re targeting young people who aren’t in college.”, Rockefeller confided to New York News & Features. “We hope to hire young community leaders in every state to do things like identify local hot spots—Internet cafés, bars, pool halls—and turn them into places where people talk politics.”

In 2007 the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation stepped in with a bag of money and an agenda, creating an organization of “Climate Precinct Captains” called 1Sky. These “Climate Captains” were first given a good dose of climate change propaganda and were then let loose to spread the good message from door to door. 1Sky is only one out of many “environmental units” groping around the land with full financial backing by calculating globalists and aristocratic transnationalists.

On the “action page” of 1Sky.Org the organization tried to add the young and susceptible inside their ranks by asking them to “become a 1Sky Climate Precinct Captain.”

Playing into children’s inherent insecurities, the website reassures them: “You won’t be alone: you’ll be part of a nationwide network of 1Sky Climate Precinct Captains in each of the approximately 300,000 electoral precincts nationwide, working to make a difference. We’ll make sure you have all the materials you need: training information, how-to guides, materials such as posters, flyers and more.”

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund’s program director for Sustainable Development Michael Northrop commented on their cash-injection into 1Sky, explaining quite truthfully that as far as the Fund is concerned, environmentalism is just a means to an end:

“It has always been much more than an environmental issue for us and explains why we have consistently supported efforts to take the global warming out of the green box in which it has found itself confined. By definition, the notion of sustainable development requires thinking outside the green box because it understands that environmental protection must be integrated with economic and social development. It proposes not only a green agenda to protect ecosystems but also a related human development agenda.”

As we know, ‘human development’ is nothing more than the adjusted and more acceptable term for that old and favorite toy of the elite, eugenics. As evidence of their transformational accomplishments, Northrop points to the reach of their annual grants to “green” movements and other organizations:

“Our grants database provides details on how the RBF has played a role in fostering this change. The Fund has supported groups that have carried the message of sustainable development to the business community, to investors, to people of faith, to the military, to athletes, to architects and builders, to governors, to mayors, and to young people (…). For further evidence of the converging climate conversation, witness what some of the largest banks in the world are doing. Three of them- Citibank, JP Morgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley- together announced standards for the financing of new coal-fired power plants in a deal struck with utilities and environmental groups.”

The example of 1Sky indicates that a new generation of Agenda 21 advocates is consciously being bred into existence with the help of prolonged and extensive propaganda efforts (man=bad, earth=good, therefore: man should die). The product of this campaign is the trendy, which may be considered to be the purest antithesis of the man as he was from the emergence of Homo Sapiens Sapiens up and to the end of the 20st century. While men and women inherently have a desire to protect themselves and their families, the trendy has learned to disregard all these things: not out of any sense of non-conformity, by the way, or otherwise reactionary impulse. It is from an absence of recognition of oneself, a lack of connection with the tribe, which makes the trendy eventually cry at the top of its longs: “slavery is sexy; constricting nation-states is cool!”. And we have the global elite to thank for this.



Robotics Professor Warns Drones Will “Lead To A Sanitised Factory Of Slaughter”

We are witnessing the beginning of “the industrial revolution of war”

Steve Watson
Aug 3, 2012

A prominent artificial intelligence expert has urged that president Obama is setting a horrendous precedent by embracing drone technology as a means of covert warfare.

Professor Noel Sharkey of Sheffield University, penned a piece in The Guardian today that slams the use of missile strikes using unmanned ariel vehicles, warning that what we are seeing is just the beginning of “the industrial revolution of war.”

Sharkey notes that the CIA is thought to have killed anywhere up to 1035 civilians in drone strikes outside of legitimate war zones in the last eight years, including 200 children.

“Who in their right mind would give a powerful unmanned air force to a covert organisation with such a track record for unaccountable and illegal killing?” the professor asks.

“Obama is establishing a dangerous precedent that is, at best, legally questionable in a world where more than 50 countries are acquiring the technology.” he adds.

Sharkey warns that in a modern day arms race, other countries such as Israel, India, Russia and especially China are racing to develop and export armed attack drones.

“Given the 10-year spate of CIA drone strikes, what can be said when other countries use drone strikes against perceived threats in other states?” Sharkey asks.

Sharkey, a founding member of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control (ICRAC), also noted that current drones are “like the Wright brothers’ prototypes compared to what’s coming next.”

“Here is where the real danger resides: automated killing as the final step in the industrial revolution of war – a clean factory of slaughter with no physical blood on our hands and none of our own side killed.” he writes, noting that automated drones have been under development since at least 2004.

“We have records of civilian casualties, including numerous children, from drone strikes when there are humans watching on computer screens and deciding when to fire.” Sharkey notes. “Think how much worse it will be when drones deal death automatically. Is this really a technology we want the secret intelligence services of the world to control?”

Professor Sharkey previously appeared on the Alex Jones Show in 2008, when he warned that the world was sleepwalking into a potentially lethal technocracy and called for safeguards on such technology to be put into place.

“If you have an autonomous robot then it’s going to make decisions who to kill, when to kill and where to kill them.” Sharkey stated at the time. “The scary thing is that the reason this has to happen is because of mission complexity and also so that when there’s a problem with communications you can send a robot in with no communication and it will decide who to kill, and that is really worrying to me.” the professor said.

“The one thing I try to get across to policy makers is that there is this kind of mythical artificial intelligence, every time killer robots are mentioned people start talking about Terminator and ‘Skynet’ and all this stuff that’s really fairytales, and if they were like that it would be better, because what you’ve got here is like a washing machine. This is a dumb stupid machine, and then you are going to give it the decision to kill people, it’s just ridiculous.” Sharkey told listeners.

As we noted this week, a new 62 feet long autonomous drone called the X-47B is set to become an integral part of the Navy’s Unmanned Carrier Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike System (UCLASS).

The new drone was unveiled during its first public test flight over Chesapeake Bay this week. The craft was airborne for 35 minutes and reached an altitude of 7,500 feet, traveling at 207 mph.

The Navy wants to eventually have the aircraft take off and land onto an aircraft carrier hundreds of miles away, all with just the click of a mouse. This would make it the only craft of its kind to have that ability.

The drone is controlled by an onboard Control Display Unit which, it is said, can independently think for itself, plot course corrections, react to unforeseen contingencies, and chart new directions.

Meanwhile, as the use of drones domestically in the US explodes, another dangerous precedent has been set this week with a North Dakota court approving the use of drones to help arrest citizens on US soil.

District Judge Joel Medd denied a request to dismiss charges against Rodney Brossart, who was arrested after law enforcement resorted to using a Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to inspect his property, according to court documents obtained by US News.


%d bloggers like this: