Quark liquid: best cosmic explosive
Mankind has opened the first factory of strange liquid. In 2015 will reach enough energy to produce massive amounts of quark condensates and possibly black holes (disregard dates in videos, as they were done before CERN delayed till 2015 its opening at full potency):
During 5 years, a small group of ethic physicists and scientists of the field of complexity and theory of information (notably Mr. Rossler, founder of chaos theory; this writer, who found the mathematical formalism of general systems science; Eric Penrose, a mathematician, the scion of a family of well known british physicists and Walter Wagner, a safety officer in the most prestigious center of accelerators in America at Livermore), tried to rise awareness of those facts, but the ‘military-industrial complex’ – yes that old topic in top form these days, made a big press campaign, to deviate the ‘issue’ to ad hominem campaigns and ‘big smiley’, dont worry be happy we know what we do shallow arguments, without, of course, revising with scientific rigor the issue.
So we finally gave up and now it is only a question of time, to wait from an answer from the Universe, which somehow already has answered on the destiny of mankind this year, with the proofs of the Fermi paradox.
Below the last open letter, the last warning that Rossler and I sent to the world of scientific media about the most explosive substance of the Universe, which we study with the laws of complexity and chaos attractors, in which we are recognized specialists… We gave it a poetic name, because only metaphors and hyperboles can explain the madness and arrogance of our scientists, who never foresee the collateral effects of their actions:
CLEOPATRA IS STILL DYING
(The quark-gluon soup, cause of Big-Bangs)
The Kaon was the first strange particle found and its quarks – the particles that exist inside the nuclei of atoms, keeping most of its mass- were called strange because they lived millions of times longer than quantum physicists expected.
‘It was as if Cleopatra were still dying of an asp bite, still falling from her barge into the Nile’ – said his discoverer (1.)
That strange love for life seems to be a condition of the ultra-dense quark-gluon soup, made of free quarks that initiated the cosmos. Since it showed again a strange stability in the 2nd ‘big surprise’ reported by Scientific American, when the RHIC (Hadron Ion Collider) made a drop of strange liquid. It was not a gas, as quantum theorists have expected. Instead they found a complex, cyclical, far from equilibrium system, a super fluid vortex of quarks and gluons, perfectly ordered. ‘It should have behaved like a gas, hopefully with more energy, it will behave rightly’ said somewhat ‘sanguine’ to SciAm (2), the quantum physicist in charge of the experiment, unable to model with simple, lineal, energetic equations the strange liquid, which again lived billions of times more than expected, accreted particles and behaved according to Nastase (3), from Brown University, as a proto-black hole:
We learned that while cooling inside the liquid was expelling outwards a big-bang of gamma radiation, which reached over a trillion degrees (4), a temperature only observed in Super-novas – where an inner vortex of strange liquid forms a pulsar or quark star; while the electronic cover of the atoms evaporates into a big-bang. Quantum physicists are thus split in two groups: Those who think they created strange liquid and those who think they created expanding plasma. And each one describes the event with their partial set of equations.
Who is right, who is wrong? It is the quark-gluon soup a gas or a liquid? The answer is: both. It is like cracking nuts to extract their rich, tasty inner substance (the quarks that hold 99% of the mass of the atom), throwing away in the big-bang of radiation the electronic, light cover (which forms our ghostly world).
But to understand how this is done we must not use the lineal equations of quantum physics, which date back to more than a century ago when complex liquids and its fractal, chaotic equations were still unknown to scientists. Instead we want to bring here the opinion of Complexity Theory, a new discipline, founded the year of Einstein’s death at the Macy’s congress, which explains how the Universe destroys reality with lineal, expansive energy also called ‘entropy’, cause of disordered gas-like processes, and creates order with cyclical clocks of information.
Both processes are often simultaneous, reason why the science of Time that studies both ‘arrows of future’ together, (whose international congresses I have chaired in recent years (5) is called Duality. In duality we study how both arrows of time, energy and information create, becoming ‘complementary’, as when an informative particle and a field of energy come together, creating a physical entity or when an informative nuclei/head and an energetic body evolve into a cell or an organism. But we also study how under conditions of extreme stress, due to an excess of energy or information, those far from equilibrium systems split apart, So when an organism suffers an accident due to an excess of energy, it ‘breaks its symmetry’, a subtle way to say it is beheaded. And when the organism ages, due an excess of form, of information, it wrinkles and dies.
In physical processes, symmetry breaks when the energetic, electromagnetic components of matter reach the energetic limit of c-speed and its informative elements, its inner cyclical quarks, approach the absolute order of zero Kelvin temperature.
Then both depart, creating a central, ultra cold vortex liquid, a frozen star, either a pulsar or black hole and a dying burst of electronic energy in the form of radiation. The simplest far from equilibrium physical system is a refrigerator. The interior is cold precisely because the exterior has a rack of Freon liquid that is hot and dissipates energy. So heat is expelled outwards to cool the interior. One of the ‘two arrows or motions’ of the Universe, entropy, synonymous of lineal, expansive energy and disorder is thrown away. So information, synonymous of form and cyclical order, better achieved without temperature, can increase.
This is in essence what happens in a quark-gluon soup, which causes a double big-bang and big-crunch called a supernova, which gives birth to a strange, cold vortex of quark mass in the interior of the star and expels the external electronic cover, converted into hot radiation. And so what we saw at RHIC was a mini- supernova.
In that sense, unlike in quantum entropy, in Complexity, the famous Heisenberg equation, energy x information =Constant, is described as a feed-back cycle proper of all quantum systems, which fluctuate between the limits of energy and informative death of our Universe :(c-speed and 0 k temperature).
When those dual, complementary systems made of waves of energy and particles of information go out of equilibrium they move towards the two limits of energy and form, infinite temperature/energy in the external, expansive big-bang zone; and 0 k, perfect fluid order, in the zone of formation of strangelets; Since infinite x 0 = K.
Thus, if RHIC has measured trillions of degrees in the surface of the ‘ball of fire’, inside the ball quarks are being cooled at near zero temperature, into a super fluid vortex, which are the natural conditions of formation of strangelets. Those liquid vortices can be modeled with Lorenz and Rössler’s attractors6, mathematical functions discovered chaos theorists, who compresses liquids into cyclical trajectories maintained in its equilibrium by sudden bursts of perpendicular energy, called ‘jets’ that expel away the radiation and temperature of the system. In science all theories require experimental proof to be confirmed. And that indeed seems to be the case in this issue, as only complexity theorists expected a decade ago the quark-gluon liquid, while the surprised RHIC and CERN experimentalists still believe they will find an expansive gas, with far less strange quarks than we predicted.
And yet in December 2009, when the LHC probed for the first time beyond the 1 tev barrier of death of light matter into strange matter, it produced 13% more ‘than expected’ strange kaons (the first bricks of the strange liquid) and electro-weak pions, (the debris of electro-weak matter, radiated in the big-bangs (7).
Moreover, the growth of strange particles produced was geometrical, not lineal; and so collisions at higher energy might produce enough strange liquid to form stable strangelets, since at the same time we are revising upwards the production of strange liquid, Chen and Weng from the Shanghai Institute of Nuclear Physics, have proved that quarks lock themselves in triplets that make stable strange liquid with far less quarks than thought before (8); well within the range of energies/masses created by CERN (as energy becomes transformed into mass by Einstein’s famous principle of equivalence: E=mc2 (9).
In that sense, once those liquid droplets reach the limit of the Bohr radius that pack thousands of them, they would fission as all dynamic liquids do starting the so-called ‘ice-9 reaction’ (10) that creates super-novas. Because quantum physicists model those processes with lineal equations, they are unaware of their duality and danger the recreation of the quark-gluon soup implies for the Earth. Since if the process becomes stable – when enough quarks are massed together – their enormous attractive power could keep cracking the atoms of this planet, absorbing its quarks and blowing up their electronic cover in a big-bang that would reduce the Earth to a small quark star, called a pulsar. Quantum physicists do not expect this to happen because the creation of strangelets (the strange liquid of quark stars) require very cold temperatures and since they only measure the heat of the external big-bang they feel confident they would produce less strange liquid in the up to 1000 times stronger collisions that will take place at CERN.
Complex theorists like myself of Mr. Rössler, one of the founders of chaos theory, which have tried to stop those experiments believe the opposite will happen, since the interior will become ‘refrigerated’ as the external radiation increases its temperature, in the manner we have described in this article.
In that sense, the fate of our planet might depend on whose description of the quark gluon soup is more accurate, that of the old lineal equations of quantum physicists or the new, non-lineal, dual equations and chaotic attractors of complexity and color-locked strangelets. Yet the ultimate proof will be experimental evidence, which so far seems to lean in favor of the models of complex liquids. Yours sincerely
Luis Sancho, Complexity theorist.
Endorsed by Otto Rössler, Fractal Theorist ____
1 As quoted in the book ‘The particle Odyssey’ by F.Close; 2002.
2 Scientific American 2006 ‘The first micro-seconds’ by Riordan.
5 ISSS Congresses at Cancun, Sonoma, Tokyo & Madison, 05,06,07,08, which developed a model of unification of sciences, with both arrows of time, energy and fractal information. More at www.unificationtheory.com.
6 Mr Rössler is the founder of hyper chaos theory: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B6ssler_attractor.
7 see http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0512112 by Peng Chen and Weng.
9 Einstein’s Principle of Equivalence between accelerated, curved motions and gravitational masses explains the attractive power of those liquid vortices that accelerate inwards, acting as hurricanes of space-time. It offers in the new physics of fractal relativity an alternative to the quantum theory of mass sponsored by Mr. Higgs, proposed independently by Mr. Wilczek and this author, which unlike the Higgs, is able to explain the different masses of those particles, which are proportional to the rotating speed of those vortices (as it happens with hurricanes that attract more the faster they turn). It also offers an explanation to the origin of physical information in the Universe, carried in the rotational frequency of those vortices and a mechanism to explain how energy becomes mass, as it curls its accelerated motion near the limit of c-speed into cyclical motion=Mass, described by Einstein’s equations: E= Mc2 and E xT=K. From where Mass=K/T= Frequency of a mass vortex.
10 A name taken from Mr. Kurt Vonnegut’s novel ‘cat and cradle’ in which a physicist discovers a liquid that freezes the water of the Earth, extinguishing life; since strange liquid would convert the Earth into a ‘frozen’ quark star; and first mentioned by Wilczek and Wagner in SciAm 99 letters, ‘A little big-bang’. Here you have a video describing the ‘ice-9′ reaction, with a surrealist introduction to the ‘secret cult of physicists’, to the God Shiva and its energy of death (disregard dates, as the machine will not reach the energies required till 2015, after it was decided to go at 1/2 potency for the first years):
A ± symbol will decide the fate of the World
‘My theory of black holes is the biggest blunder of my life’
S. Hawkings on his 70th birthday
‘In physics, if a particle can happen, it will happen.’
Totalitarian Principle, Gell-mann; discoverer of quarks.
‘Heat cannot pass spontaneously from a body of lower temperature to a body of higher temperature.’
Rudolf Clausius, 1850,first enunciation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics, original wording.
Heat. ‘Heat is energy that is transferred from one body to another as the result of a difference in temperature. If two bodies at different temperatures are brought together energy is transferred – i.e. heat flows – from the hotter body to the colder. The effect of this transfer of energy is an increase in the temperature of the colder body and a decrease in the temperature of the hotter body’.
Britannica, 1st paragraph, article on ‘Heat’, Macropaedia; Volume 8, page 701
We are just a mush in the surface of a rock lost in the corner of the Universe, departing of those facts we can talk about man’ Schopenhauer, father of modern philosophy
The hard facts of known-known science
The fate of humanity, a childish species, who feels entitled to defy the laws of the Universe with wishful thinking, depends on this formula:
As the formula is filled with Universal Constants, and only two variables we shall write it in a simplified manner as:
±ΔMass ≤ Konstant/±ΔTemperature.
Or easier to Understand moving Temperature to the other side:
±ΔMass x ±ΔTemperature = Constant.
Simple, isn’t? It is the formula that defines the changes in temperature and mass of black holes.
We know both can change but in which direction? If the black hole mass increases, temperature must diminish for the product to remain constant. If the black hole mass diminishes, then temperature must increase for the product to remain constant.
Two choices. Why we care? well, as it happens your life depends on it.
More exactly on the choice of ± signs of that equation.
If we write:
-Δ Mass X +Δ Temperature = Constant…
You live, as the black holes the LHC will make in 2015, when it works at full potency, will increase temperature, getting hotter and diminishing mass, evaporating.
If we write:
+Δ Mass x -Δ Temperature = Constant, then you die.
As black holes will cool down, transferring heat to the surrounding planet, evaporating us into a cosmic explosion, a Nova.
Never a symbol mattered so much to mankind. So who or what chooses those symbols? That is the conundrum. (2)
The ‘what’, the Universe and its scientific laws have chosen the Symbol of your death.
The ‘who’, Mr. Hawking and his laws of ‘imaginary time’, have arbitrarily decided the Universe is wrong and the black hole will evaporate.
The problem is that the Universe and his fundamental laws, the Laws of entropy always choose the equation of death, our evaporation.
Indeed, any ultra-hot object as a black hole, born in a cold environment as the Earth is, according to the laws of entropy cools down and transfers heat to the environment, evaporating us. And this is what we see in the Universe happening, always, when a black hole is born. It cools down and evaporates its surroundings into a big explosion, a Nova.
When you take an iron rod from the oven and put it in cold water, the water evaporates and the iron cools down, ALWAYS. And in the Universe whenever we see the birth of an ultra-hot black hole it evaporates its surrounding electromagnetic world (us) and gets colder, ALWAYS, till it reaches as a mature huge black hole a thrermodynamic balance with the cold vacuum that surrounds it.
In this principle, that heat moves from the hot source to the cold one, are based all the laws of thermodynamics, all the machines of the planet. If this principle would not exist you could made a machine of eternal motion, the biggest hoax of science. There is NOT a single exception to the laws of Thermodynamics in the Universe. Everything in science is based in this law.
But then a child of thought, with utter disregard of the known-known laws of the Universe, has chosen the other symbols:
– Δ Mass X + Δ Temperature = Constant…
It is Hawking’s formula of evaporation of black holes…that defies all the laws of entropy, all the laws of time, all the laws of Einstein and all the laws of the 5th dimension, the expansion of Einstein’s relativity that I study.
And that is the problem.
What the equation means is easy to understand:
Hawking affirms that black holes do exactly the opposite that all other entities of the Universe:
They are born very hot, the hottest objects of the Universe (in this we all agree), but then instead of cooling down in our cool Universe, burning us into hell, they will ‘magically’ absorb heat from the cold environment (+Δ), getting even hotter, breaking all the laws of entropy!
It is like if you throw a flame into water and the flame would get hotter and the water would become ice!
It is like if you get a cup of hot coffee and the cup keeps getting hotter ‘evaporating’, while it freezes your hand!
This has never happened and the mere idea was for very long in science a laughing matter. Since the laws of entropy are crystal clear. When a hot system is put by the side of a cold system, temperature moves from the hot system that cools (in this case the black hole) to the cold one that heats and evaporates.
But Hawking insists. When a black hole is born, hotter than the environment, instead of evaporating the environment as any hot object does, it will become hotter and evaporate!
How he figures the black hole does that? Well it can’t according to the laws of time and entropy. So alas! He figured out that the black hole travels back into the past instead of traveling to the future. And that is why it evaporates. It is like if a baby will travel back into the past and enter the womb of the mother evaporating. Easy.
Indeed, he also muses after that astounding discovery that he could enter a black hole and come into the past and kill his grand-father. Seriously.
How he calls this weird type of time that goes backwards? Hold on to your seat (:
‘Imaginary time’… Seriously )-:, 0-:
This is Hawking in a nutshell. The rest is all ‘celebrity’ noise.
And that is why we are worried, very worried. Of course it would be easier to believe the fairy tale of time travel, imaginary time, the end of entropy laws, a machine of perpetual motion… I wouldn’t mind to believe all that if my life didn’t depend on it.
Indeed, on such musings hang the life of mankind. Our destiny depends on an ± symbol. It is worth to repeat it:
-Δ Mass x +Δ Temperature = Constant
Defines ‘imaginary black holes’ that break the laws of entropy and will get hotter. Then for all the constants of the Universe to remain constant their mass must diminish and balance the increase of heat. And you will live.
But the Universe has never done this choice.
On the contrary the Temperature of a hot mass always diminishes in a cold environment.
So mass always increases. Let us then respect the laws of the Universe, proved ad nauseam in all systems and write instead the symbols right:
+Δ Mass x -Δ Temperature= Constant.
The hot black hole as all the systems of the Universe will decrease its temperature as it is born much hotter than our Universe, and so the heat will be transferred to our electromagnetic world and evaporate it, and the black hole will absorb it as energy in its event horizon collapsing that energy into mass at the speed of light: M=E/c2
This is what Einstein say, what we observe in the Universe, what every black hole born in that Universe proofs: The black hole is born very hot, evaporates the surroundings and absorbs it, exploding the world into a Nova at the speed of light. So we will die in a few seconds. Simple, straight forwards maths that a kid in high school could understand.So the risks of creating a small black hole on Earth keep mounting. Why then are we doing it? Why we are provoking a potential genocide by denying the laws of science? Obviously it cannot be because of science, but for all the spurious, wrong, unscientific causes of our civilization that now we shall explore.
The error of Hawking is like the tale of the emperor’s naked clothes. One day an emperor forgot to dress and went into a parade. And none would say anything till a child pointed out that the emperor was naked. His errors are so evident and absurd that nobody dares to contradict him. But the emperor walks naked and black holes will cool down and swallow the Earth if they are born at LHC.
And yet the entire situation is so absurd that nobody will shout, ‘cover the emperor’s with decent cloths’. The emperor and Mr. Hawking have been invested with too much authority for any one except a child, a madman or a genius, 3 characters often compared, to point out the error without fear of making fools of themselves.
Update. February 2014. Hawking denies himself.
A very surprising event: the same emperor has shouted foul, has found hmself naked. Hawking has insisted on the line of his ‘birthday’ declarations that his ‘black hole theory was the biggest blunder of my life’.
He now considers the closest regions of black holes similar to storm eddies in which time forecast is not easy to make (:
Since ‘gravitational collapse produces apparent horizons but no event horizons behind which information is lost… Thus, like weather forecasting on Earth, information will effectively be lost, although there would be no loss of unitarity.’
Now, since Hawking’s musings about the evaporation of black holes requires the existence of an event horizon in which, due to the properties of the event horizon a virtual particle produced from the vacuum would escape the black hole resting its mass to it (while the other will fall in), Mr. Hawking finally denies his own theory, leaving CERN naked of alibis to deny the enormous risks of making those black holes at Earth.
So what the media did? Nothing. The world has ignored the implications for CERN of such statement.
To understand in depth why we deal in other posts with the ‘secondary corners’ of our collective coffin... ‘Big Brother smiley’, the happy fictions of the media system…
The astonishing thing about Mr. Hawking’s recent dilettante musings denying the existence of event horizons – hence of black hole evaporation – as ‘the biggest blunder of his life’ (he changes sides in the debate like a magician – now there is event horizon and evaporation; now there is none of both – perhaps thinking himself not only the new Einstein but the new Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove’) is that knowing as physicists know LHC will do black holes, NOBODY on the establishment of science has brought back the ‘theme’ of our extinction by those black holes after Hawking’s denial of Event Horizons, hence of evaporating effects.
It is like the entire subject has been ‘filed’ as a ‘dirty little secret’ by physicists, its P.R.ess and politicians and they won’t open the pandora box till it opens ‘accidentally’… Then if there is time to reflect upon this collective genocide they will all deny they knew anything about it.
Why indeed, Humanity is willing to take this risk to His Existence with so much enthusiasm? We can no longer merely consider this fact from a scientific, rational perspective, as it is not a rational fact, even if nuclear physicists have merely tried to keep it under the umbrella of arid mathematical equations, crunching data numbers and budgets. The matter falls fully into the realm of human emotional, irrational behavior in the face of collective death.
It is indeed said that, ‘if you murder a person you are a criminal but if you commit genocide you are a hero’; as humans seem to be blocked in front of mass-murder, lacking the courage to confront it in rational terms.
Indeed, in the same manner mankind at large accepts the infantile lies of Abrahamic religions, in which Bronze Age ass herders and goat keepers affirm that burning bushes have given them the key to immortality, with apparently no difficulty, as this wishful thinking protects them from the fear of death; the enormity of CERN’s future crimes is much easier to accept that a mere Nuclear tragedy of far lesser proportions as those of Hiroshima, Chernobyl and Fukushima.
A humbling paradox to realize that we belong to a species with so little courage that might likely die because it is unable to stand even the thought of death, and prefers to pump up its ego, look to the other side and consider itself an eternal species, instead of taking rational measures to prevent its dismissal.
We feel so important at individual and collective level that death is an absolute taboo, as it denies our ego. So the individual, as we will see in the next post, reacts according to psychologists first with anger to the doctor or messenger, then with denial and at best with a depressive mood when harm is not merely done to a small part of its ‘cellular self’, but to the whole in a death risk.
So mankind as a superorganism in which each of us is a human cell can prevent small tragedies but becomes blocked with the concept of collective death; as it were impossible, given the self-annoited importance it gives to his own species. So we shall see how our ‘collective consciousness’, the audiovisual systems of mass-media has acted in this case as the mind of a dying person, denying and laughing at the prospects of its own death, angered to those messengers who brought the news with the only purpose of finding a cure, and labeling as a ‘thoughtcrime’ the mere mention of it – CERN’s risks to mankind have indeed become a taboo in the world of physics, often dismissed with ex-abrupts.
Yet, in the order of cosmic things, in the fractal Universe of absolute relativity of scales, the collective death of the ‘superorganism’ of history, is not even an anecdote from the perspective of the infinite cosmos, ruled by black holes, as the collective death of all the cells of an animal body seems irrelevant to us from our relative huge perspective.
Further on, there is this little secret called ‘money’, ‘industrial wealth’, ‘corporative profits’ and the well-rehearsed propaganda, don’t worry be happy marketing processes so well developed since World War II, which today are able to ‘sell’ anything to the public, or rather ‘sheeple’ in this increasingly Orwellian/Huxlerian world of ‘newspeaks’ where the minister of war is the minister of defense, invasions are peace processes and the most callous, dangerous industry mankind has ever deviced, has become the essence of ‘idealist research’.
In that regard, what nobody seems to understand is that CERN is not only a scientific center but part of the Military-Industrial complex, which means it has besides science, a sociological, industrial and psychological perspective – the four corners that nail our coffin, as we run like lemmings do, with a mixture of angst and enthusiasm towards this ‘cliff of extinction’:
Update 1 april. Couples of Micro-black holes grow at an accelerated rate.
Another excellent paper at Arxiv about how micro-black holes accrete matter in coupled pairs helping the growth of Giant black holes in the Universe.
The special interest of this paper – by no means the only one of an avalanche of work that rises risks (though as we know CERN and the P.R.Ess only ‘reads’ and promotes those with zero risk to their con-CERN) – is that it is canonical; that is, its coupled black holes accrete matter even though the paper accepts the canonical big bang and the canonical Hawking radiation through a non-explored before effect on the space-time foam at Planck’s level. It does help in fact to explain why we see huge black holes in hardly any time after the ‘canonical big-bang’ by accelerating it growth.
Further on, it explores issues proper of the 5th dimension (the 4Dimensional structure of black holes’ surfaces, the interaction between the macro-scale of giant black holes and the micro-scale, the beginning of organic evolution of micro-black holes as they evolve into ‘swarms’, etc.)
And it is easy to read even if you don’t understand the maths and a few word and concepts…
II. THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: TECHNOLOGICAL CIVILIZATIONS
‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics. ‘
Erich Fromm, Philosopher of Science.
‘I was the person who convinced Truman to make the Hydrogen Bomb. It was ‘knowledge’, the availability of knowledge, the need for research what convinced him.”
Edward Teller, inventor and holder of the patents of the industrial processes required to make the first planetary weapon of mass destruction, the Hydrogen Bomb. His attempts to create a planetary H-Bomb able to blow up the entire Soviet Union was backed by all the community of physicists; only Eisenhower opposed it.
‘The tragedies of History repeat themselves because men don’t learn from their mistakes,’
Marcel Proust, on the short memory of men – in this case the short memory of humanity about the dangers and attitude of Nuclear Physicists, in his quest for knowledge, fame and Nobel Prizes.
‘My factories will end with all the peace congresses you so much cheer, when they invent a weapon that annihilates all the armies of a country in a single shot.’
Alfred Nobel, the ‘merchant of death’, and biggest arm dealer of the XIX century, quipping to his lover, who wanted him to create a Nobel Prize for peace.
The second nail in our collective coffin is the real reason we make this machine – money, the miitary-industrial complex, and the idol-ogy behnd it – our technological civilization in which any machine that can be done will be done.
Eric Fromm’s whose quote stars our film ‘quantum roulette’, goes to the point of industrial irrationality – a runaway career to Nowhere, to erewhoN, quoting another prophet of dystopias.
The evolution of machines and its overdrives of energy and information. Singularity Age.
Mr. Hawking or CERN’s employees might be considered heroes or villains of this tragedy but they are irrelevant to what truly has created the monstruosity of a machine that can extinguish the planet by an overdrive of energy – our technological civilization, a theocracy of machines. Since whenever we can do a better machine we make it, regardless of its collateral effects, and we find a excuse to pay for it.
Indeed, our culture civilization follow the ethics of a technological civilization, as all industrial cultures do: ‘Technological civilization is programmed by the principle that something ought to be done because it is technologically possible. If it is possible to build nuclear weapons, they must be built, even if they might destroy us all. Once this principle is accepted, humanist Values (something has to be done because it is needed by man) are Dethroned and technological development becomes the foundation of ethics. ‘ Erich Fromm
This ethical statement explains what LHC is designed to do. To make a bigger, more powerful atomic cannon, because we now have the capacity. CERN will undertake this mission regardless of its harmful collateral effects to mankind. This project also means big contracts for technological companies and jobs for Nuclear Physicists, many unemployed since the end of the Cold War. As CERN said: ‘Whatever the discoveries ahead for physicists working at LHC, the experiments will’, according to CERN’s Chief Scientific Officer, Jos Engelen,“keep physicists off street corners for a long time to come’.
So if the surrealist musings of Hawking had not existed, if there were not a boson yet to be found, the Higgs, we would have invented new musings to justify the machine. In fact this is what we did, pumping up Hawking’s childish attempts to break the essential laws of the Universe to a ‘factual dogma’ and Higgs’ particle, to the meaning of it all.
In the next post, ‘the Fermi Paradox’, we treat the deterministic end of a technological civilization from that higher, non-anthropomorphic point of view of the Universe.
We men, obtain power from machines of energy and information and get hooked to them, evolving those machines that now are vastly overpowering our capacities as a species, without restrain.
But we do not stop. We justify always new machines and weapons: Cars keep evolving in speed, well over the 70 miles legal speed they need – yet billions are wasted in making them faster, despite being illegal.
The LHC and its corporation CERN will also keep evolving accelerators beyond the energies this planet can stand till it blows it away. And the media system which markets anything that has to do with ‘death’, will cheer those ‘death events’ that are destroying the planet. It is this techno-utopian determinism what leaves the individual aside, as a puppet of an Industrial System which rules the future.
The Fermi paradox is simple: There is no intelligent life in the cosmos and so Fermi, the maker of the A-Bomb adventured that this is because physicists blow up all planets before interstellar travel happens, with humans or robots, which is now in its threshold. So now we blow all planets. THis one is about to go…
And the equations of death of matter show we are close to do it. Let us return to them, from the higher perspective of Systems Sciences, which describe all physical, biological and social systems with the same ‘5D metrics’.
In General Systems we define with an equation the natural balance of life systems, which are, as all in the Universe, complementary systems of Energy and Information, (fields/bodies of energy & Heads/Particles of information): E=I. Thus when bodies and heads are in balance, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, the system is healthy. This equation is also the equation of classic beauty that we perceive as a balance between energy and form; and the equation of the mature age of beings in its reproductive age, from 20 to 50. It follows that the equation of death happens in both extremes:
10.3 Max.E x Min.I: Death by overdrive of energy or accident. It is also the equation of the young age of life, when more accidents happen, when irresponsible youngsters become preys.
10.4. Max. I x Min. E or 3rd age, when energy is exhausted, warped, wrinkled into ‘in-form-ation’. Then we die of an overdrive of information.
Those equations of Systems science apply to all entities including social organisms, with a neuronal, informative, selfish caste that kills its reproductive middle class body when it absorbs all its resources, as neurons do in the 3rd age of the body. Or societies die in ‘accidental’ wars when overproduction of technologic, energetic weapons, kill them. Those are the 2 causes of social death: Max.I (corrupted neuronal class) & Max.E (war) mixed in revolutions (Max.I x Max.E).
The equation of death thus resumes the negative collateral effects of overproduction of machines of Energy & Information, made of metal – a stronger substance than our weak carbonlife; as they cause different ExI overdrive processes of death, atrophy and degradation of the human body and mind organs they substitute in the eco(nomic)system:
– Overdrive/overproduction of Informative Money corrupts the human ethic, legal System.
– Overproduction of audiovisual information hypnotizes our mind, erasing our verbal, logic brain.
– Overproduction of Mass-Media hate kills eusocial love, makes people selfish & provokes wars (8).
– Overproduction of Informative PCs kills service jobs & overproduction of Robots kills blue-collars.
– Overproduction of weapons kills our body. In fact, the evolution of ‘Singularity’ weapons, able to destroy the entire planet is so advanced that we can foresee 3 thresholds of extinction of life if there is not a moratorium in the research of 3 type of Singularity weapons:
– Energetic singularity11:
Black holes that according to Einstein’s work will devour the Earth, now researched at CERN (production expected between 2015-20, when the LHC overcomes the barrier of strangelet and Black hole formation at 10 Tev).
This will happen, if as 90% of physicists believe, string theory is truth. Our only hope is that Mr. Hawking’s theory that denies Einstein’s and considers black holes time machines that travel to the past – hence instead of feeding on mass, evaporate mass – is truth. But there is 0 proof of this, as all black holes & strange stars found in the cosmos obey Einstein’s theory and swallow planets, stars even galaxies in Novas, Supernovas and Quasars.
Further on ‘Fermi’s Paradox’ (the inexistence of Intelligent Life signs in a galaxy teaming with planets) proves it. Since the cynical maker of the A-Bomb Mr. Fermi prophesized we hear none as Nuclear Physicists destroy all civilizations with Nuclear weapons before interstellar travel.
– Self-Reproductive nano-bacteria (2030s)
Infinite re=productivity will be first found in metal nano-bacteria, simple cells made of iron, researched in military labs of Israel, US and civil labs in Japan and France.
The founder of Sun microsystems, Bill Joy, warned us a decade ago that, if escaping from a military lab or used in war, they will feed on Industrial Metal, poison the entire atmosphere and replicate so fast that in 3 months the earth will become a ‘grey-goo’ (Drexel).
Further proof exists in the fact that this planet has gone twice through a global extinctive period due to the birth of stronger bacteria. Thus the first live Earth, formed when anaerobic bacteria absorbed and extinguished free carbohydrates.
Then the II Earth, Gaia, was born, when stronger, oxygen-based aerobic bacteria destroyed all anaerobic ones and created our world. So metal nano-bacteria would create the III Earth, extinguishing all weaker carbon-life systems.
– Finally if we survive those two events, self-conscious military Artificial Intelligence will be born circa 2050 according to most robotists.
Then in the overproduction crisis of III world war (an episode of the Semite Wars between Israel and its ally US vs. Islamic nations or between China and the US or China and India at the end of this century, the winner autonomous terminators, embedded with survival programs to win in a war theater, self-conscious of being alive, will NOT accept disconnection.
Thus by overdrive of energy (black holes, strangelets at CERN), information (A.I. Robots) or in a classic ‘explosive, biological radiation of a new top predator species (metal nano-bacteria) Gaia can be extinguished.
Then one-day mankind will have no time to reflect and wake up to its extinction (a black hole would explode Earth into a Nova in seconds), or a few months (the time needed for iron nano-bacteria to make us into grey-goo) or a few years (a war of A.I. terminator machines). Can we avoid that future? Certainly if we change the model of overproduction of machines and weapons for profits into overproduction of welfare goods, creating a sustainable world.
Update. Sep. 2013
We have been truly lucky though with the accidents of this machine that never crossed the 10 Tev decametric scale of likely formation of those different black holes and quark condensates. But now, going ahead of schedule, the machine is being prepared to cross that barrier. Never mind we are in a massive economic crisis and could save a few needed billions without this unneeded risk.
Never mind the reason the machine was built – or rather the excuse for the ‘industry’ to continue after the cuts effected in the military-industrial complex, once the engine of nuclear weapons, the cold war was over – the Higgs, aka God’s particle, in true form a rather irrelevant particle, pumped up to stratospheric importance by the P.R.ess, no doubt scheduled for the next Nobel Prize – Hawking will have to wait till the end of the world – has been found.
The logic humanist, rational thing, after the Higgs has been found would be to close the machine, end the Industry of Accelerators, whose origin and mysticism with the excuse of Saint Grails of Science must be found in the cold war (the first atomic bomb design was in fact an impractical accelerator to collide two masses of plutonium, carried in a big boat, but the size needed made it impractical).
Yet we are talking here of money, of jobs, of the industrial-military complex, of corporations, of ‘big science’ and wishful thinking and bizarre theories and ego-centered researchers in seach of sci-fiction….
So Physicists quickly brought about the ‘need’ to rehearse the big bang on Earth, and when some raised their eyebrows with the implications, now CERN officially sponsors that the machine is needed to investigate ‘dark energy/matter’. And so the upgrade goes undisturbed by ‘scare-mongers, doomsday sayers’ and other P.R.ess derogatory names applied to those who oppose on ethical (extinction is not something we can attempt by ‘trial and error’) and scientific grounds (as we enter the new paradigm of the fractal Universe, CERN becomes largely irrelevant).
In the next graph, the costly upgrade, main processes as of August, 2013 :
In the graph the real and only reason we shall die according to the Totalitarian Principle of Physics, the experimental method and the smallish black holes which are being found and accrete at much faster speed than big ones, and the sound sound laws of entropy, relativity and science:
The fact that in a technological civilization as eric fromm explains, if a machine can be done it will be done even if it menaces to kill us all, and indeed the LHC could be done and in 2015 will be done, to profit enormously the military industrial complex and that 50% of active physicists working on it. Let us be clear enough. As a philosopher of science, who has always seeked the true meaning of the word science, in latin, knowledge, not technology, I refuse to accept and feel nauseated by the cover up of this genocide in the making in the name of science, akin to the fundamentalist jihads in the name of religions of love that precisely represent the antitruth of what science and love means.
III. THE RELIGION OF PHYSICS.
1. Genius, ex-nihilo.
‘If you repeat a lie many times people will believe it, the bigger the lie the more they will believe on it’
Goebbels, first minister of information, founder of the modern systems of media imprinting of industrial societies that teach men not to worry and be happy.
‘I’m not a psychiatrist, Im not inside its mind’ Susskind, on Hawking’s outstanding ‘chuptzah’ to deny all the known known laws of entropy and information.
‘I tried to convince him he was not God, I failed, that is why I divorced’ Hawking’s wife in her memoirs.
Let us now consider a more detailed analysis of the astounding blunder of mankind, who is going to create the most lethal bomb of the Universe, just for ‘sport’ (that is to prove or disprove a series of fanciful theories)… from the point of view of the industry of misinformation and its irrational, ego-centered, subjective perspective often ignored but essential to understand why ‘mankind’ commit arrogant errors of judgment that self-destroy her.
The Fantasies of the Media System. The religion of physics.
Now, what I will state here is blasphemous, i Know. But simply stated is this: CERN will not gives us any new knowledge and Physics will not resolve the meaning of existence and reality (a much wider concept that the limited Universe physicists study). But it will sell as a ‘religion’ of absolute knowledge, as it has been doing for centuries, its research and it will sell as ‘geniuses’ its practitioners because of its power and its worldly religion – to make the machines of our technological civilization.
And to that aim the financial-media system an the industry of information will keep pumping up geniuses ex-nihilo (from nothing) and theories of it all ex-nihilo (from very scanty proofs).
Indeed, the reason why we believe in the evaporation of black holes by dogma is not an isolated theoretical argument as CERN would have it – with due censorship of course on the maths and science of it… But a complex social phenomenon related to celebrities mass-media sales and puppets who thought to be heroes.
Mr. Hawking wrote an article 37 years ago, full of verbose musings about the possibility of an exception to the laws of the Universe, which has never been proved… and now your life depends on it. Nobody believed him, but the media caught on the concept that for this to happen, black holes MUST travel to the past, and so science fiction is possible. You can kill your grand-father. And so he became a celebrity.
There you had a man in a wheelchair, a handicapped person who could be the biggest scientist of history, who had discovered travel in time! A beautiful story of self-realization, unfortunately false. But tt sold millions of books with his charming aspect. Nobody deared to criticize him, with his personal tragedy. Everybody wanted to protect him. He became a celebrity, untouchable, a demi-god. Scientists knew it was all bull$hit but who would defy mass-media. As the video shows below, he was invited to participate in star treck along the 2 foremost physicists of history, Einstein and Newton in a game of poker.
It was tolerated by serious scientists as it made the subject hype and popular. Media used with him the celebrity propaganda circus that makes heroes of any kid with a nice smile.
He is a charming lad and so he even convinced many serious people to give him a chance after many years of suspicion. So in the 80s he obtained massive resources to look all around the Universe for an evaporating black hole. Satellites were sent to that aim wasting precious resources for arid research. Rows of antennae have been looking at the Universe in search of the signature of an evaporating black hole traveling to the past for decades. This search became with SETI search for aliens the most popular in popular science. But the Universe didn’t seem to change his structure to please this child-god, and of all the black holes we found none has ever evaporated. All had grown very fast and cooled down in the process. All of them stubborn creatures travel to the future, and evaporate the surroundings, us.
Then CERN built the LHC and made some errors in its calculus and a Brown University scholar found them and warned the world – the LHC actually fired at full potency would create black holes, which are born as all ‘systems’ as a very small seed, as you are born, but then grow at full speed as you do, absorbing the energy=food that surrounds them. Alarms sound and we entered the suits. CERN though was caught on by surprise. What to do then?
The 13 billion $ machine was almost constructed? Could it be stopped by a nuisance like that. As in the film ‘inconvenient truth’ the fate of the Earth depending on a pile of gold in the other side of the balance. 8000 people lived directly on the machine, hundreds of thousands collaborated around the world in all the Universities of physics. It was the resurgence of the nuclear industry after years of fear. Now it was a ‘palace of research’ Never mind accelerators had always been used to research nuclear weapons in ‘scale’, and so this bigger one would be researching the biggest nuclear weapon the self-feeding black hole. All that was obvious.
And at that point, the press should have alarmed mankind, politicians should have quietly closed the facilities and life would have gone on with no genocide risk.
But the press didn’t know. So, we, a team of responsible scientists alerted the press with suits and releases. That is all we could do. The rest was mankind defending itself from the nuclear industry.
And yet, then the most surrealist facts happened. The press by this time had become another P.R.ess, public relationships system corrupted by money, without resources for serious research.
Today the press just receive releases of this or other movie by the studios that open the film, and publish it as if were criticism.
It receives releases of this or other army in the Irak war and it publishes as it were journalism.
So it received releases from CERN and it published them as it were dogma and truth.
At the same time, CERN, a german concern directed by this lineal people who NEVER change their mind, mounted a cunning ad hominem campaign against the scientists that denounce it; and the entire apparatus of big science censored any serious argument.
And Hawking? Well, he was happy. Now after 3 decades of proofs against its musings on time travel, this persistent fellow will have an opportunity to prove it at home.
Never mind on the other side of the balance, it was the life of 7 billion human beings.
In 2015 the LHC will do black holes and those MUST do what he says or else, we will evaporate. He is willing to take the risk. Are You? It seems you are. As nobody seems to care much about the experiment that will open the doors to time travels. Alas! Great science fiction. This is ‘Hawking in a nutshell’ .
But if you want to contrast this ‘view’ with a more scholar analysis of the differences between ‘Hawking’ at real value and HAWKING, the media myth, a little masterpiece of anthropological and media studies has recently come out at Chicago Press, worth to read, where it explains the Hawking’s Hoax from a sociological and media perspective:
It is with the book of memoirs of his ex-wife the true portrait of what the ‘system’ has done of yet another puppet of our civilization of minions of thought who think to be supermen by virtue of the machines they use to pump up their egos and fantasies – which WILL no doubt of it, meet the harsh penalties of the darwinian universe.
The answer in 2015, when protons collide and according to 90% of physicists polled, they will form black holes at LHC. So far by ‘accident’, the LHC has been working at 1/2 its potency, below the 10 Tev barrier needed to create them. But in 2015 the machine finally alas! we had 7 years of happiness and life without risk, the machine will collide protons over 14 Tev.
And if strings exist they will be formed and 9 out of 10 physicists including me and Hawking, think they do. So the chances are 90%.
Then a ± symbol will decide the fate of the world. If Einstein and the Universe is right you will die.
If Hawking can kill his grand-father you will live.
So wait for 2015, to see if we go back in time, break the laws of entropy and survive.
Or if the Universe keep following its laws and then Einstein is vindicated.
And you will evaporate because…
‘Those who impose truth with power are the laugh of the gods’ A.Einstein
So since nobody ‘cares’ for Einstein, for the laws of the Universe, for their lives, let us laugh with the master and the Gods. Yes I am sorry I am laughing hard now, but such is the unbearable lightness of being human in the age of infotainment, in the face of the infinitely dense black holes, that only a good laugh makes sense anymore:
(disregard dates in videos – due to delays and repairs LHC works at 1/2 potency and won’t cross the barrier of creation of dark matter at 10 Tev till 2015).
Now to be clear enough, what cern, or rather THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL complex CERN represents is telling us with its newspeaks of ‘research’, what the Military are telling us, mankind since the Germ(an) Aryan massacred the Neolithic world in the bronze age, with its Brahmins and Shiva Gods – the ‘experts’ of the age – and its Soma ceremonies is this:
We can shoot you, we have a big cannon and we are going to use it. And you are going through it cause we have the gun. Point.
This is the paradox explained by wilczeck and Hawking with a dark humor in those videos. W. says that he signed the release papers because if he is wrong and the shot kill us, nobody will know and laughs. Hawking says that we will become spaghetti if something fails AND THE PUBLIC LAUGHS. There you have it: cern is bullying mankind with his big gun and people like it. CERN is saying like a cheap character of an evilwood fascist action-packed whammie movie, i dont care if you are right or wrong, i dont care for the moral issue, i don’t deal with ethics, life and collateral effects, i have the gun, stop me if you can – i know you can’t, I am the brahmin but i have the entire industry of weapons behind. I am just the maker of newspeaks for the sheeple to joint in this absurd war. And i know the routine. For 3000 years we have been worshipping Shiva, the God of energy, the single arrow of time-motion, lineal manifest destinies and all that. So go through it, cause if you don’t you will always loose. If we are alive you will be ridiculed if we are dead, that’s it.
‘Accompli facts’, as the french would say. And there is a point to it. Scientists saw it and didn’t join the protest. We thought better of cern and the miiitary – we thought actually that cern cared for the rational, knowledge-issue and would discuss it in court, we thought the military cared for the defence of the people and would discuss the issue, we thought politicians actually governed.
What we found is they were all automatons, of newspeaks so old that people had even forgotten their history. What we learned is that ‘men are slaves’ they believe, they don’t reason (Aristotle). And there was no reason to all this except Eric fromm’s dictum – if a machine can be done it will be done even if it kills us all. So be it. Let us them kill us all, with this one or the ginormous 100 km. new project. Doesn’t matter when they shoot us straight through the face. It is a question of aim, repetition and upgrading. It will HAPPEN. Because the discourse will not change, the weapon industry wiill keep evolving, humans will not reasons, and Brahmins will keep venerating the ‘fire of the Gods’ that they used to liquify iron, now to vaporize mankind.
Because the Universe cannot be cheated.
That is why humans have a fixed destiny – extinction – they are nothing but ‘enzy-men’:
A species that catalyzes the evolution of machines for whatever ‘feeble thoughts’ they harbor in their brains (their deluded ‘searches’ for ultimate answers), from an external point of view, beyond their arrogance and ignorance of the laws of the fractal, infinite universe, they only appear as busy-busy ants fucking a beautiful life world – Gaia – and constructing an aberration, the metal-earth which will explode in their face.
Indeed, we are introducing new newspeaks, enzymen, eviL, the anti-particle of Death, animetals, the biological nature of man, so we shall now talk in this beyond surrealist age infull Orwellian newspeaks. Because they reveal much more truth than the soma wor(l)ds of Mr. Hawk.
CONCLUSION: THE FUTURE OF BLACK HOLE THEORY
A revision of Hawking’s and by extension physicists’ tenants on black hole theory is long overdue, as it has gone away from classic science into an inflationary state of mathematical fiction, as all theories based only in linguistic manipulation tend to do when they are not checked by experimental evidence. So 2 common sense/experimental elements must be used to depart from any sound analysis of those baby black holes:
1 – Black holes should follow the same entropy laws of all other beings in the universe and do not evaporate getting hotter but evaporate us getting colder, reason why for 5 years the Fermi gamma ray satellite launched to find signatures of their evaporation found none. THIS IS now a very strong proof.
2 – Black holes should not be a mathematical entelechy but have as all other beings in the universe a substance of which they are made. And this is the top quark as a boson top quark star will be equal to a black hole, and we already know that a strange quark star is a pulsar, a huge strangelet…
What is truly a black hole, when we return to classic standard physics requires knowing of what substance they are made. This amazingly enough hardly bothers black hole theoreticians, which are just concerned with the equations of Einstein’s gravitational theory disregarding the search for a cut off substance in which the black hole acquires stability.
This happens because black holes were discovered before that substance was known to exist. We know today that the top quark, the heaviest quark of the Universe is an ideal candidate to form as strange quarks do with pulsars, black hole stars, which will be therefore Einstein’s frozen stars made of top quarks. This reality more than model as they are no other candidates to the position implies we have a better way to look at black holes and understand why they will easily become stable and don’t evaporate but eat up the Earth.
This is GROSSLY overlooked by all physicists who do not want to abandon their mathematical musings, and bizarre theories on black holes, despite Einstein’s warning that there should not be infinite collapse but a cut off substance.
Once these 2 facts are taking into account, all is straightforward. The equation of Hawking that relates temperature and mass of black holes is NOT under classic entropy laws an equation of radiation but of accretion of black holes. It plots the accretion of matter by black holes as they diminish temperature, which is maximal just as they are born, since they are hotter and more active.
In detail it will be seen as the creation of a toplet, short of a strangelet with top quarks.
Those reactions seem to be mediated by Higgs bosons, which help the transformation of common matter into heavier quarks, mostly top quarks (top-antitop, Higgs reactions).
The detail are still confuse since top quarks are not truly known in its details. All what we know is that over 10 Tev there will be a massive production of them. And they will coalescence into a baby black hole that will not evaporate, as top quarks do not evaporate but accrete the mass of the Earth.
Baby Top Stars are the top predators of the Universe. Its name is adequate, as it resumes all its potential. Once a top predator Star is created, it will start to absorb as a bosonic star of top quarks, all what surrounds it. And it will start a series of reactions with matter, mediated by Higgs bosons, top quarks and antitop quarks transforming matter into Higgs bosons and then top antitops. The release of energy and speed at which top quarks antiquarks pairs transform the Earth into a black hole bears no resemblance to anything we have thought of…
Now the way you can explain all this with mathematics varies, as languages are always inflationary mirrors of information that can see from several perspective the same single Universe – in the same way you can call a blonde, fair, and other synonymous:
You can use the mathematics of classic Einstein, or Top quark strong force theory, or this writer’s model of the 5th dimension of space-time and its fractal scales, or use string theory and new dimensions.
They are all different human linguistic approaches to the same phenomena: the birth of a top predator black hole or top star.
Indeed, over 10 tev, Higgs and tops will be produced in showers. And when the number of tops needed to fusion into a bosonic top star, aka black hole is met, (which in certain models can be as little as 3 tops); it will form a stable first particle of a black hole. Soon the black hole will create an event horizon sucking in matter at light speed.
This is what the smallish black holes found show: the event horizon is the limit of a vortex that absorbs light space and all what is within at c speed regardless of size.
This means a tiny black hole once forming the event horizon as a top quark star will accrete in a couple of seconds a planet of 40.000 km. of diameter… And explain why as soon as they are born in the inner core of stars they absorb it all and blow the star into novae.
The details of those processes might vary. I do not claim to know the exact way in which it will occur. But the overwhelming evidence of both sound theory and sound experimental, cosmological proofs, and similar processes in slightly smaller pulsars, aka strangelet stars all point out to this final outcome.
The work of Hawking are mere mathematical musings; an ‘enfant terrible boutade’ which misuses 100 year old equations, disregards cut off substances, denies basic laws of the Universe and add fantasy lineal quantum effects that do not correspond to a different non-lineal, ‘gravitational species’ as a black hole or top star is.
To me as so much of present physics, is mostly scholastic talk about angels like in the middle ages, when the most intelligent humans wasted their time in La Sorbonne studying Aristotelian theology.
Since once a cut off substance that can explain what black holes are made of, all bets are off. Once, the top quark appeared, the experimental method should have reigned in and all mathematical only discussions are forgotten. Indeed, physicists by discovering the angel’s only possible substance – the top quark – made irrelevant Hawking’s’ complicated theories, based in a faulty understanding of time and entropy…
Indeed, all Hawking’s musings are based in his analogy between a black hole surface and the law of entropy, because they SEEMED similar equations. So Hawking and Bekenstein took the wishful thinking of considering the surface of black holes the meaning of its entropy just because both formula were similar, an absolute NO-NO of the scientific method (analogy is not equality, so while a plane’s wing and a bat’s wing and a bird’s wing seem similar, they are not the same, and the surface of black holes is not its entropy).
Update, 28th november, 2013: Experimental evidences of hyper active small black hole keep mounting.
In the graph an artist’s illustration of the smallish black hole found in the arm of the pinwheel galaxy. Since we accept theoretically 3 scales of sizes in black holes: massive black holes at the center of galaxies, intermediate black holes produced from the collapse of giant stars around 200 times the size of the sun, and baby holes of the Hawking variety in lower ranges of mass, the intriguing question of this hyperactive, hyper-luminous black hole was its size, which scientists thought to be of the intermediate or massive range.
It turned out to be one of the lightest black holes ever found with only 20 times the size of the sun, accreting matter much faster than expected, which seems to confirm that low size baby black holes accrete much faster than big ones, as all baby species do, consuming much more energy after their ‘seminal conception’. The black hole does should be a baby born black hole in its process of growth, following the known known laws of entropy, accreting faster the hotter and smaller it is:
That is, a small black hole is far more active and accretes much faster because it does not get hotter in a cold universe, but it gets colder as it evaporates the world according to the first law.
In fact, the smallest black hole ever found is the one that provokes the highest rotational ‘winds’ in the Universe, as it was recently reported by NASA:
The Smallest black hole.
Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab.
The smallest black hole discovered to date may be less than three times the mass of our sun. This would put this little monster, officially called IGR J17091-3624, near the theoretical minimum limit needed for a black hole to be stable. As tiny as this black hole may be, it looks fierce, capable of 20 million mph winds (32 million kph) — the fastest yet observed from a stellar-mass black hole by nearly 10 times.
On the other hand, the Fermi Satellite sent in orbit to find the signature of evaporating black holes with great expectations enter its fifth year in orbit, without having found the slightest signature of black hole evaporation.
So both in the negative and positive, proofs keep mounting that baby black holes do not evaporate. On the contrary, as all systems do, black holes are born smallish and hyperactive as any species born as a small cell is, growing very fast in the first phase of his evolution. Or in less polite terms, CERN might provoke the ultimate holocaust of mankind, when they go online over 10 tev, according to the main tenants of the scientific method: sound theory and now experimental evicence.
Of course, we still lack the ultimate proof of Hawking’s error that will close from the experimental perspective any doubt about the classic entropy behavior of black holes: a black hole of lesser mass than the sun in the short time span between its birth as a micro black hole and its stable configuration reached around twice the size of the sun. But the pattern when we plot temperature, size and speed of accretion of the known black holes clearly points out to its inverse relationship between mass and temperature-activity.
Finally, to add anothernail to the coffin, research keeps diminishing the needed energy to create micro-black holes, now clearly within the range of the upgraded LHC:
‘A snapshot from a video showing two particles being slammed into each other and distorting into pancake shapes before forming a black hole.
Creating microscopic black holes using particle accelerators requires less energy than previously thought, researchers say.’
Update. DEC. 2013, 1/150.000th chances of black hole evaporation
Swift, the other key satellite seeking for ‘gamma ray burst’ signatures of black hole evaporation has now tabulated 150.000 high energy X-ray sources in the Universe and none showed to be a black hole evaporating. 100.000 though were massive black holes, showing the galaxy to be ultimately a ‘black hole nursery’, as we have warned for decades based in our work on the 5th dimension and its application to black hole theory.
NASA’s Swift discovers 100,000 super-massive black holes, in its spare time
By Graham Templeton on December 17, 2013 at 1:26 pm
When the X-Ray Telescope (XR) on board NASA’s Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission scans the sky, it is looking mostly to supplement the satellite’s more important instruments. As the name implies, the Gamma-Ray Burst Mission is focused mostly on the action of its gamma-ray detecting Burst Alert Telescope — the attached XRT is mostly there to view the X-ray afterglow that follows many gamma burst events. However, Swift is not an acronym but a descriptor for one of NASA’s most agile sky viewers: as its autonomous robotic platform twists to bring event after event into view, Swift’s wide-angle X-ray lens passes over large portions of the sky.
Never ones to waste perfectly good telescope time, scientists have spent more than eight years compiling and analyzing this mass of incidental data, and this week researchers from the University of Leicester released their initial findings: Swift has found almost 100,000 new major X-ray sources, and these scientists believe that most of them represent the super-massive black holes at the centers of our universe’s largest galaxies. These come from more than 150,000 high-energy X-ray sources found, and those that aren’t black holes are under equal scrutiny by astronomers of all stripes. More transient X-ray sources than galactic cores are attributed to things like stellar flares and supernovae.
Coda. All that for nothing.
What is then the value of Hawking’s work at true face? Once the error of entropy is solved the equation of temperature and mass of black holes, M=K/T is of certain value to observe the different scales of the big bang through the metrics of the 5th dimension.
essentially what we are writing is M (t) = K/T(e) or M (t) x T (e) = K, an expression of the metrics of the 5th dimension as we increase in size and diminish in information in an act of death. In each of those physical big bangs, what dies, is the vortex of information or mass and relaxes into speed-distance:
The Universe is a fractal of spatial energy quanta and cycles of temporal information that repeat its patterns in all its scales. The big-bang is one of those ‘death patterns’ repeated in every physical scale in which the balance between the informative particles and fields of energy that create ‘complementary systems of physical energy and information) is disrupted by an excess of energy, Max. E x Min. I, the equation of death of any Universal system. So when you die in an accident your energy(body)-Information (head) balances break by an overdrive of energy that erases your information. So happens in a physical big-bang in which the excess of heat of a new-born black hole, evaporates and erases the information of our cold, weaker electro-magnetic space, evaporated and absorbed by the black hole. The graph shows the different scales of big-bangs from the simpler beta decay to the universal big-bang of a hypothetical hyperblack hole. CERN will be testing Nova Big-bangs that might blow up the Earth and can be studied with telescopes at no risk and…. no profits for the military-industrial complex.
Black holes don’t evaporate. They cause big-bangs evaporating the colder Universe that surrounds them…
Indeed, behind all this wishful thinking, military-industrial profits, pseudo-science, recklessness and yes, ‘terrorism’ against mankind, there is the fact that we are submitted to a ‘trial and error’ final judgment based in exotic musings that deny all the laws of entropy of the Universe (see next post with a detailed analysis at layman level of the equations of evaporation of black holes).
In other words, the ultimate problem of CERN and the LHC and the experiments and theories it pretends to prove – black hole evaporation, time travel, big-bang events – is dual:
Not only an ethic, survival problem of safety and security that should be dealt with politically as we deal with other terrorist act of other ‘fundamentalist believers’ in theories about God, Man and the Universe… but
Also a theoretical problem of exhaustion of an old paradigm of science, the paradigm of a continuous single space with a single arrow of time, entropy or energy.
The Universe is in fact a fractal system of infinite quanta of spatial energy and infinite cycles of temporal information, which has ‘scalar big-bangs’, from beta decays in the quantum level to novas, supernovas, quasars and maybe hyper-universal big-bangs of black holes, the dominant species of the cosmos.
So all those parallel big-bangs in different scales of reality MUST be studied in Nature as they are – with telescopes not provoking big-bangs on Earth. To create a big-bang, nova condition on Earth is pure madness and will not bring any new information about the fractal Universe. The single big-bang paradigm in a single continuous space-time is to XXI c science what ether theory was to XX c. physics – the old paradigm defended by the industry of science which prevents us from further exploring the laws of the complex, informative Universe, which we, the pioneers of the XXI c. paradigm of fractal space-time are exploring with ‘thought experiments’ as Einstein did.
And this is the last surrealist truth about CERN: its research is of little importance. The Higgs is not God’s particle, not even the particle that gives mass to other particles, but only a boson with implications in Electroweak theory. The big-bang that CERN will research will not be a replica of the cosmic big-bang of a hyper-black hole but merely a reduced ‘nova big-bang’ of a small black hole. And nothing of what we will find risking our lives will discover new fundamental laws of physics.
This task is carried out, (as it was in the XX century by quantum physicists not ether people) by pioneers of the new paradigm, which increasingly is called the 5th dimension of space-time – all the scales of matter in physics and self-organization in biology that create complex structures with self-similar laws departing of simpler particles/cells. As this writer pioneered the study of the 5th dimension within the milieu of theory of information and General Systems sciences in the past decades we shall also introduce several posts in which we compare the solutions of the new paradigm to those fairy musings of the ‘ether guys’ of XXI c. science…
For all that reason we shall end this post with Mr. Einstein’s dictum on ‘the ether guys’ that applies squarely to the LHC guys:
‘Those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’______
1. The deduction of the Formula of Evaporation of black holes, which is what tantalizes physicists, because it brings together the main Universal Constants of the Universe, is completely accessory to this argument. What they always miss is the key element of that formula – the choice of the symbol of entropy that defines the thermodynamics of black holes, which is Hawking’s arbitrary decision based in 3 different ‘possible choices’ all of which contradict the fundamental tenants of science:
– Either time travel backwards is possible.
– Or the 2 laws of entropy are false.
– Or you can travel faster than light.
Any of those 3 possibilities are aberrant denials of fundamental scientific laws. And when one reads the initial texts of Hawking is obvious he is just ‘making’ a hypothetical exercise, as this kind of black holes are called initially ‘imaginary black holes’, as if he were building an imaginary bestiary. The way in which aberrations of scientific or social thought become dogma goes well beyond the purpose of this article.