From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Inbred" redirects here. For the 2011 British film, see Inbred (film).

Inbreeding is the production of offspring from the mating or breeding of individuals or organisms which are closely related genetically, in contrast to outcrossing, which refers to mating unrelated individuals.[1] By analogy, the term is used in human reproduction, but more commonly refers to the genetic disorders and other consequences that may arise from incestuous sexual relationships and consanguinity.

Inbreeding results in homozygosity, which can increase the chances of offspring being affected by recessive or deleterious traits.[2] This generally leads to a decreased biological fitness of a population,[3][4] (called inbreeding depression) which is its ability to survive and reproduce. An individual who inherits such deleterious traits is referred to as inbred. The avoidance of such deleterious recessive alleles caused by inbreeding is the main selective reason for outcrossing.[5][6]

Inbreeding is a technique used in selective breeding. In livestock breeding, breeders may use inbreeding when, for example, trying to establish a new and desirable trait in the stock, but will need to watch for undesirable characteristics in offspring, which can then be eliminated through further selective breeding or culling. Inbreeding is used to reveal deleterious recessive alleles, which can then be eliminated through assortative breeding or through culling. In plant breeding, inbred lines are used as stocks for the creation ofhybrid lines to make use of the effects of heterosis. Inbreeding in plants also occurs naturally in the form of self-pollination.


Offspring of biologically related persons are subject to the possible impact of inbreeding, such as congenital birth defects. The chances of such disorders is increased the closer the relationship of the biological parents. (See coefficient of inbreeding.) This is because such pairings increase the proportion of homozygous zygotes in the offspring, in particular deleterious recessive alleles, that produce such disorders.[7] (See inbreeding depression.) Because most recessive alleles are rare in populations, it is unlikely that two unrelated marriage partners will both be carriers of the alleles. However, because close relatives share a large fraction of their alleles, the probability that any such deleterious allele is inherited from the common ancestor through both parents is increased dramatically. Contrary to common belief, inbreeding does not in itself alter allele frequencies, but rather increases the relative proportion of homozygotes to heterozygotes. However, because the increased proportion of deleterious homozygotes exposes the allele tonatural selection, in the long run its frequency decreases more rapidly in inbred population. In the short term, incestuous reproduction is expected to produce increases in spontaneous abortions of zygotes, perinatal deaths, and postnatal offspring with birth defects.[8]

There may also be other deleterious effects besides those caused by recessive diseases. Thus, similar immune systems may be more vulnerable to infectious diseases (see Major histocompatibility complex and sexual selection).[9]

Genetic disorders

Autosomal recessive disorders occur in individuals who have two copies of the gene for a particular recessive genetic mutation.[10] Except in certain rare circumstances, such as new mutations or uniparental disomy, both parents of an individual with such a disorder will be carriers of the gene. These carriers do not display any signs of the mutation and may be unaware that they carry the mutated gene. Since relatives share a higher proportion of their genes than do unrelated people, it is more likely that related parents will both be carriers of the same recessive gene, and therefore their children are at a higher risk of a genetic disorder. The extent to which the risk increases depends on the degree of genetic relationship between the parents: The risk is greatest when the parents are close relatives and lower for relationships between more distant relatives, such as second cousins, though still greater than for the general population.[11]

Children of parent-child or sibling-sibling unions are at increased risk compared to cousin-cousin unions.[12]

Inbreeding may result in a far higher phenotypic expression of deleterious recessive genes within a population than would normally be expected.[13] As a result, first-generation inbred individuals are more likely to show physical and health defects[citation needed], including:

Inbreeding can occur just because a small population has been isolated during some time, so that all breeding individuals became genetically related. It can also occur in a large population if individuals tend to mate with their relatives, instead of mating at random.

Many individuals in the first generation of inbreeding will never live to reproduce.[14] Over time, with isolation such as a population bottleneck caused by purposeful (assortative) breeding or natural environmental factors, the deleterious inherited traits are culled.[5][6][15]

Island species are often very inbred, as their isolation from the larger group on a mainland allows natural selection to work upon their population. This type of isolation may result in the formation of race or even speciation, as the inbreeding first removes many deleterious genes, and allows expression of genes that allow a population to adapt to an ecosystem. As the adaptation becomes more pronounced the new species or race radiates from its entrance into the new space, or dies out if it cannot adapt and, most importantly, reproduce.[16]

The reduced genetic diversity that results from inbreeding may mean a species may not be able to adapt to changes in environmental conditions. Each individual will have similar immune systems, as immune systems are genetically based. Where a species becomesendangered, the population may fall below a minimum whereby the forced interbreeding between the remaining animals will result in extinction.

Natural breedings include inbreeding by necessity, and most animals only migrate when necessary. In many cases, the closest available mate is a mother, sister, grandmother, father, brother, or grandfather. In all cases, the environment presents stresses to remove those individuals who cannot survive because of illness from the population.

There was an assumption that wild populations do not inbreed; this is not what is observed in some cases in the wild. However, in species such as horses, animals in wild or feral conditions often drive off the young of both genders, thought to be a mechanism by which the species instinctively avoids some of the genetic consequences of inbreeding.[17] In general, many mammal species including humanity’s closest primate relatives avoid close inbreeding possibly due to the deleterious effects.[18]


Although there are several examples of inbred populations of wild animals, the negative consequences of this inbreeding are poorly documented.

The cheetah has very low levels of genetic variation, suggesting a population bottleneck (of unknown cause) and subsequent inbreeding sometime in the past several thousand years.[19] All cheetahs now come from this small gene pool. Theoretically, their lack of genetic variance could put cheetahs at greater risk from infectious diseases. One outbreak of feline infectious peritonitis in a captive cheetah population which was studied over a 5-year period had a morbidity rate of over 90%, and a mortality rate of 60%.[20]Conversely, inbreeding can purge a population of deleterious alleles, and the cheetah is known for few genetic illnesses.

In the South American sea lion, there was concern that recent population crashes would reduce genetic diversity. Historical analysis indicated that a population expansion from just two matrilineal lines were responsible for most individuals within the population. Even so, the diversity within the lines allowed great variation in the gene pool that may help to protect the South American sea lion from extinction.[21]

In lions, prides are often followed by related males in bachelor groups. When the dominant male is killed or driven off by one of these bachelors, a father may be replaced with his son. There is no mechanism for preventing inbreeding or to ensure outcrossing. In the prides, most lionesses are related to one another. If there is more than one dominant male, the group of alpha males are usually related. Two lines are then being "line bred". Also, in some populations such as the Crater lions, it is known that a population bottleneck has occurred. Researchers found far greater genetic heterozygosity than expected.[22] In fact, predators are known for low genetic variance, along with most of the top portion of the tropic levels of an ecosystem.[23] Additionally, the alpha males of two neighboring prides can potentially be from the same litter; one brother may come to acquire leadership over another’s pride, and subsequently mate with his ‘nieces’ or cousins. However, killing another male’s cubs, upon the takeover, allows the new selected gene complement of the incoming alpha male to prevail over the previous male. There are genetic assays being scheduled for lions to determine their genetic diversity. The preliminary studies show results inconsistent with the outcrossing paradigm based on individual environments of the studied groups.[22]

In Central California, the Sea Otters were thought to have been driven to extinction due to over hunting, until a colony of about 30 breeding pairs was discovered in the Big Sur region in the 1930s. Since then the population has grown and spread along the central Californian coast to around 2000 individuals, a level that has remained stable for over a decade. Population growth is limited by the fact that all Californian Sea Otters are descended from the isolated colony resulting in inbreeding.

Measures of inbreeding

A measure of inbreeding of an individual A is the probability F(A) that both alleles in one locus are derived from the same gene in an ancestor. Two alleles derived from the same gene in an ancestor are said to be identical by descent. This probability F(A) is called the "coefficient of inbreeding".[24]

Another useful measure that describes the extent to which two individuals are relatives (say individuals A and B) is their coancestry coefficient  f(A,B), which gives the probability that, taking one random allele from A and another random allele from B, both are identical by descent. This is also denoted kinship coefficient between A and B.

A particular case is the self-coancestry of individual A with itself, f(A,A), which is the probability that taking one random allele from A and then, independently and with replacement, another random allele also from A, both are identical by descent. Since they can be identical by descent by sampling the same allele or by sampling both alleles that happen to be identical by descent, we have  f(A,A) = 1/2 + F(A)/2.[25]

Both the inbreeding and the coancestry coefficients can be defined for specific individuals or as average population values. They can be computed from genealogies or estimated from the population size and its breeding properties,but all methods assume no selection or are limited to neutral alleles.

There are several methods to compute this percentage. The two main ways are the path method[26] and the tabular method.[27][unreliable source?]

Typical coancestries between relatives are as follows:

  • Father/daughter, mother/son or brother/sister → 25% (14)
  • Grandfather/granddaughter or grandmother/grandson → 12.5% (18)
  • Half-brother/half-sister, Double cousins → 12.5% (18)
  • Uncle/niece or aunt/nephew → 12.5% (18)
  • Great-grandfather/great-granddaughter or great-grandmother/great-grandson → 6.25% (116)
  • Half-uncle/niece or half-aunt/nephew → 6.25% (116)
  • First cousins → 6.25% (116)

Domestic animals

An intensive form of inbreeding where an individual S is mated to his daughter D1, granddaughter D2 and so on, in order to maximise the percentage of S’s genes in the offspring. 87.5% of D3′s genes would come from S, while D4 would receive 93.75% of their genes from S.[28]

Breeding in domestic animals is assortative breeding primarily (see selective breeding). Without the sorting of individuals by trait, a breed could not be established, nor could poor genetic material be removed. Homozygosity is the case where similar or identical alleles combine to express a trait that is not otherwise expressed (recessiveness). Inbreeding, through homozygosity, exposes recessive alleles.

Breeders must cull unfit breeding suppressed individuals or individuals who demonstrate either homozygosity or heterozygosity for genetic based diseases.[29] The issue of casual breeders who inbreed irresponsibly is discussed in the following quotation on cattle:

Meanwhile, milk production per cow per lactation increased from 17,444 lbs to 25,013 lbs from 1978 to 1998 for the Holstein breed. Mean breeding values for milk of Holstein cows increased by 4,829 lbs during this period.[30] High producing cows are increasingly difficult to breed and are subject to higher health costs than cows of lower genetic merit for production (Cassell, 2001).

Intensive selection for higher yield has increased relationships among animals within breed and increased the rate of casual inbreeding.

Many of the traits that affect profitability in crosses of modern dairy breeds have not been studied in designed experiments. Indeed, all crossbreeding research involving North American breeds and strains is very dated (McAllister, 2001) if it exists at all.[31]

Linebreeding is a form of inbreeding. There is no clear distinction between the two terms, but linebreeding may encompass crosses between individuals and their descendants or two cousins.[28][32] This method can be used to increase a particular animal’s contribution to the population.[28] While linebreeding is less likely to cause problems in the first generation than does inbreeding, over time, linebreeding can reduce the genetic diversity of a population and cause problems related to a too-small genepool that may include an increased prevalence of genetic disorders and inbreeding depression.[citation needed]

Outcrossing is where two unrelated individuals are crossed to produce progeny. In outcrossing, unless there is verifiable genetic information, one may find that all individuals are distantly related to an ancient progenitor. If the trait carries throughout a population, all individuals can have this trait. This is called the founder effect. In the well established breeds, that are commonly bred, a large gene pool is present. For example, in 2004, over 18,000 Persian cats were registered.[33] A possibility exists for a complete outcross, if no barriers exist between the individuals to breed. However it is not always the case, and a form of distant linebreeding occurs. Again it is up to the assortative breeder to know what sort of traits both positive and negative exist within the diversity of one breeding. This diversity of genetic expression, within even close relatives, increases the variability and diversity of viable stock.[34]

Laboratory animals

Systematic inbreeding and maintenance of inbred strains of laboratory mice and rats is of great importance for biomedical research. The inbreeding guarantees a consistent and uniform animal model for experimental purposes and enables genetic studies incongenic and knock-out animals. The use of inbred strains is also important for genetic studies in animal models, for example to distinguish genetic from environmental effects.


See also: Incest, Incest taboo, Pedigree collapse, and Cousin marriage

Possible increase of fertilityA study in Iceland by the deCODE genetics company, published by the journal Science, found that third cousins produced more children and grandchildren than more distant marriages, suggesting that "in spite of the fact that bringing together two alleles of a recessive trait may be bad, there may be some biological wisdom in the union of relatively closely related people".[35] For hundreds of years, inbreeding was historically unavoidable in Iceland due to its then tiny and isolated population.[36]
Royalty and nobility

See also: List of coupled cousins

Inter-nobility marriage was used as a method of forming political alliances among elites. These ties were often sealed only upon the birth of progeny within the arranged marriage. Thus marriage was seen as a union of lines of nobility, not of a contract between individuals as it is seen today.

Royal intermarriage was often practised among European royal families, usually for interests of state. Over time, due to the relatively limited number of potential consorts, the gene pool of many ruling families grew progressively smaller, until all European royalty was related. This also resulted in many being descended from a certain person through many lines of descent, such as the numerous European royalty and nobility descended from the British Queen Victoria or King Christian IX of Denmark.[37] The House of Habsburgwas infamous for its inbreeding, with the Habsburg lip cited as an ill-effect, although no genetic evidence has proved the allegation. The closely related houses of Habsburg, Bourbon, House of Braganza and Wittelsbach also engaged in first-cousin unions frequently and in double-cousin and uncle-niece marriages occasionally. Examples of incestuous marriages and the impact of inbreeding on royal families include:

  • In ancient Egypt, royal women carried the bloodlines and so it was advantageous for a pharaoh to marry his sister or half-sister;[38] in such cases a special combination between endogamy and polygamy is found. Normally the old ruler’s eldest son and daughter (who could be either siblings or half-siblings) became the new rulers. All rulers of the Ptolemaic dynasty from Ptolemy II were married to their brothers and sisters, so as to keep the Ptolemaic blood "pure" and to strengthen the line of succession. Cleopatra VII(also called Cleopatra VI) and Ptolemy XIII, who married and became co-rulers of ancient Egypt following their father’s death, are the most widely known example.[39]
  • Among European monarchies Jean V of Armagnac formed a rare brother-sister relationship. Also other royal houses, such as the Wittelsbachs had marriages among aunts, uncles, nieces and nephews.
  • One of the most famous examples of a genetic trait aggravated by royal family intermarriage was the House of Habsburg, which inmarried particularly often and is known for the mandibular prognathism of the Habsburger (Unter) Lippe (otherwise known as the ‘Habsburg jaw’, ‘Habsburg lip’ or ‘Austrian lip’"). This was typical for many Habsburg relatives over a period of six centuries.[40] The condition progressed through the generations to the point that the last of the Spanish Habsburgs, Charles II of Spain, could not properly chew his food.[41]
  • Besides the jaw deformity, Charles II also had a huge number of other genetic physical, intellectual, sexual, and emotional problems. It is speculated that the simultaneous occurrence in Charles II of two different genetic disorders: combined pituitary hormone deficiency and distal renal tubular acidosis could explain most of the complex clinical profile of this king, including his impotence/infertility which in the last instance led to the extinction of the dynasty.[42]
  • Francis II from the house of Habsburg-Lorraine married his double cousin Maria Theresa of Naples and Sicily, and several of their children had potentially genetic health problems. Their daughter Marie Anne is said to have suffered from a hideous facial deformity and also being mentally deficient. Their son Ferdinand who became an emperor was also mentally deficient and suffered from Hydrocephalus (meaning water head) which resulted in an enlarged head. He also had several seizures daily. Of course he never was capable of leading the empire and relied on others and abdicated during the difficulties of the Revolutions of 1848. When informed of the revolution he supposedly asked “But are they allowed to do that?” (Viennese German: Ja, dürfen’s denn des?) Also five of the children of Francis II died in infancy or early childhood.
  • Another famous genetic disease that circulated among European royalty was hemophilia. This spread to the royal families of Russia and Spain, and was a factor in the overthrow of both. Because the progenitor, Queen Victoria, was in a first cousin marriage, it is often believed that the cause was consanguinity (inbreeding). However, this disease (in males) is generally not aggravated by cousin marriages, although rare cases of hemophilia in girls can occur from the union of hemophiliac men and their cousins.[43][44]
  • Some Peruvian Sapa Incas married their sisters; in such cases a special combination between endogamy and polygamy is found. Normally the son of the old ruler and the ruler’s oldest (half-)sister became the new ruler. The Inca had an unwritten rule that the new ruler must be a son of the Inca and his wife and sister.
  • The Chakri Dynasty of Thailand has included marriages between cousins as well as more close relatives. The current king, Bhumibol Adulyadej is a first-cousin once removed of his wife, Sirikit, the two being respectively a grandson and a great-granddaughter ofChulalongkorn. The parents of the king’s father, Mahidol Adulyadej, were half-siblings, both being children of Mongkut by different mothers.
  • In the British royal family, marriages to other royals or the nobility and marriages between close relatives, even to first-cousins, was the norm until the generation of the children of the present monarch, Elizabeth II. Elizabeth and her husband Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh are third cousins as a result of both being directly descended from Queen Victoria; as well as second cousins once removed as a result of being directly descended from Christian IX of Denmark.[45] Queen Victoria herself had married her first cousin,Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Their nine children were married into royal and noble families across the continent, tying them together and earning her the nickname "the grandmother of Europe".

Today, royal intermarriage within European royal families has declined compared to past practice along with the power and prevalence of noble families and their importance in international affairs.

RH negs – 97% of Our DNA has been Disabled
I had trouble putting this up when I first started and could not figure out why, since then, after scheduling which was for 1:30 am for the benefit of the overseas readers, the time had been changed to 2 am, which then immediate put this behind the originally scheduled 2 am, resulting in many missing this altogether. 
So the harassment continues on those thing they do not want you to know. As I said, they are afraid of us for some reason.Anyway, no matter what they do to this, continue to read it. I am unable to continually monitor these blogs to ensure they stay clean, so help us out by reading them and telling us they are not OK so then we can fix it again.
Vatic Note:  This is the first real evidence that we have been "created" in the past, unless someone can come up with a better explanation of how "God" made us, then this should stand.   We have a part two coming up with even more information along these lines.  This was fascinating.
Work has been done on the "junk DNA" by european and Russian scientists and we did a blog on that, but what we did not have at the time this was done, was the fact that the Human Genome Project was going to map out every single thing in the human Genome, no matter what the reason, since I have my suspicions as to why they are doing it, but at least we get to find out what is in it and for that I am grateful.
This below makes some startling revelations about our genome compared to other species on the planet that are a lot less complex than we are.  What is the reason for that difference?   That is what this covers and involves RH negs even more than RH positives.
There were two creations, with the first being a lot less complex and when these slave workers turned out not to be all they could be in the production dept, they changed the DNA and added more to make them more than they were originally.  That is where the RH neg comes in. 
There is a whole series on this that we will be publishing which will truly expand our knowledge of just exactly what and who we are.  We need to know that because the evil ones are deathly afraid of us.  Why?  Read and you decide.
RH negs – 97% of Our DNA has been Disabled  – Part 1 of 2 -Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past?
by Michael Tellinger,  Bibliotecapleyades

The Human Genome Project has dished up some real surprises to scientists. The first surprise was the vast percentage of the human DNA that is inactive. It is estimated that at least 97% of our DNA is in actual fact a waste of space, as it does not contain any active genes that actually carry the code for any of our physical makeup.

Then within the genes there are Introns – parts that do not carry any code; and Exons – sections that carry some sort of genetic code. The full length of our DNA is made up of some 20 000 genes that have now been identified.

These genes carry the blueprint for the structure of our entire body. What is very puzzling is the fact that Homo sapiens, as the supposed pinnacle if civilized evolution on this planet, should have such large parts of unused DNA. We seem to have the longest DNA molecule among all other species, but we use the smallest part of it in proportion to the other species. In other words, all the other creatures use much more of their DNA than humans do. Some species use as much as 98% of their DNA. (VN:  after the experiments I have done, I believe we use so much less of our DNA out of ignorance.  We have no idea what we have that we have not  used.  Just in the simple act of healing without anything external, I was able to heal areas of my body that would have required either drugs to do or natural remedies, and I used neither and healed both.  Will discuss the specifics later as I find out more about why and how that happened, this is 5 months later and I am still fine.)

This flies directly in the face of the principles of evolution.
Humans should have the most complex and evolved DNA of all creatures, to have reached levels of civilization seemingly much higher than any other species on Earth over millions of years of evolution. What is even more curious is the predicted number of genes in species. The numbers seem to increase steadily from basic organisms to the most advanced. We would expect that humans should end up having most genes, but strangely this is not the case.

Here are some examples of the predictions for total number of genes in species.

  • Fruit Fly   21 000

  • Zebrafish  50 000

  • Chicken   76 000

  • Mouse     81 000

  • Chimp   130 000

  • Human    68 000

Can you see the problem here?

The Chimp is our closest known genetic relative and yet it has almost twice as many genes as humans.

And then we get to the anomaly of the chromosomes. Our DNA is broken up into23 pairs of chromosomes. By comparison, all apes have 24 pairs. One would expect that Homo erectus, our immediate evolutionary precursor would then also have had 24 chromosome pairs.

Just one year ago on 6 April 2005, researchers from the National Human Genome Research Institute announced that,

“A detailed analysis of chromosomes 2 and 4 has detected the largest “gene deserts” known in the human genome and uncovered more evidence that human chromosome 2 arose from the fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes” as reported in Nature.

It is also the second largest chromosome we possess and it seems to make no sense why 2 primordial chromosomes should have merged to make us human, if this new chromosome gives us no apparent advantage for survival.

So when we read in the Sumerian tablets that humans were cloned as a sub-species between Homo erectus and a more advanced human-like species that arrived on Earth some 400 000 years ago, it suddenly makes a little bit more sense. The tablets describe how our maker removed certain parts of the “Tree of life” to trim the ability of the new “creature” and how they struggled to make the perfect “primitive worker” so that it could understand commands but not be too smart to question their existence.

Similar suggestions of genetic cloning are made in The Koran and Hindu Laws of Manu.

The Koran:

• Ya Sin: “Is man not aware that We created him from a little germ?”
• The Believers – God says almost verbatim what the Sumerian tablets tell us. We first created man from an essence of clay; then placed him a living germ in a secure enclosure. The germ we made a clot of blood, and the clot a lump of flesh. This we fashioned into bones, then clothed the bones with flesh…”

Laws of Manu:

19. But from minute body (-framing) particles of these seven very powerful Purushas springs this (world), the perishable from the imperishable.
20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the quality of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the sequence) each of them occupies, even so many qualities it is declared to possess.

Notice the reference to “We” by the creator. The cloning of humans as a more primitive worker or “lulu amelu” suddenly does not seem so far fetched and the strange genetic anomalies seem to support some genetic manipulation in our distant past. The modern-day researchers go further to say that this “fusion” of our chromosome 2 is what makes us human.

Are we getting closer to proving that humans were created by his MAKER as slaves to work in the early gold mines on Earth? It certainly seems like it.
Michael Tellinger
April 2006


RH negs – 97% of Our DNA has been Disabled – Part 2 of 3 – The Mystery of Rh-Negative Blood Genetic Origin Unknown

Tuesday, August 13, 2013 4:44

(Before It’s News)

Vatic Note: This presentation is so much more than the usual.  It deeply gets into the royal lines of Europe and how the RH neg actually was not of “that” royal line, rather a different royal line that we do not know about.  He discusses the Beginning of it all and it was a bit of a surprise to me.

The other genome that we have was from apes, but that means another species of human, since the positives are from the family of apes.   This below also talks about the mixed and how that changes the percentages.   So you might be positive, but carry one RH neg gene with some of the characteristics.

This is fascinating for everyone regardless of blood factor.   As you know I am a science hobbyist.  I almost went that route in school but opted for political science instead.  That has helped me deal with all this that is going on in our country right now.

I can go back to science and art once we purge our government of the foreign occupiers who have declared war against us and like Iceland, we must purge them in order to ever get back into recovery.

The Mystery of Rh-Negative Blood Genetic Origin Unknown
by admin Here Be Dragons

Authenticity and legitimacy are based on factual history and the power of sacred history.


What Does the absence of Rhesus monkey factor mean?Picture

No solid scientific explanation exists as to how or why Rh- blood came about. It is presumed to be the result of a random mutation. Have you ever felt you were weird or different?

It may be due to your DNA … 85% of humans have the monkey gene (RH+) and 15% do not (RH-) and maybe have an alien gene instead.

RH- people are characterized by higher IQs, sensitive vision, lower body temperatures, sensitivity to heat and sunlight, psychic power, ability to stop watches and electrical appliances and having extra vertebrae. This film explores the possibility that we were bred as a slave race for labor, since 97% of our genetic code is disabled, with only 3% left for us to survive.
RH negative blood group is from ANNUNAKI heritage

Of the human blood types, O is the most common. It is a universal blood type. Blood types are further broken down into two groups, negative and positive. This is called the RH factor. The RH factor is the Rhesus (rhesus as in monkey) blood factor. If your blood tests positive for this, you have the factor in your blood. If you test negative, you do not have the factor in your blood. The RH factor is a protein found in the human blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.

When blood type is inherited from your parents, it is known that this factor element of the blood is the most consistent human or animal characteristic passed on to the off spring. There are VERY few aberrations. It rarely changes.

Most people, about 85%, have RH-positive blood. That could support the idea that humans evolved or were derived from Primates. 15 % of humans have RH-negative blood. If blood type is one of least mutable human characteristic, where did the RH negative come from?

This question has puzzled scientists for years. There is some evidence that suggests the RH-negative blood group may have appeared about 35,000 years ago. And the appearance was regional and seemed to, originally, be connected with certain groups/tribes of people.

Northern Spain and Southern France is where you can find some of the highest concentration of the RH-negative factor in the Basque people. Another original group were the Eastern/Oriental Jews. In general, about 40 – 45% of Europeans have the RH-negative group. Only about 3% of African descendent and about 1% of Asian or Native American descendent has the RH-negative group. Due to the larger European numbers, it is a safe bet that was where it was introduced into the human genetic code. Could this also be where the Caucasian was introduced? Is the introduction of Caucasian related to the RH-blood factor.

If the RH-negative factor is a ‘normal’ presentation of blood, then why is there a problem when a mother of the RH-negative blood group gives birth to an RH-positive blood group baby. This Hemolytic disease, actually an allergic reaction, can cause death when the two different blood groups are mingled during pregnancy. When the antigenic substances attack the negative blood group it can destroy the blood cells. So why does the human body produce antigens to this blood type? Is the blood group alien?

The only other time this occurs in nature is, as an example, when donkeys and horses are crossed to produce mules. This is not ‘natural’ because left alone in the wild, these animals would never cross breed. Only with intervention would this happen. Was there a cross breeding of two human like beings, similar but genetically different?

People with RH-negative blood group have certain characteristics that seem to be common among the majority. Here is a brief list of the most common.

¨ Extra vertebra.
¨ Higher than average IQ
¨ More sensitive vision and other senses.
¨ Lower body temperature
¨ Higher blood pressure
¨ Increased occurrence of psychic/intuitive abilities
¨ Predominantly blue, green, or Hazel eyes
¨ Red or reddish hair
¨ Has increased sensitivity to heat and sunlight
¨ Cannot be cloned
¨ Alien Abduction and other unexplained phenomenon

So what does this mean? What can be concluded?

The appearance of RH-negative blood did not follow the usual evolutionary path. In fact, evolution would seem to be ruled out as a possible cause of the anomaly. It has been proven that blood is the least likely to mutate. There are no other blood mutations. The introduction of the RH-negative blood type was not a naturally occurring part of human evolution.

This would lend credence that the RH-negative factor was introduced from an outside source. Could the source be from human like beings from another planet? Or maybe we are just as alien as they are, in that, we are a product of their manipulation and interference. Could they have come here and manipulated life forms already present on earth to create modern man?

Many ancient texts, including, the Bible, do support this theory. Many stories in the ancient texts, especially pre-Christian texts, do tell about a race that from the Heavens to the Earth Came. And they created man in their image. Man saw them as gods, living long lives and performing miracles. Flying about in the sky ships and shooting fire and creating ear-shattering booms. The humans watched as these gods built massive and glorious houses and created beautiful cities for themselves. From man’s primitive point of view, they were gods. But that was early man’s point of view.

Who were the gods? The ancient stories tell us a lot about these gods. They obviously had advanced technology capable of space travel and air travel. They knew about aviation, metallurgy, the universe, the cosmic progression, medicine and evidently genetics. They knew about atomic energy and weapons and used them. Evidence of this can be found on Earth. They knew about agriculture and how to create more nutritious grains and other food staples. All of the basic grains that humans rely on for food have been determined to have all appeared at the same time spanning roughly a 10,000 year period. A very short time, geologically speaking. And no new grain has since been developed.

Our ancient texts tell us they began to take humans for their spouses. The Bible says, and the gods looked upon woman and found her pleasant to behold and took her as their wives. They had children, many children. But not all humans were a result of interbreeding. The first human was a result of scientific research combining primates with the gods’ genes. The first humans were not a product of interbreeding. But small portions of humans are a result of this interbreeding and their blood type can support this.

In the first part of this article, I described to you what happens when two species who similar but genetically different interbreed. They produce hybrids. The example I gave was about horses, donkeys, and mules. Mules are the hybrid, the product of a union between a horse and a donkey. However, mules are born sterile because there is no genetic relationship between the horse and the donkey.

When humans were first created, they were a product of two genetically similar but not related species.

The combination of the DNA of the primates and the gods was produced ‘artificially’ in a lab. If the gods have the technology to create a new species, they would have no problem overcoming the problem of the hybrids being sterile. A little genetic manipulation and it would no longer be an issue.

Three proto types of humans were created. Each one successively more advanced. Two types by design and the last by chance. Neanderthal Man is suspected of being an early humanoid created by the gods but Cro-magnon was definitely a product of their intervention. The next type is whom we call pre-human and then we have modern man. Modern man was a result of interbreeding between the gods and pre-humans. This interbreeding for the most part created no problems in the resulting offspring, except for a line that inherited, from their godly parents, the RH-negative blood type.

This is supported by the fact that these humans did not inherit the protein found in the blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey. They did not inherit it because one of their parents did not have the monkey protein. This protein is present only because combining primate DNA with DNA from the gods created the original human proto-type that carried the monkey protein. So in conclusion, I suggest that man is a creation of a highly technological race of human like beings that From the Heavens to the Earth came. I suggest that these advanced beings are still among us today and are still very active in the affairs of man. To what end, I can only suggest.


Global Blood suppliers managed to infect or kill 90% of Hemophiliacs in world by providing them with tainted blood. If Hemophiliac is the “Royal Disease”, woe to generations of boys, who could not be king. Worldwide, over 120,000 men, women and boys…a true “genetic holocaust”…are now infected with HIV world wide…due to tainted blood transfusions At least 25,000 have died.

In some areas, the Rh-Negative blood factor is referred to as “Blood Royale” or “Royal Blood”. For centuries, European royalty have been inflicted with Hemophilia or “bleeders disease”. Apparently, Queen Victoria was a “carrier” of Hemophilia and gave it to all of her children who then intermarried and infected the bloodlines of very throne in Europe during the 1800s and 1900s.

As a direct result, Hemophilia became known as the “Royal Disease”. To keep this in perspective, only about 5% of all “royalty” have Rh-Factor negative blood…which means “less than the general population. That would indicate that the vast majority of “rulers” and “monarchs” are NOT Rhesus-factor negative. Is this by chance? or by genetic engineering called “arranged marriages”?

For all practical purposes the cultural group with the highest rates of Rh-negative blood are the “Berbers” of Morocco. In an earlier meme, i indicated that the highest concentration of Rh-Factor Negative was from Iraq. It seems that the Berbers may actually have originated thousands of years ago, from the border of Syria and Iraq.

If European royalty are no disposed to intermarriage with Rh-Negs, it may be because they are avoiding the “arab” bloodline? Let’s not get ahead of ourselves. It appears that the Basque Rh-neg factors come from ancient Berber sea farers as early as 8,000 BC! Perhaps, many of the “cave paintings” may be attributed to “strangers” of great artistic ability that migrated into the area.

Is “hyper-creativity” a “symptom” of Rh-Negative Blood? Artists? Entertainers? Who knows…but if European Royalty refuse to marry into the Rh Negative blood line it means one thing…Rh-Neg people are a “competing royal line”.

How do you get rid of it once and for all? Although the British would love for you to think that Victoria was the world’s first carrier…don’t be confused. It was he Hapsburg’s disease. Was Victoria a Hapsburg?

The unofficial motto of the Hapsburg family was “Bella gerunt alii, tu, felix Austria, nubes!” (”Where others must fight wars, you, fortunate Austria, marry!).

It’s curious that “marriage” can be a “dynastic” undertaking but it can also be a perverse form of “bio-warfare” or “genetic warfare”. In fact, the disease was much more ancient.

The “Father of Surgery” was El Zarhawi or Albucasis, 1013-1106. Albucasis described a family where only males died from blood loss after the most trivial of injury.

His full name was Abul Qasim Khalaf ibn al-Abbas al-Zahravi. He was born and brought up in Zahra (zorro?) , the royal suburb of Cordova (Arabic Qurtuba), the capital of Muslim Spain. As we know from the history, Zahra competed in grandeur and magnificence with Baghdad. Al-Zahravi served in the capacity of the court physician to King Al-Hakam-II of Spain. After a long and distinguished medical career he died in 1013 C.E.

As an inventor of many surgical instruments, Al-Zahravi is famous for developing instruments for internal examination of the ear, internal inspection of the urethra and for applying or removing foreign bodies from the throat. He introduced such new procedures as cauterization of wounds, crushing stones inside the bladder, the vivisection and dissection.

He applied cauterization procedure to as many as 50 different operations. In addition, Al-Zahravi discussed the preparation of medicines and the application of such techniques as sublimation and decantation. He prescribed the use of diuretics, sudorifics, purgatives, the absorption of pure wine and hot baths. Al-Zahravi was the first to give detailed description hemophilia and was the first to use silk thread for stitching wounds.

So, you begin to wonder if the good doctor was treating an “Arab” family in Moorish Spain for the disease. Then you begin to wonder just where a supposed blue blood like Victoria got her “Arab Royalty Disease”??? Was it a disease of Spanish Royalty?

In other words, was marriage to Victoria’s daughters a way to kill or weaken future “non-Hapsburg” kings…since mostly males only contract the disease from their mothers? Still, Hemophilia was in Royalty long before Victoria.

Victoria’s daughters passed the disease into the Spanish, German and Russian Royal lines and threatened the thrones of all of Europes major powers. It would appear that Victoria is actually a direct descendant of Ferdinand of Castille, who retook he city of Castille in 1236, where the surgeon Abulcasis had counseled King Hakam II about a family who’s sons died easily.

What’s the connection between Hemophilia, Rh-Negative, AIDS and Royal Blood?


As you can see the vast majority of RH- people come from the Basque people of France and Spain, and then Europe has the second highest percentage.  We can surmise that the RH- blood type originates out of Europe and has spread over to other countries that contain European ancestry heritage.  The RH- recessive alleles (+/-) make up approximately 60% of the Basque people and 40% of the Europeans, so that means that a higher percentage of RH+ people in Europe are carrying the genetics of the RH- factor in their DNA.


“No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from. Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor. If we are a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.

The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. The average among most people is only 15%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little. The Oriental Jews of Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritans and the Black Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.

The Basque people are also known for having the oldest language in Europe, and the origins of the Basque language are unknown.  The languages in neighboring countries in Europe show no resemblance to the Basque language, so this has become a real mystery to the linguist.

The Celtic people of Ireland and Great Britain also have high incidences of the RH- factor and it has recently been proven that there is a genetic link between the Basque and the Celts.  This research proves that the Celtic people came from the Basque regions of France and Spain and a group must have migrated over to the islands of Great Britain.  With this research I can surmise that my family got this distinct blood type from our French and Irish ancestry roots.


Genes link Celts to Basques

The Welsh and Irish Celts have been found to be the genetic blood-brothers of Basques, scientists have revealed.

The gene patterns of the three races passed down through the male line are all “strikingly similar”, researchers concluded.

‘Statistically indistinguishable’

He and his colleagues looked at Y-chromosomes, passed from father to son, of Celtic and Norwegian populations. They found them to be quite different.

“But we also noticed that there’s something quite striking about the Celtic populations, and that is that there’s not a lot of genetic variation on the Y-chromosome,” he said.

To try to work out where the Celtic population originally came from, the team from UCL, the University of Oxford and the University of California at Davis also looked at Basques.

“On the Y-chromosome the Celtic populations turn out to be statistically indistinguishable from the Basques,” Professor Goldstein said.

Why are people calling RH negatives “blue bloods”?  Well, again a peculiar thing happens between an RH- mother and a second RH+ baby.  As you may remember an RH- mother builds up antibodies against the RH+ baby, and this means that the babies blood will start to agglutinate.  Before the rhoGAM shot, babies were born blue and they needed to have blood transfusions to survive.

Blue blood is an expression from the Spanish phrase “sangre azul,” indicating noble birth or descent. This is said to derive from the fact that the native Spanish had fairer skin, which displays veins more prominently, than people of Arab origin. After the Moorish occupation of Spain, intermarriage occurred. The result seems to have been that the aristocracy, particularly certain families in Castille, who would not mix with the Moors, showed rather bluer blood vessels (in, for example, the back of the hand) than the ordinary folk.

So the phrase blue blood came to refer to the blood which flowed in the veins of the oldest and most aristocratic families. The phrase was taken over into English in the 1830s. By the time Anthony Trollope used it in The Duke’s Children in 1880, it had become common:

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.



Report abuse


The Star Larvae Hypothesis
Conspiracy_New World Order

Nature’s Plan for Humankind
Addendum: The Sociobiology of The New World Order (and the Conspiracy of Sociobiology)

The Sociobiology of The New World Order (and the Conspiracy of Sociobiology)

Sociobiology explains social organization in naturalistic terms, But it remains taboo to apply it to humans, because it implies that human society is stratified genetically. Conspiracy theories step in to concur that the ruling class indeed is an inbreeding elite. Anyone uncomfortable with the notion is free to dismiss it as "conspiracy theory." Nonetheless, genetic stratification, sets the stage for speciation.

Conspiracy theories occupy a peculiar place among the cultural storefronts. They are disreputable, because, like peep shows, they reveal naughty bits. At least they purport to reveal the naughty bits—of the body politic. Conspiracy theories titillate by inviting gawkers to indulge taboo thoughts: Who’s really in charge? And how do they maintain control? Respectable folk steer clear; conspiracy talk will tarnish your reputation.

Pleasure peddlers of various stripes, shamed and shunned, defend the legitimacy of their enterprises. And, like pornographers, conspiracy theorists have found new audiences on the Internet. With a few keystrokes, anyone can retrieve and ogle any version of events, any alternative history, that tweaks his or her fantasies.

The events of 9/11, for example, continue to provide fodder. The peculiarities surrounding 911 serve as paranoid steroids for conspiracy enthusiasts. Whatever the merits of the evidence and arguments of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth and similar groups, the 911 material is fruit of one branch of the grand conspiratorial family tree.

"What I am asserting is that in this particular epoch a conjunction of historical circumstances has led to the rise of an elite of power; that the men of the circles composing the elite, severally and collectively, now make such key decisions as are made; and that, given the enlargement and centralization of the means of power now available, the decisions that they make and fail to make carry more consequences for more people than has ever been the case in the world history of mankind."

—- C. Wright Mills
The Power Elite

The Ruling Bloodline

Fundamental to conspiracy theories is the notion that operating behind the visible political class an oligarchy exercises ultimate control. Conspiracy theorists identify the pinnacle of power typically with two interlocked groups: (1) the royal families of Europe (possibly tracing ancestry back to the pharaohs) and (2) international banking and finance, which operates in the United States through Wall Street and the Federal Reserve and internationally through the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Bank for International Settlements. Freemasons, Rosicrucians, the Knights Templar, Skull and Bones and other secret societies are cast in various supporting roles that weave through plots involving Jesuits, Zionists, and the CIA and its international counterparts. Conspiracy theorists, such as Alex Jones and Webster Tarpley, present mainstream conspiracy theories that adhere roughly to this model. (The mainstream theories stop short of bringing inextraterrestrial reptiles, entities from the hollow Earth, and that sort of thing.)

As a first approximation, conspiracy theorists note that the wealthy help each other out. Wealthy people find private opportunities to work toward common goals, that is, to conspire. But such conspiring applies to the sheet metal worker and the school teacher as much as it does to the secretary of commerce and the chairman of the Federal Reserve. People of all stripes naturally find ways to cooperate with others with whom they rub elbows day to day.

"’The American elite’ is a confused and confusing set of images, and yet when we hear or when we use such words as Upper Class, Big Shot, Top Brass, The Millionaire Club, The High and Mighty, we feel at least vaguely that we know what they mean, and often do. What we do not often do, however, is connect each of these images with the others; we make little effort to form a coherent picture in our minds of the elite as a whole. Even when, very occasionally, we do try to do this, we usually come to believe that it is indeed no ‘whole’; that, like our images of it, there is not one elite, but many, and that they are not really connected with one another. What we must realize is that until we do try to see it as a whole, perhaps our impression that it may not be is a result merely of our lack of analytic rigor and sociological imagination."

—- C. Wright Mills
The Power Elite

The next level of conspiratorial thinking asserts, more perniciously, that the upper circles of the control elite constitute a coterie of related bloodlines. The power elite constitutes not only an invisible ruling class, but an inbreeding one. An Anglo-American genetic elite, a de facto dynasty, maintains control over the United States and Europe according to the hardline conspiracy theorists. In this view of the control structure, the American political class extends the system of British peerage.

The idea is not entirely unfounded. A quick search on the Internet reveals family ties among theBush and Kerry and the Cheney and Obama families, with links to Winston Churchilland European royalty and see THIS. (You got it. Wikipedia just decided to delete these pages. The pages were on the site for years, but, you know, the family trees of U.S. presidents just aren’t interesting enough to warrant precious server space over at Wikipedia.) Even Scott Brown, the Republican elected in 2010 to fill Ted Kennedy’s U.S. Senate seat, is related to Barack Obama. Such coincidences typically are treated as light fare. But the proportions of royal genes that the candidates carry does correspond eerily to the outcomes of presidential races.


But isn’t a blueblood ruling elite the most naturalistic model of human social organization?

Genes naturally will stratify in a large society, with those correlated with certain physical and mental aptitudes clustering at different levels in the social pyramid. In a technological society, genes that predispose individuals toward proficiency in managerial strategy and toward charisma, confidence and persuasiveness, and a certain Machiavellian callousness will tend to percolate to the top of the hierarchy, eventually supplanting genes that predispose individuals toward proficiency in, say, hunting or swordsmanship. Such genetic stratification is to be expected if natural selection shapes the evolution of social species. If one takes evolution theory seriously, then an implication for Homo sapiens is the emergence of a more or less genetically coherent ruling class.

Racists and elitists can cast socioeconomic stratification in terms of a genetic merit system, in which elevated socioeconomic status is claimed to derive from meritorious cognitive and/or behavioral predispositions that derive from genes. But at the end of the day, people’s strong tendency to mate with socioeconomic peers minimizes mixing across socioeconomic strata and ends up producing the same stratification that elites might rationalize in racist terms.

"Let us now consider man in the free spirit of natural history, as though we were zoologists from another planet completing a catalog of social species on Earth. In this macroscopic view the humanities and social sciences shrink to specialized branches of biology; history, biography, and fiction are the protocols of human ethology; and anthropology and sociology together constitute the sociobiology of a single primate species."

—- Edward O. Wilson

Genes and socioeconomic rank are destined to stratify coextensively. And the stratification to a significant degree will be self perpetuating. And this is just to say that people tend to mate within their own socioeconomic class.

Genes, Race and Eugenics

A controversial form of sociological naturalism is called sociobiology, a science of social behavior built on evolutionary biology and genetics. Harvard entomologist Edward O. Wilson coined the term while developing an evolutionary model of animal societies. Wilson focused initially on social insects, then extrapolated the principles he developed to account for other social species. In his book Sociobiology, he argues that social behaviors evolve in those situations in which sociality confers a survival advantage. Simple Darwinism. Genes that predispose individuals toward sociality will tend to proliferate where they bestow an advantage. (Or, say the Darwin doubters, they will tend to proliferate where they proliferate.)

Sociobiology is not particularly controversial when applied to social insects or wolf packs, but applied to human beings the science aggravates sensitive nerves. Any model of human society that references genes will attract racists. Social reforms cannot resolve social class inequities, the racist argues, because the inequities are grounded—presumably unalterably—in biology. Any sociological theory that leans heavily on biology potentially legitimizes this kind of racist thinking. (Perhaps in response to such concerns, the academic world has sidelined the term sociobiology, in favor of evolutionary psychology. The justification apparently being that "social behavior arises, in a complex social context, from the psychological dispositions of individuals. Those psychological dispositions are themselves shaped not only by underlying genotypes, but also by the social and cultural environments in which people develop." — quote from The Trouble with Scientism, by Philip Kitcher in The New Republic, 5/4/2012.)

Wilson faced the issue firsthand when he published his ideas about sociobiology. Colleagues on the Harvard campus in effect accused him of racism. Wilson describes the fallout of this episode in his book Promethean Fire, which is a summary of an earlier work, Genes, Mind, And Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. In these books, Wilson and coauthor Charles Lumsden expand the sociobiological model to include culture among evolutionary selection pressures.

Sociobiology has a notorious predecessor that overtly emboldened racists: eugenics. During the early twentieth century, foundations and think tanks became preoccupied with applying Darwinian logic to improving the genetic profile of human beings. The Rockefeller Foundation, Carnegie Institution and other moneyed interests funded programs to promote selective breeding and the sterilization of carriers of "inferior" genes. Eugenic thinking took root and grew into organized movements in the United States and Britain, becoming a respectable part of civic life. Offshoots of the Rockefeller- and Carnegie-funded programs encouraged eugenics projects in Hitler’s Germany. Eugenics as official policy reached its tragic culmination in the genocidal savagery of the Nazis. But eugenic thinking infects policy still today, as when World Bank loans to third-world countries come with population-control strings attached. Wikipedia provides a basic introduction to the history of, and fallout from, the twentieth century’s eugenics movement.

Eugenics Family Tree

"Eugenics is the self-direction of human evolution": Logo from the Second International Eugenics Conference, 1921, depicting eugenics as a tree that unites a variety of disciplines.

A Natural Conspiracy

"Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."

—- Bertrand Russell
The Impact of Science on Society

How beehives and ant hills stay organized is not well understood. These insect societies lack universities, courts and public works departments. Maybe such institutions are more ornamental than foundational, and occult forces shape society. According to sociobiology, the secret cabal that pulls the strings comprises genes. Hard to identify, communicating in code, selfish genes act with some disregard toward the disposable, unwitting bodies that they manipulate. Clannish, genes mingle with their own kind and screen outsiders who petition for admission to the inner circles. Their machinations establish and manage human sociopolitical hierarchies. Heh-heh.

The star larvae hypothesis accommodates a naturalistic, if not necessarily sinister, account of social organization, because the hypothesis regardsevolution as a developmental unfolding, programmed in whatever genetically managed way life cycles of organisms are programmed. By extension, the developmental narrative of human history should fall under the same rubric as that of ontogenetic development. To exile sociobiology from accounts of human social history, because it potentially emboldens racists, is to turn from the most naturalistic to other kinds of accounts.

Human societies differ from those of the ant or bee or wolf in a critical way: They develop in a feedback loop with their technologies in a way that protects the genetic elite from excessive inbreeding. Perpetuating an elite at the top of the control hierarchy requires maintenance. Excessive inbreeding has undermined more than one long-lived dynasty. Western society does not acknowledge overtly its caste system, yet genetic mixing between, say, the top 20 percent and the bottom 20 percent of the socioeconomic spread would seem to be minimal. The vast majority of people who find mates choose partners from their own social class. Human social organization in the context of evolution and sociobiology must include a tension between patriciate inbreeding to refine the elite pool and the admission of new genes to avoid excessive inbreeding.

"Reduction is the traditional instrument of scientific analysis, but it is feared and resented. If human behavior can be reduced and determined to any considerable degree by the laws of biology, then mankind might appear to be less than unique and to that extent dehumanized. Few social scientists and scholars in the humanities are prepared to enter such a conspiracy, let alone surrender any of their territory."

—- Edward O. Wilson
On Human Nature

Stir the Genetic Pot

Karl Marx observed that technologies upset class relations, but he lived too early to formulate the observation in genetic terms. Technology dampens the threat of excessive inbreeding in elite lines by creating profitable enterprises and thereby economically elevating the genes of successful entrepreneurs and their investors. Some genetic drift at the interface of the elite gene pool and that of high-ranking commoners is bound to occur spontaneously. But technologies facilitate this mixing by creating a class of nouveau riche from which the elite circles can draw recruits. This economic elevation creates an opportunity for lower class genes to climb socially, because it buys access to the Ivy League schools and other institutionswhere old bloodlines review applicants to the upper ranks. The country clubs, philanthropic societies, and private schools serve as conduits up through which genes of the newly rich can percolate. For example, the Skull and Bones secret society at Yale University apparently serves this vetting function. Wikipedia acknowledges a history of such recruitments:

Active recruitment of rich new blood was also a character of some more flexible patriciates, which drew in members of the mercantile elite, through ad hoc partnerships in ventures, which became more permanently cemented by marriage alliances. "In such cases an upper group, part feudal-aristocratic, part mercantile would arise, a group of mixed nature like the ‘magnates’ of Bologna, formed of nobles made bourgeois by business, and bourgeois ennobled by city decree, both fused together in law."[10]

By placing the means of production into new hands, technology facilitates marrying up.

Whether stratified genes associated with stratified social rank might ever spin off a terrestrial post-human species seems doubtful. But the possibility has not escaped the literary imagination. H. G. Wells described a prospective outcome of post-human speciation in his novel, The Time Machine. In the story, an inventor, designated only as The Time Traveler, journeys to the year 802,701; where he finds a world in which humanity has split into two species. The Morlocks, descendants of the working class, inhabit a subterranean world and have degenerated into brutes. The descendants of the managerial class, the Eloi, haveevolved neotenously—becoming androgynous, small of stature, and sporting big eyes—and enjoy an idyllic life of playful innocence. Having failed to move off-planet, they become easy prey and constitute the Morlock diet, in a Marxist fantasy of poetic justice.

Stratification of genes by class will tend also to coincide with stratification by geography, a coincidence that lays the groundwork for speciation, particularly if the stratification includes an extreme geographical separation, such as that between Earth and space..

Eugenics (1)

The End of Evolution?

Some thinkers propose that human biological evolution has ceased and been supercede by cultural evolution. Philosopher Richard Rorty favored this interpretation. In Philosophy and Social Hope he asserts,

"The story of how we got from Neanderthal grunts and nudges to German philosophical treatises is no more discontinuous that the story of how we got from the amoebae to the anthropoids. The two stories are parts of one larger story. Cultural evolution takes over from biological evolution without a break."

"We now have a global overclass which makes all the major economic decisions, and makes them in entire independence of the legislatures, and a fortiori of the will of the voters, of any given country. The money accumulated by this overclass is as easily used for illegal purposes, such as supplying land mines to the latest entrepreneurial warlord or financing gangster takeovers of trade unions, as it is for legal ones. The absence of a global polity means that the super-rich can operate without any thought of any interests save their own."

—- Richard Rorty
Philosophy and Social Hope

"Almost everywhere in America, the metropolitan upper classes have in common, more or less, race, religion, and nativity. Even if they are not of long family descent, they are uniformly of longer American origin than the underlying population. There are, of course, exceptions, some of them important exceptions. In various cities, Italian and Jewish and Irish Catholic families—having become wealthy and powerful—have risen high in status. But however important, these are still exceptions: the model of the upper socialclasses is still ‘pure’ by race, by ethnic group, by national extraction. In each city, they tend to be Protestant; moreover Protestants of class-church denominations, Episcopalian mainly, or Unitarian, or Presbyterian."

—- C. Wright Mills
The Power Elite

With ease of travel stirring the gene pool geographically and modern medicine keeping genes in circulation that otherwise would be filtered out, the case can be made that modernity undermines the genetic stratification that encourages evolution. Ergo, the case can be made that the torch of human advancement has been passed from biological adapters to cultural innovators.

This is the point of view underscored in a New York Times article, "Evolution of Humans May at Last Be Faltering," (Mar. 14, 1995, p. B10):

"A number of experts say that Homo sapiens is becoming increasingly disengaged from the forces of natural selection and speciation, the key processes that brought humankind into existence. [. . . .] Humans, some evolutionists say, have wrapped themselves in such a snug cocoon, from clothing to central heating to hurricane warning systems, that populations are largely insulated from the environmental stresses that drive evolution. Technology and medicine also tend to cancel out inherited genetic defects. [. . . .] Humans are intermixing more than ever before, marrying people born in locations farther away and generally eliminating the isolation of populations that leads to speciation."

The article quotes Ian Tattersall, a paleoanthropologist at New York’s American Museum of Natural History, from his book, The Fossil Trail: "Homo sapiens today is in a mode of intermixing rather than of differentiation, and the conditions for significant evolutionary change simply don’t exist—and won’t, short of some all-too-imaginable calamity."

Harvard Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould apparently shared the view that evolutionary pressures no longer apply to the human species. Commenting on genetic mixing among geographically separated populations, he says in the same article, "We are not likely to speciate unless we send up some space colonies." Gould never cultivated his fertile insight.

Or, the Acceleration of Evolution?

But evolution-is-over conclusions sidestep the issue of adaptation. Evolution is supposed to involve adaptation to environments. So long as environments change, evolution will have to proceed. Otherwise, the theory is incoherent. Technology not only modifies environments, but does so radically and at an accelerating rate. As a result, humans should be evolving faster, which is what more recent research reveals.

An AP article from January 2008 summarizes the new thinking: "Science fiction writers have suggested a future Earth populated by a blend of all races into a common human form. In real life, the reverse seems to be happening. People are evolving more rapidly than in the distant past, with residents of various continents becoming increasingly different from one another, researchers say." An audio interview with one of the researchers is available HERE. (Curiously, no one seems to want to comment on the lack of mixing among socioeconomic strata.)

NEWSWEEK (Jan 28, 2008, p.49) summarized the findings this way, "A study published in the December Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences found that not only are humans still evolving, but we are doing so at a faster rate than ever before, with genes that affect our diets and brains leading the race. [. . . .] The findings have turned some traditional assumptions on their heads." (Curiously, no one seems to want to comment on the lack of mixing among socioeconomic strata.)

This is an odd turn of events. How many sciences, in making predictions and establishing their street cred, enjoy so much leeway to get things so wrong? How can evolution theory get away with predictions that oscillate so wildly—from the cessation of human evolution to its acceleration—within the span of a single generation of researchers? Can a theory so erratic in its conclusions rest on a solid theoretical ground? (Then again, a profligate prognosticator is bound to get something right.)

Modes of Speciation

Geographic illustration of SPATIAL ASPECTS OF SPECIATION:
1. allopatric speciation – physical barrier divides population
2. peripatric speciation – small founding population enters isolated niche
3. parapatric speciation – new niche found adjacent to original one
4. sympatric speciation – speciation occurs without physical separation

But let’s give the wobbly theory a break and work within the accepted paradigm.

Speciation in normal evolutionary theory is thought to occur by various modes, which have in common a small inbreeding population that develops within or geographically separated from its parent population. The geographical separation of the space colony from Earth would seem to create the perfect opportunity for speciation to occur. And it must be more likely to occur if an isolated group, such as in a space colony, represents a genetically thin slice of the parent population, rather than a broad cross section (see also, "the founder effect.") The diagram above illustrates various modes of genetic separation that can lead to speciation. 

The prospective New World Order of which conspiracy theorists warn might not be of this world at all. The prospect of elite genes conspiring to escape Earth to form extraterrestrial societies has occurred to at least one conspiracy theorist (and probably countless science fiction fans). In this video, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones concludes his assessment of the power elite’s eugenics campaigns by raising the specter of an elite flight from Earth, involving immortal transhumanists. (For all his ingenuity in connecting the dots, Jones fails to note that transhuman [or post-human] immortality in Heaven is also the central theme and promise of the Christian faith to which he says he subscribes.)

The naturalness of human societies does not mean that cruelty from the ruling elite should be tolerated or rationalized in terms of a "natural order." An ethic of noblesse oblige seems a reasonable expectation to impose on privileged classes. Munificence needs to stand in opposition to social Darwinism and eugenics. Why shouldn’t the natural order’s natural ethic be one of largesse, to keep the peace if nothing else? Popular revolutions might be the natural corrective to abuses of power. Conspiracy theories, then, might have value as a social safety valve, because they vent intrigues and frustrations that otherwise would fester. The taboo against conspiracy theories mitigates against inspections of the status quo. In so doing it stabilizes society.

Then again, maybe it’s time the naughty bits at the top of the pyramid were exposed, in their full anatomical correctness. Maybe it’s time for the body politic to treat the citizenry to a sociopolitical Full Monty and leave nothing to the imagination. Then democratic ideals might seize the opportunity to re-invigorate themselves..

NEXT > Epilog: The Meaning of Purpose

Bush Clinton Kennedy Conspiracy


The Star Larvae Hypothesis:

Stars constitute a genus of organism. The stellar life cycle includes a larval phase. Biological life constitutes the larval phase of the stellar life cycle.

Elaboration: The hypothesis presents a teleological model of nature, in which

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.







Royal Family’s Inbreeding Reveals Marvel of Evolution


By Kate Seamons,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 22, 2013 9:22 AM CDT

Habsburg kings. 

Habsburg kings.

(NEWSER) – Scientists have been able to study the effects of inbreeding on plants and animals in detail; when it comes to humans, not so much. As Nature explains, there isn’t exactly endless data on generation after generation of inbred families—with at least one notable exception. A new study published this month in Hereditylooks at inbreeding in the Habsburg royal family, known for cousins (and uncles/nieces) who did far more than kiss. What the researchers assert: natural selection went to work to weed out the worst effects of the practice. AsNature explains, "evolutionary theory predicts such a ‘purging’ process," and the researchers tried to root out its presence by documenting infant (under age one, not counting miscarriages and stillbirths) and childhood (through age 10) deaths.

Their expectation was that these young deaths would be the result of inbreeding; if the death rate decreased over time, that would indicate that natural selection was in fact weeding out the "deleterious alleles." And researchers say they found evidence of just that, kind of: Mortality among children decreased significantly when comparing the periods 1450-1600 and 1600-1800; among infants, however, there was an increase. The researchers believe that might be because almost-always harmful mutations (like the one responsible for cystic fibrosis) would be eliminated more rapidly than those that cause problems infrequently, and infants may have fallen victim to the latter. But not all geneticists are in agreement. Says one, "Our data would suggest that the major adverse effect of consanguineous marriage is expressed in the first year of life." The Habsburgs’ final heir, who had no fewer than 17 names, died just two years ago.


Gemini Press

Elite Agenda and "M-O"

The power Elite’s deep manipulation and control of human societies.

General Description

If you are new to the idea of the "power Elite," this page introduces their nature and methods. This is not a heavily "resourced" or referenced page, but an impression of the Elite that has accrued over time from various sources and experiences. There are some examples and references.

This overview will give the reader a ‘model’ to apply to news events and political situations to see things from a wider perspective–just for the fun of it, if nothing else.

If you give it a try, you may begin to enjoy this expanded view of things and become less bound by deception and convention. "Hidden" history, like that revealed by investigative journalists like Antony Sutton, Kevin Phillips, Pete Drewton, and David Icke, is laden with proven conspiracies. You will come to understand that "conspiracy" is not a dirty word, but one that has been ‘made dirty’ by clever disinformers trying to cover tracks. Many conspiracies have been proven beyond doubt.
33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True, What Every Person Should Know…

Most of the world’s major chaos, especially war, but including poverty, is symptomatic of Elite manipulation and control of human societies. Chaos arises from the scenarios and secret operations (conspiracies) that are designed to advance the Elite Agenda of global domination and human enslavement. They are creating an ever-tightening control system—a la George Orwell’s 1984, but ‘on steroids.’ Everyone should read it.

Here is a much deeper analysis [off-site link, new tab/window]. Though not as deep as things get, this one has some good documentation (but flaws as well). Even with flaws, however, it serves well as an overview for people breaking into the conspiratorial view of history, and as a ‘working hypothesis’ for those who wish to explore further on their own.

Be aware that there are varying views on the nature and scope of the Elite. For example, the preceding link says they’ve been active for about a hundred years, whereas others say centuries, even thousands of years. I hold to the latter view.

The Elite comprise a relatively small percentage of Earth’s population, but they control many more individuals who serve them, knowingly and not. They comprise a group of ancient bloodlines—families, in other words—that consider themselves the "ruling class" and reserve that power to the group (obscene wealth as well). For this reason they tend to interbreed (sometimes even inbreeding), so that the gene pool has remained relatively intact for centuries. Old European aristocracy, or royalty, is a good example. Their central belief is their ‘divine right’ to rule and control societies. They prefer covert to overt control, however, and fear widespread exposure. Thus, they control the media.

Elite influence and control cross all party lines and most international ones. Dubya Bush and John Kerry are cousins. The bloodlines of thirty-four American presidents can be traced back to two men: King Alfred the Great and Charlemagne.

In 871 AD, Alfred became king of the West Saxons and overlord of Kent, Surrey, Sussex, and Essex. One claim to "fame": he issued his own code of laws, which contained measures for a stronger centralized monarchy (sound familiar?)

On Christmas Day, 800, Charlemagne was crowned emperor by the Pope. Charlemagne’s coronation legitimized his rule over the former Roman empire in Western Europe, which by then was the Holy Roman Empire (which wasn’t holy, but that’s another tale).

The bloodlines coordinate policy and power in the political and business/banking arenas via a nexus of secret societies wherein players are groomed and ‘conditioned’ before being placed into key positions in society, including groups such as foundations and think-tanks (Council on Foreign Relations, for example).

One secret society is Freemasonry (only the very highest levels/rites are in the know—most members are unaware). Another is the Order of Skull & Bones. The Rosicrucians and Knights Templar are also examples.

Once you understand the Elite structure, Agenda, code of conduct, and how they operate in the world, you can begin to see major geopolitical events and societal organization and ills in a new light. Please know that I have no illusions about human nature, such that I think we are incapable of doing to ourselves what I impute to the Elite. But they understand human nature very thoroughly, and then ‘amp up’ the worst aspects of it and set people against one another in numerous ways. They also turn the better aspects of human nature against people—generosity, love, national loyalty, and so on. The latter helps them to convince people to sacrifice the young in war.

Understanding the Elite is critical. It can be very helpful, especially, for example, for someone considering military service, or for citizens who tend to believe the Government without question, and see fit to support the rationale for war, which is a racket, according to one of the most highly decorated US Marines of all time.

The Elite operate ostensibly legitimate businesses, but use their wealth and organization to usurp governments and pose as patriots therein. One of their favorite tactics is to be on BOTH SIDES of most conflicts (more below). So, heavy wool is being pulled.

To the Elite, soldiers are mere fodder, and their courage and honor is used for evil covered over with platitudes about patriotism and sacrifice. There is no better example than the horrendous poisoning of our troops with vaccines, chemicals, anddepleted-uranium (perhaps even enriched-uranium) munitions, as in Desert Storm. And the best word to describe what was done to Iraq—on false pretenses—is "satanic."

When I say the Elite are Satanists, it means behaviorally, not in the sense of belief in/worship of that alleged being. But it has been suggested that they promote Satanism and are behind blood-ritual cults (quite likely, many child disappearances). And they are occultists, to whom numbers and astrological configurations are vitally important for guiding the timing of their operations.

Many artifical categories and belief systems have been and are created in order to utilize the age-old tactic of ‘divide and conquer. People are set against one another for ostensibly legitimate, honorable, or defensive purposes, but in reality to serve Elite interests.

• If no person would pick up a weapon to kill another in war, Elite power would dissipate considerably.
• If police and military personnel understood just whom they’re protecting when they defend ‘the state,’ the Elite’s control of government would be undone. For example, a soldier is sworn to protect the Constitution from domestic enemies. But the domestic enemies, who are Elites or their operatives in positions of seemingly ‘legitimate’ power, focus attention elsewhere by demonizing external enemies. This is exactly the technique used by the Nazis and spoken of by Hermann Goering:

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY.

If the military were to follow their oath, they would be storming Washington to arrest most of the Government.
• To prevent information from surfacing that would lead to either of the above two things happening, propaganda and ‘perception management’ are used extensively. Perception management has become really big business. Much of this is done via the mainstream media, but it is created by PR corporations and handed off.

Already mentioned is the particularly cruel ‘irony’ that, in many cases, the same underlying influence drives both sides of conflict (Israeli/Palestine conflict is a prime example—Sharon and Arafat were both Elite servants staging a deadly game). Not only that, but in modern times, the complexly interwoven international corporate/banking cartel effectively sells war materiel to all sides. In effect, ‘one’ company supported the Axis and Allied powers.

‘Legitimate’ Wall Streeters worked with Lenin and Trotzky to fund the Bolshevik Revolution and create the perfect enemy of America. American industrialists, bankers, and many corporations (such as IBM) were also instrumental in building the Soviet industrial/military machine all during the Cold War. This is docuemented in Antony C. Sutton’s book "The Best Enemy Money Can Buy." In the 1980’s, leading right up to Gulf War 1, the U.S. sold $4 billion worth of biological and chemical WMD to Saddam. Creating enemies is just good business and a fundamental Elite tactic.

Political analysis that focuses only on what this or that nation did, or is doing, or this or that leader, or political party, or politician, and so on, arise either from unawareness of the contrived structure of politics, including international politics, or from disinformation intended to transfer public attention from underlying control/manipulations to what I call the ‘daily drama,’ or simply, Drama.

Daily Drama is akin to ordinary theater, wherein the playwrite, producer and director (the Elite) are invisible to the audience (the public), who are engrossed in the action (performed by Elite operatives) with willing suspension of disbelief. It’s also akin to a symptom, or symptom picture (symptomology) in health. The symptoms of ignored underlying imbalances are sold as specific ‘diseases’ (a contrived situation that potentiates profit, not wellness). The chaos that often characterizes Drama is pure nourishment to the Elite. They thrive on it, as they do on the profits from illness produced by subjugating people with phony medical dogma backed up by phony science.

All major news outlets and even most ‘alternative’ news and activist groups, fall into one or the other category: ignorance of, or complicity in, the game. Some orgs reveal some truth in order to put on a good face, but remain mired in drama to keep key information under wraps. This is called "Limited Hang-Out." It’s not always easy to identify one category from another. The groups MoveOn and True Majority strike me as LHO. TruthOut is highly questionable as well, as it refuses to deal with deeper matters (I call it Half-TruthOut). One method of assessment is to look at how the orgs address Drama. Do they buy into it, or is it presented as symptom? Do they discuss Elite influence and control? Do they discuss/expose mind control and trauma-based mind control? And the NGO organizations (like the Royal Institute, Council on Foreign Relations, Club of Rome, etc) and secret societies, such as the Elite-created Zionist network, from whose ranks operatives are placed in key positions?

It’s important to keep in mind that even Drama analysis, LHO, and disinformation can be useful. "Good" disinformation contains a lot of truth—that’s the hook. If it were mostly or entirely bogus, it would soon lose credibility. It takes a while to catch on and be able to make use of it without being misled. Often, the Elite don’t wait for resistance to arise; they create it in order to do damage control.

One of the major Dramas presented for our enjoyment in America is the grand illusion of a two-party political system. Someone said, "We don’t need a third party, we need a second one." The proof of this is that the constant processes of war, spending for war, poverty, illness, environmental destruction, crumbs for a minimum wage, ongoing poisoning of the population by the chemical industry and military, and the enormous theft of The People’s wealth have continued no matter which party is in power. And neither party has ever challenged the main tentacle/organ of Elite control in the US–the Federal Reserve Bank.

Nor does either party question the phony currency system, the self-destructive capitalist system, the insanity of debt/inflation/growth (or Keynesian economics), the dependence of the economy on international illegal-drug dealing and money laundering, or the killing force that is conventional medicine.

The Elite don’t have a visibly  discreet structure like a corporation, but there is definitely a power hierarchy. There are also competing Elite factions. Elite power tends to be concentrated in, and mediated by, the world’s central banks (creators of the Third World–for exploitation). But for the most part, the real power remains out of sight, while Elite servants manage and execute the Agenda. This is why, even though the BushCo criminal dynasty are major players, they are not the fundamental problem.

The ones we see in positions of political power are usually ‘lower’ operatives, even though sometimes very powerful (Henry Kissinger). In most cases, operatives are ‘following orders’ or playing within guidelines. An important aspect, however, is that there may be a good amount of latitude allowed to operatives with regard to the methods chosen to execute the Agenda. In other words, the great ship of state tacks this way and that, but the port of call remains the same. This phenomenon is demonstrated by the fact that no matter which party is in power, or who the leaders are, wars continue apace, as do the corporate manipulations that victimize, oppress, and kill people, and that despoil the environment.

Elite Agenda

Centralized global control of human societies via a world ‘government’ central banking/corporate structure and currency, centralized army/police, and an informationally transparent microchipped population. In other words, George Orwell’s1984 on steroids.

Elite Basic Guiding Principles

Rule ONE: Never give away the game. Despite intense rivalries among individuals and factions (a situation that bodes ill for the common folk who are the pawns who usually suffer the ramifications of power struggles) absolute secrecy is maintained about the Elite agenda and M-O. In this way, people can be portrayed as noble or accomplished or benign who are supremely evil. Henry Kissinger again comes to mind.

Rule Two: If you’re going to be bad or evil, be so absolutely outrageous that people just can’t believe that anyone could be so. Hiding behind that which is too ‘far out’ to be believable is a major defense mechanism. The corollary to this is, or as it is also called, is The Big Lie: If you’re going to lie, lie so big that no one can imagine lying on such a scale.

Here’s a quote to consider:
"In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes." – Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Who can believe, for example, that 9/11 was planned and facilitated by "Americans" to gain political advantage? What a whacky, outrageous suggestion! But human life means nothing to the Elite. This unbelievable characteristic not only guides behavior, but serves to deflect their exposure. In fact, they thrive on chaos, blood and violence.

Rule Three: Absolute and utter ruthlessness is required. To make things happen and maintain control, no moral value whatsoever can stand in the way. See one example of such ruthlessness.

Rule Four: Loyalty to the group and the agenda supercedes loyalty to any nation, religion, group or person. National citizenships are for show and practical purposes only. These are internationalist corporatists who see governments as tools, nothing more—in fact, annoyances, since corporate rule is much preferred to political. This is what we’ve got already, appearances to the contrary notwithstanding. Political structures are primarily for show, which at some point may simply be dispensed with.

Elite Modus Operandi (MO)

Tactics are central to Elite control of human societies. They are usually employed to create the opposite impression of the truth. Thus, George W. Bush said in reference to 9/11, "Let us not entertain any wild conspiracy theories" (yet, the official fairy tale IS a conspiracy theory!) Elite propaganda is so effective that people cling for dear life to induced ideas and habits of thought and behavior that are misleading, unhelpful, and self-defeating. The process has been to create dependency on this enslaving and self-destructive situation. Eternal economic growth is a great example of self-destructive policy/behavior.

The fundamental tactic has always been to divide and conquer, and to rule by keeping people in ignorance, fear, and anxiety—and at war with each other. Elite operatives were on both sides of WW II, and Elite "Jews" financed Hitler, along with Elite "Christians," of course.

A main tactic in modern times has been to control/manipulate currency systems, markets, banking, economic events, and so on. This was consolidated with the advent of the international banking system, which came to life when William of Orange signed the charter for the first Bank of England in 1694. But it flowered in the late 18th century with the rise of the House of Rothschild (financers of the Third Reich, virtual owners of Israel, and the creators of the actually anti-Jewish Zionist network)–just in time to infest the newly emerging US of A. The Federal Reserve Bank is a major tentacle of the banking cartel, an unconstitutional entity that is not "federal" at all, but privately held. They run the show:

"I am afraid that the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can and do create money… And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people."
– Reginald McKenna speaking to stockholders as Chairman of the Board of Midland Bank in January 1924.

In his book The New Freedom, Woodrow Wilson, who was president when the Federal Reserve Act was secretly composed and pushed through Congress, said:

Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacturing are afraid of somebody, afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.

I have read elsewhere that Wilson also regretted signing the Act, saying he felt betrayed by its promoters. But what could that "power" be, other than the Elite, especially as manifest in the House of Rothschild cartel. But the story may be much deeper than that, and much more challenging to accept, as we consider on the Elite: Radical View page.

Another tactic mentioned earlier is the use of secret societies (such as Freemasons and the Order of Skull and Bones at Yale), foundations (Mellon Institute) and groups such as think tanks like American Enterprise Institute, and political appendages like the Council on Foreign Relations and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Often there are at least two levels of privilege among the membership in these groups: one that performs the ostensible purpose for which the organization exists—the front, in other words; and (2) an inner circle who is privy to, and carries on, the subversive behaviors to advance the Agenda. At higher levels, such as the Round Table (which includes the Bilderberg Group, Royal Institute, Club of Rome and others), privilege is more homogeneous, although there’s no doubt a heirarchy.

Disinformation and the infiltration of groups opposed to the Elite agenda are central to the game. By being on the inside of opposition, the Elite can do things to hamstring and/or discredit it. They will even create opposition in order to give the impression that good is being done. In some cases, organizations are created that have the opposite effect of the stated one. A good example is the World Wildlife Fund, an Elite front.

Environmentalism, crucial as it is to our survival, is infested with Elite influence. Laws can be used to give advantages to huge polluters, who have more financial resources to both meet demands and to fight in court when needed, or to pay fines. Whereas, smaller companies can be forced to disadvantage and even go out of business.

By the way, in case there’s any doubt the Elite are also known as the "Illuminati." Because this is how they see themselves—the Illumined Ones, or those specially bred and mentally equipped to lead the ‘sleeple’, whom they control in the West, America especially, by convincing them they’re free.

Three Primary Conspiracies Used to Advance the Agenda

1) Removal or ‘modification’ of people and organizations that threaten the Agenda

2) Putting people and organizations into positions of power that facilitate the Agenda (Kissinger, BushCo, Elliot Abrams, John Bolton, Tony Blair).

3) The Biggie: "Problem/Reaction/Solution" Creation of specific Dramas, events (wars, terrorist activities, diseases, economic collapses), that have shock value and that make the people ‘demand’ that the Agenda is introduced and advanced. The crisis is manipulated, the media facilitate the reaction ("something must be done"), and the Elite present the ‘solution.’ Patriot Act/Homeland Security/loss of civil liberties followed 9/11, just as they did after Hitler staged the Reichstag fire. Protection racket: After 9/11, W. Bush said in effect, "Go shopping; we’ll protect you."

Again, the game is essentially the old Mafia protection racket: they come into your ‘store’ and say, "We’ll protect you." You say, "From what?" They say, "Us!" Only in the case of threats such as terrorism or ‘rogue nations,’ the Elite connection and support is hidden to maintain the veneer. Beneath that respectability is, well, let’s put it this way—famous jazz/rock critic and champion of free speech, Ralph J. Gleason said, “No matter how paranoid you are, what they’re actually doing is worse than you can possibily imagine!”

Specific Policies
By controlling currency systems and sociopolitical institutions, the Elite can execute the sub-menus, or planks, of their Agenda. Some of the sub-menus are:
• promotion of war
• corruption of the agencies of government
• facilitating the development of mutual international enemies
• destruction of Earth’s environment
• promotion of illness
• promotion of crime
• promotion of social violence
• promotion of drug dependence and addiction (legal and illegal)
• distortion of religion and spirituality
• underlying influence behind Satanism and its cults
• genocide


Vatican Connection

The Vatican City And Rome: Esoteric Beyond Belief

The Vatican City State and Rome, together with London, Washington D.C. and Paris, are the most important capitals of the so called elite. I’ve had the opportunity to visit the Vatican and Rome this month, and I could not believe how openly displayed their control is. I took thousands of pictures and though I cannot share all of them with you, I will choose some of the most interesting and explain the esoteric significance of the symbolism. You will notice that a relatively small number of symbols are obsessively displayed in all their temples, churches and public squares.
These are the signatures of the "royal elite", as you will see.

Chapter One: The Vatican – St. Peter’s Square and Basilica

In my previous article, entitled "The Darkest Secrets Of The Vatican", I have explained the symbolism behind the "Holly See" (SS) and much more. If you haven’t read the article, I suggest you to do so, before proceeding. 
Throughout the Vatican and all of Rome’s churches, we will observe variations of the SS, which are signatures of the Roman Cult (the secret society controlling the Vatican and the Catholic Church) and its bloodline members. I will explain each symbolism at the appropriate moment.

St. Peter’s Square and Basilica — For many people synonymous with the Vatican City

The St. Peter’s Basilica is for many people synonymous with the Vatican. Looking more like a pagan temple than a a Catholic church (like all of Rome’s churches, in fact), this massive and opulent construction holds many dark secrets.
As I’ve mentioned in my previous article, the secret code of the Vatican was cracked by author and researcher Wayne Herschel. He was able to correlate the Vatican and Rome’s temples and obelisks to the stars, and reached the conclusion that they are a replica of the constellations Orion and Pleiades — the ancient stars of the "gods".
First of all, the Basilica together with Saint Peter’s Square, Via della Conciliazione and Castel Sant’Angelo, are designed to look like a key, if watched from above. The key represents the famous Solomon’s key from the "Key of Solomon" manuscripts.

Left: Statue of Solomon holding the keys — the keys are found everywhere in Vatican and Rome, including on the SS;
Left: The Vatican (highlighted) as seen today in Google Earth;
Right: Map of the Vatican in 1550 AD — notice the clear key-shape;
Credit: Wayne Herschel;

Also, Saint Peter’s Basilica and Square represent the Orion Constellation, while Castel Sant’Angelo represents the ancient star of the gods (known in Egypt as the Star of Ra).

Left: Saint Peter’s Square seen from above — notice the central Egyptian obelisk and the two fountains;
Middle: The three circles represent Orion’s Belt, the X represents the rest of the constellation, while the letter P (Peter) stand for the Pleiades — is the P’s elongated body (represented by the "Via della Conciliazione" street) that unites the constellations Orion and Pleiades;
Right: the "Christian" Chi-Rho symbol, representing the constellations of the gods, Orion and Pleiades.
Theory Credit: Wayne Herschel;

The obelisks of the Vatican City and Rome are mostly original Egyptian obelisks, just like the ones found in Paris, London and even New York. It is interesting to know why the heads of the Christians from all over the world are worshipers of a pagan monument.
The so called Illuminati (meaning "the enlightened ones", because they have access to the truth, while the rest of us don’t) are obsessively worshiping the obelisk because it represents the phallus of the Egyptian god Osiris — who was in fact Enki’s son, Asar. 
In symbolism, the obelisk represents the male energy and it is always accompanied by a nearby dome, which represents the female energy. As I will present to you, all the obelisks of the Vatican City and Rome are erected in front of huge domes.
Also, some of the domes look similar to the ancient beehives, which in symbolism represent the temples of the "royal" families. It is a symbol used extensively by the Freemasonry.
The Vatican City in pictures
The view from the top of Castel Sant’Angelo is breathtaking even on a cloudy day, and until I looked towards the Vatican, I almost forgot where I was (on top of a former prison of the Roman Inquisition and symbolic star of the ancient "gods").

View from the top of Castel Sant’Angelo towards Saint Peter’s Square and Basilica

The road leading from Castel Sant’Aneglo to Saint Peter’s Square and Basilica is known as Via della Conciliazione (meaning Road of the Conciliation — a decent name for a dark place) and it is flanked by 28 obelisks, 14 on each side.

Via della Conciliazione, flanked by 28 obelisks (14 on each side);
Also notice the pine cones on top of the two buildings flanking the street;

The male energy is represented by the original Egyptian obelisk in Saint Peter’s Square;
The female energy is represented by the dome of Saint Peter’s Basilica;
Also, the outside architecture of the dome resembles and ancient beehive;

On top of the phallic symbol we have a cross, a three dimensional eight-pointed star and a honeycomb. In the symbolism of the "elite", the Christian cross represents the crossing formed by the stars of the Orion constellation, the eight pointed stars represents either Melchizedek* or Inanna**, while the honeycomb represents the home of the "royal" families (while the bees represent the royal families). Wayne Herschel suggests that the symbol represents the seven hills of Rome, which in turn represent the Pleiades. Though I find his interpretation very plausible and interesting, I still consider the symbol to be a honeycomb (or maybe both), and you will see why later on.

*Excerpt from my previous article, "The Darkest Secrets Of The Vatican": The eight pointed star represents Melchizedek, who was the king of Salem and a priest of the "highest of all gods". Some theologians have supposed him to have been Shem, the son of Noah/Ziusudra, and grandfather of Nimrod (which later became the king of Shinar and priest of the fish god). In Masonry, Melchizedek is connected with the degree of High Priesthood (high mason rank).
**Inanna was the granddaughter of Enlil (Enki’s brother) and revered Anunnaki goddess. Her esoteric symbols are the eight-pointed star, the dove and the owl. She was known throughout history by many names: Ishtar, Semiramis, Venus and demon-goddess Lilith, to name few.
So, the human sacrifices brought to the owl goddess at the Bohemian Grove, are in fact dedicated to Inanna.

Right in front of the Basilica, there is a statue of, allegedly, Saint Peter holding two golden keys. In my opinion, the statue represents the infamous King Solomon — a formal King of Israel and a black magician who set the bases for the secret society known as …. The top members of this secret society have always been exquisite esoteric architects (hence their name), responsible with the construction of the temples of the "elite", according to various alignments (e.g. stars, cardinal points, true north, etc.) and sacred geometry.
It is a strong belief of mine that none of the characters painted or sculpted withing the temples of the "elite" actually represent those who we think they do. For example, all depictions of the Virgin Mary, probably represent Ninhursag. She was praised in Sumerian hymns as the "true and great lady of the heavens". According to the Sumerian tablets, Enki and Ninhursag were the ones to genetically engineer the very first human workers. Imagine the implications!

Allegedly St. Peter — In my opinion, none other than King Solomon, holding the keys that unlock the truth;
He points with the same hand at Castel Sant’Angelo — The star of the gods unlocks all mysteries;

Entering the Saint Peter’s Basilica, I’ve had mixed feelings. The beauty and grandness cannot be denied, but at the same time it is obscenely opulent. There is just too much wealth and grandeur for a church, while more than 30,000 children die of hunger each single day!

Ceremony inside the St. Peter’s Basilica:
The cardinals and pope wearing their "priests of the fish-god" robes and hats.
Notice the black altar with winding columns, place beneath the gigantic dome.
Image credit: Reuters

I have decided to begin my visit from the right side of the Basilica, and as soon as I’ve laid my eyes on the walls, the symbolism overwhelmed me. I’ve literally thought to myself "I need thousands of pictures and months of research to understand all this". So I have decided to take it easy and focus only on the symbolism that I was already familiar with.
The first big thing that caught my eye was a "wall of prayer", with a black square embedded in it. Above this wall there is a big cross and a painting of King Solomon (allegedly St. Peter) holding the key that unlocks the truth.

The "wall of prayer" with black square embedded, for the believers to touch

According to David Icke, in symbolism, the square means control, and the meaning of two or more squares is: "we control everything". [1] David Icke, "The Biggest Secret", Volume Two.
The square tool of the builders is also highly revered by the Masonry. [2], [3]. In my opinion, a black square refers to the knowledge of controlling the dark and negative energies.
Each year, hundreds of thousands of believers gather at Mecca, in Saudi Arabia, for a ceremony that, in symbolism, can be translated as the worship of the black cube (a cube is made of six identical squares). Also, all Muslims across the planet, pray five times a day facing Mecca, in order to pay their respects to this black cube, known as Ka’ba (meaning "Sacred House").
I know that for the decent human beings, the Ka’ba is a positive symbol, but not to the Illuminati.

Hundreds of thousands of Muslims gathered at Mecca to worship the black square

Embedded in one of the cube’s walls, there is a black stone that was allegedly brought to Earth by an angel. Many scientists and scholars believe that the stone is nothing else than a piece of a meteorite.
Nearly three million Muslim pilgrims visit Mecca each year, encircling the Ka’ba seven times counter clock wise, and pointing at the mysterious black stone. In ancient times, they used to kiss or touch the black stone embedded in the Ka’ba’s wall, but due to the high number of pilgrims, today is almost impossible.
According to modern researchers, the Ka’ba is precisely aligned with the rising of the star Canopus, the cycles of the moon, and the summer and winter solstices. [4] Wikipedia; [5] Ancient Aliens;
Again, we have evidence of advanced knowledge of astronomy in ancient times. Who gave this knowledge to the humans?
Going back to the black square inside the St. Peter’s Basilica, notice how the common people touch this black square and pray.

Believers flock to touch the black square and pray;
Above them, there is a painting of King Solomon holding the key of truth;
The painting displays the eight-pointed star in all the four corners of the frame;

This wall is flanked by the carvings of two popes (priests of the "fish-god" Enki, as I have explained in my previous article) wearing the Anunnaki cross (later known as Templar cross; also used by Hitler to decorate his most valuable soldiers and engraved on the pope’s clothing). Beneath, we can see a white Dove (actually, the dove is being obsessively displayed throughout the basilica):

Interesting to notice are the little angels holding the picture of the pope. If you think about it, those angels are nothing else than naked little children.

As I’ve mentioned before, in the symbolism of the "elite", the dove represents the Anunnaki goddess Inanna. David Icke labeled this kind of practice "reverse symbolism".
The following sculpture is simply amazing! It represents Pope Gregory XIII, the pope responsible for changing the harmonious Lunar calendar, with the solar calendar that we have today — "which remains the internationally accepted civil calendar to this date". [6] This is the reason why our calendar is known today as a Gregorian calendar, though historically speaking should be known as Marduk’s calendar.
(Marduk was the firstborn son on Enki, hence of royal Anunnaki blood. He was worshiped in Egypt as Ra, the sun god. He is the one who changed Egypt’s lunar calendar with a disharmonious solar calendar. After long and bloody wars, Marduk eventually became the supreme leader of Earth, dethroning his father Enki. 
Marduk is the central figure of Satanism and he was known by many names throughout history, including Lucifer, Satan, the Devil, and the Beast). [7]
Personally, I have absolutely no doubt that pope Gregory XIII knew exactly what he was doing when he changed the harmonious lunar calendar with the solar calendar of the one that he worshiped/served. The following sculpture strongly reinforces my statement.

Pope Gregorio (Gregory) XIII, wearing a variation of the papal mitre,
the one representing the pineal gland (symbol of supreme knowledge)
and/or the beehive (symbol of the "royal" families).

In this sculpture, Pope Gregory XIII sits on his throne, while the person on his left lifts the veil beneath Gregory’s throne and uncovers a… reptile. This reptilian entity is the dark power behind all of the world’s leaders and the source of their "royal" blood.

Reptilian figure hiding in the shadows;
In symbolism: the throne of power rests on the shoulders of the reptiles;
The winged reptilians are superior to the rest of the reptilian species, representing a royal branch;

The symbolism of the honeycomb, the house of the "royal" families, is present on most ceilings of the temples of the "elite". It is a hard statement, meaning "this was built by us and belongs to us".

Honeycomb architecture of the ceiling, representing the house of the bees (royal families)

(The beehive represents the exterior of the royal temples; the honeycomb is always depicted inside the beehive, hence representing the interior; the bees symbolize the "royal" families).
Another symbol found very often in correlation to the "royal" ones, is the lion. Just as the Egyptian sphinx, the lion represents the sun. All of the "royal" ones from Marduk’s genealogy are sun worshipers.

Shield with lion motif (worship of the sun), Solomon’s key and beehive/pineal gland

The Vatican’s SS (Holy See) is omnipresent throughout the Vatican City and Rome, so I have decided to post only the most interesting variations of it. Two other omnipresent symbols are the eight-pointed star and the fleur-de-lis (French for Lily flower).
The fleur-de-lis symbol evolved from the ancient symbol of the bee and represents the same thing: the "royal" families. It was and still is used extensively by the blue bloods. Notice in the upper left corner a stylized sculpture of the fleur-de-lis (above picture).
Inside this smaller temple, we find the honeycomb ceiling, the Masonic laurels and the eight-pointed star of Melchizedek (high priest Masonic rank) or Inanna (Sumerian Anunnaki goddess):

From an infinite variety of symbols they could have used, the same small group of symbols is used to decorate all the temples of the "elite"

Saint Peter’s Basilica pièce de résistance is the black altar, which in my opinion is extremely negative — a satanic symbol.

The black altar itself, with its snake-like winding columns, is littered with depictions of: suns, beehives and bees, laurels, squares, pine cones and naked children (sexually abused and sacrificed in Satanic rituals);
Notice the dove (Inanna) on the altar’s ceiling, radiating energy in the shape of the Anunnaki cross;

The ceiling of the basilica’s dome has a central godly figure residing inside a radiating sun, being surrounded by 32 more eight-pointed stars;
The total of 33 suns/stars, stand for the 33 ranks of Masonry;

Beneath the basilica’s dome, underneath the black altar, there is one more level available to the public, and at least one more level to which no outsider has access to. On the first underground level there are massive marble sarcophagi of deceased popes, continuing the tradition of entombing the high ranking secret society members beneath huge domes.
During the "religious" rituals, the pope has access to this underground level through a double stairway, leading exactly beneath the black altar. Extremely strange for a Christian religion (the Catholics are Christian) is the inverted cross symbolism, which is Satanic. It is also known as the cross of St. Peter and this, in my opinion, is one of the reasons why he was chosen as the alleged patron of the church.

Entrance to the first level of the catacombs: notice the eight-pointed stars depicted on the floor, all around the altar, and the reversed (up-side down) crosses on the doors to the catacombs;

Another reason is that his name starts with the letter P, from Pleiades. The St. Peter’s Basilica resides above the X formed by Orion Constellation, as I have presented in the opening in this article. The interlocked X and P are a cipher, a KEY, for unlocking the truth. 
The final reason is that Peter allegedly received the key of the Heavens from a godly figure: Jesus Christ.
Before showing you the pictures from inside the first level of catacombs, I want to show you one more picture, of the basilica’s apse:

Let us start from the bottom of this black altar, where we have four variations of the SS. Above we can clearly see the papal hat representing the hive/pineal gland and the keys of truth — nothing new here. But the rest of the emblem consists of two esoteric symbols carved on a shield. 
The first symbol is a tree, and it represents the tree of knowledge and life. It is the same tree found in all major cultures, representing the creation of life through genetic manipulation (Sumerian depiction of manipulating DNA;Babylonian depiction of Anunnaki manipulating the DNA tree — notice the fish-gods, the flying godly figure, and the eight-pointed star; small artifact found near the 12,000 years old temple of Gobekli Tepe, depicting the serpent and the tree of knowledge/DNA).
The second symbol is a beehive/honeycomb with an eight-pointed star above it.
Standing on this altar, there are four popes (plus two in the corners), above them there are two women that could represent Ninhursag and Inanna, and two little naked children holding the keys of knowledge and the papal hat representing the beehive and the pineal gland.
Above the entire scene there is a dove (Inanna) standing inside a bright sun, while on the right and left walls there are two Holly See’s with shields. On the shield of the right side there are tree bees, while on the shield of the left side there are six fleur-de-lis’.
The Catacombs
Descending into the catacombs through a second staircase, the first painting that you will notice is of two naked children (this time they have no wings, hence they are not alleged angels), holding the shield of the "royal elite":

The bees representing the "royal elite"

There are also paintings of popes being anointed, with armed escorts and crowds of people watching the parade. The paintings are flanked by numerous bees, attesting their "royal" blood.
A very interesting sight is a white marble desk and chair, with carved motifs. We can clearly see sheep on the face of the desk, worshiping a pope or heavenly figure. Notice on the left side, one of the sheep seems to be reaching a… human hand, towards the central figure. Yes, we are considered "sheeple" by the "elite", because we blindly obey them and follow their lead, just like a flock of sheep.

Carved on the back of the chair, there is a dove with an eight-pointed star above its head:

Sarcophagi of deceased popes are everywhere inside the catacombs, as expected. I will draw your attention towards the Chi-Rho, "Christian" sign (Orion and Pleiades) found on all of them, and the Anunnaki crosses found on some.

The symbolism of the upside down "peace" dove, just like the upside down cross, is extremely negative and used extensively by Satanists. [8]

Painting of Virgin Merry — definitely representing someone else for the "elite";
Notice the upper carving of an upside-down dove (symbolizing the opposite of peace);
Notice the shields with painted squares ("we control everything");
Notice the left carving: it is a modernized version of the ancient Babylonian carving of priests of the fish-god (exactly what the popes are) manipulating the tree of life;

Another interesting connection between the modern popes and the ancient "royalty" of Egypt, are the papal staffs (seen in the above and below pictures). They were known as heka in ancient Egypt and used only by the "royal" ones. [9]

Far wall: Pope with heka staff – trademark of the Egyptian "royalty"; notice the fish/reptilian scales beneath;
The "Christian" Chi-Rho/Orion-Pleiades sculpted on the sarcophagus;
Notice the Masonic laurel painted on the archway and the chain with pine cones at both ends;
The chain’s supports have Anunnaki/Templar cross motif;

The paths leading out of the catacombs and the Sistine Chapel meet in a small courtyard, where a statue of Saint Gregorius Armeniae Illuminator (a.k.a. Gregory the Illuminator) resides.

Notice the Satanist, upside down, dove on the hat that represents the worship of the fish-god;
Mason laurels above his head and scaly (fish/reptilian) pedestal feet;

Gregory the Illuminator was of "royal" blood, both his parents being nobles. His father was a famous prince, Anak the Parthian, who was a member of the Arsacid Dynasty of Armenia. Anak was charged with assassinating Khosrov II, one of the kings of the Arsacid dynasty and was put to death.
On the coming of his age, Gregory married a blue-blooded woman called Miriam, who was the daughter of an Armenian Prince in Cappadocia, hence passing "royal" blood to their offspring — just as expected.
Gregory the Illuminator was the first official head of the Armenian Apostolic Church. He converted Armenia to Christianity in 301. Armenia thus became the first nation to adopt Christianity as its official religion.  [10]
Gregory the Illuminator and both his sons, Vrtanes and Aristaces, are worshiped as saints (blue-bloods who served the agenda of the "royal elite" as clerics). "Saints" Aristaces and Vrtanes inherited in sequence their father’s position and further consolidated the strength and power of the Christian empire in the Caucasus Albaniaand Anatolia. [11]


The Illuminati Explained – How The Tentacles Of Global Conspiracy Of The Rothschild Family Has Been Established (while listening remember this information given back in the mid to late 1960’s!)

More On How the Rothschild Family Controlled The Modern World

[There is a blank (black out) from 10:00 – 20:00 please skip over it.]


The "Anointed" Rothschild! – Top Tier candidate for the Antichrist?!?
On July 19th, 2012 the Rothschild Cartel announced their "anointed" one!

Check this recent  Bloomberg news article out!  Alexandre de Rothschild, who turned 33 years old December 3, 2012, has been publicly anointed.  He has Jewish roots and it is said that he practices Judaism (qualifications necessary for
Israel to accept a person as their Messiah).  His family, especially on his French side, has invested much to build and support modern Israel (see below).  This public news release about the Rothschild anointed heir is well outside the normal realm of the usual family secrecy and its timing is highly interesting.  This could be our first good look at the future "leader of the world".  But, we will not know for certain until the seven year peace covenant is signed.

The Rothschild French Connection to Israel and Zionism:

Jewish Identity and Positions on Zionism

Jewish solidarity in the family was not homogeneous. Some Rothschilds were supporters of Zionism, while other members of the family opposed the creation of the Jewish state. Lord Victor Rothschild was against granting asylum or even help to Jewish refugees during the Holocaust.[23] In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration to the Zionist Federation,[30] which committed the British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.

After the death of James Jacob de Rothschild in 1868, Alphonse Rothschild, his oldest son, who took over the management of the family bank, was the most active in support for Eretz Israel.[31] The Rothschild family archives show that during the 1870s the family contributed nearly 500,000 francs per year on behalf of Eastern Jewry to the Alliance Israélite Universelle.[32] Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, James Jacob de Rothschild’s youngest son was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine at Rishon-LeZion, and bought from Ottoman landlords parts of the land which now makes up present-day Israel. In 1924, he established the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PICA), which acquired more than 125,000 acres (22,36 km²) of land and set up business ventures.[33] In Tel Aviv, he has a road, Rothschild Boulevard, named after him as well as various localities throughout Israel which he assisted in founding including Metulla, Zikhron Ya’akov, Rishon Lezion, and Rosh Pina. A park in Boulogne-Billancourt, Paris, the Parc Edmond de Rothschild (Edmond de Rothschild Park) is also named after its founder.[34] The Rothschilds also played a significant part in the funding of Israel’s governmental infrastructure. James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the State of Israel[35] and theSupreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy de Rothschild.[36] Outside the President’s Chamber is displayed the letter Mrs. Rothschild wrote to the then current Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.[37] (wikipedia)

After Nathan Rothschild’s death (1836)— it was said that his wealth was in fact intended for a higher purpose: "to avenge the wrongs of Israel" by securing "the re-establishment of Judah’s kingdom—then rebuilding of thy towers, Oh! Jerusalem!" and "the restoration of Judea to our ancient race."

The House of Rothschild: Volume 1: Money’s Prophets: 1798-1848 (1999)
Niall Ferguson, Page 21/22.
This is significant to the Jews, because their Messiah must come from the linage of Judah! (Genesis 49:10)

The Rothschild Banking Cartel

This International Banking Cartel has the Rothschilds at the very top and it includes the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome; the Lazards of Paris; the Rockefellers, the Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Goldman Sachs and the Lehmans.

This article has been offered to give some insight to just how connected, deep and pervasive the Cartel’s tentacles are wrapped around the physical elements that wield power and control in our world, both up front and behind the scenes (at least in part).

What this information does is to help free the mind from all the confusion and mystery concerning the false paradigms of power that the Rothschild Cartel uses to deceive, manipulate and control the masses (i.e. left versus right politics).

When we follow the money trail up through the pyramid of world power, past the corporations, past the corrupt politicians, past the front groups and past the mainstream media propagandist – we always find it leads to the Rothschild Banking Cartel, which is sitting quietly at the top, well behind the scenes.

Very soon they will be establishing their long planned New World Order of ten rulers.  Then, a special selected individual from among the Rothschild Cartel will finally emerge as the eleventh ruler.  He will come in a time of global financial and military crisis, which the Cartel has arranged through all their subsidiaries.  He will be the “bringer of peace” and the “savior”, as all the puppet strings will be pulled on to make the leaders of the world dance to his lead.  Some will try to stop him, but they will not succeed, for he is destined to rule the world (for his appointed time anyway).

Nevertheless, few understand the full extent of the Cartel’s goal’s, as most believe it is merely to take control of the world and develop a slave working class to serve the elites and their system, while they just get rid of everyone else that they do not perceive to be useful to them.  Unfortunately for humanity it is even darker than this – allow me to explain.

Even the Illuminati acknowledge that Lucifer (Satan) is the one who “illuminates” (inspires and directs) them.  Yet, they likely believe that once they help Satan and his demons take over the control of Planet Earth, that this will accomplish Lucifer’s final goal and all will be well.  However, depopulation and control, with worship to Lucifer from those who are allowed to remain living, is not the end game for this fallen one.

No, Satan’s ultimate goal is to utterly annihilate all of humanity, just like the demons did with the Mayan civilization, which literally sacrificed itself into extinction with massive human sacrifice, where in the end the few priests who were left sacrificed themselves for their masters (committing suicide).

It is unlikely at this point that the Illuminati understand the intended final outcome, as they are simply enthralled with pleasing their master, Satan, who gives them the immense power they have lusted after and longed for.  This is why it is valuable to correctly understand the true message of the prophets of God in the Bible.  It is the only way to full comprehend how all the pieces fit together concerning the coming New World Order.

P.S. Pictures of some of the Rothschild clan can be seen in the video "20 Lies …" at the end of this article.


The Federal Reserve Cartel (Part I): The Eight Families

by Dean Henderson
June 1, 2011

(Part one of a four-part series)

The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths.  But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.

According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.[1]

So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?

This information is guarded much more closely.  My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on “national security” grounds.  This is rather ironic, since many of the bank’s stockholders reside in Europe.

One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies isUS Trust Corporation – founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America. A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild.  Other directors included Daniel Davison of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley.[2]

J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US.  They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.

CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches.  He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, WarburgLehman BrothersLazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York. Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. [3]  The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb.  The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century. Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, of New York,

Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefellerand the others. [4]

The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in secrecy.  Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as “conspiracy theory”.  Yet the facts remain.

The House of Morgan

The Federal Reserve Bank was born in 1913, the same year US banking scion J. Pierpont Morgan died and the Rockefeller Foundation was formed.  The House of Morgan presided over American finance from the corner of Wall Street and Broad, acting as quasi-US central bank since 1838, when George Peabody founded it in London.

Peabody was a business associate of the Rothschilds.  In 1952 Fed researcher Eustace Mullins put forth the supposition that the Morgans were nothing more than Rothschild agents. Mullins wrote that the Rothschilds, “…preferred to operate anonymously in the US behind the facade of J.P. Morgan & Company”. [5]

Author Gabriel Kolko stated, “Morgan’s activities in 1895-1896 in selling US gold bonds in Europe were based on an alliance with the House of Rothschild.” [6]

The Morgan financial octopus wrapped its tentacles quickly around the globe.  Morgan Grenfell operated in London. Morgan et Ce ruled Paris. The Rothschild’s Lambert cousins set up Drexel & Company in Philadelphia.

The House of Morgan catered to the Astors, DuPonts, Guggenheims, Vanderbilts and Rockefellers.  It financed the launch of AT&T, General Motors, General Electric and DuPont.  Like the London-based Rothschild and Barings banks, Morgan became part of the power structure in many countries.

By 1890 the House of Morgan was lending to Egypt’s central bank, financing Russian railroads, floating Brazilian provincial government bonds and funding Argentine public works projects.  A recession in 1893 enhanced Morgan’s power.  That year Morgan saved the US government from a bank panic, forming a syndicate to prop up government reserves with a shipment of $62 million worth of Rothschild gold. [7]

Morgan was the driving force behind Western expansion in the US, financing and controlling West-bound railroads through voting trusts.  In 1879 Cornelius Vanderbilt’s Morgan-financed New York Central Railroad gave preferential shipping rates to John D. Rockefeller’s budding Standard Oil monopoly, cementing the Rockefeller/Morgan relationship.

The House of Morgan now fell under Rothschild and Rockefeller family control.  A New York Herald headline read, “Railroad Kings Form Gigantic Trust”.  J. Pierpont Morgan, who once stated, “Competition is a sin”, now opined gleefully, “Think of it.  All competing railroad traffic west of St. Louis placed in the control of about thirty men.”[8]

Morgan and Edward Harriman’s banker Kuhn Loeb held a monopoly over the railroads, while banking dynasties Lehman, Goldman Sachs and Lazard joined the Rockefellers in controlling the US industrial base. [9]

In 1903 Banker’s Trust was set up by the Eight Families.  Benjamin Strong of Banker’s Trust was the first Governor of the New York Federal Reserve Bank.  The 1913 creation of the Fed fused the power of the Eight Families to the military and diplomatic might of the US government.  If their overseas loans went unpaid, the oligarchs could now deploy US Marines to collect the debts.  Morgan, Chase and Citibank formed an international lending syndicate.

The House of Morgan was cozy with the British House of Windsor and the Italian House of Savoy.  The Kuhn Loebs, Warburgs, Lehmans, Lazards, Israel Moses Seifs and Goldman Sachs also had close ties to European royalty.  By 1895 Morgan controlled the flow of gold in and out of the US. The first American wave of mergers was in its infancy and was being promoted by the bankers.  In 1897 there were sixty-nine industrial mergers.  By 1899 there were twelve-hundred.  In 1904 John Moody – founder of Moody’s Investor Services – said it was impossible to talk of Rockefeller and Morgan interests as separate. [10]

Public distrust of the combine spread.  Many considered them traitors working for European old money.  Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Andrew Carnegie’s US Steel and Edward Harriman’s railroads were all financed by banker Jacob Schiff at Kuhn Loeb, who worked closely with the European Rothschilds.

Several Western states banned the bankers.  Populist preacher William Jennings Bryan was thrice the Democratic nominee for President from 1896 -1908.  The central theme of his anti-imperialist campaign was that America was falling into a trap of “financial servitude to British capital”. Teddy Roosevelt defeated Bryan in 1908, but was forced by this spreading populist wildfire to enact the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.  He then went after the Standard Oil Trust.

In 1912 the Pujo hearings were held, addressing concentration of power on Wall Street.  That same year Mrs. Edward Harriman sold her substantial shares in New York’s Guaranty Trust Bank to J.P. Morgan, creating Morgan Guaranty Trust.  Judge Louis Brandeis convinced President Woodrow Wilson to call for an end to interlocking board directorates.  In 1914 the Clayton Anti-Trust Act was passed.

Jack Morgan – J. Pierpont’s son and successor – responded by calling on Morgan clients Remington and Winchester to increase arms production.  He argued that the US needed to enter WWI.  Goaded by the Carnegie Foundation and other oligarchy fronts, Wilson accommodated.  As Charles Tansill wrote in America Goes to War, “Even before the clash of arms, the French firm of Rothschild Freres cabled to Morgan & Company in New York suggesting the flotation of a loan of $100 million, a substantial part of which was to be left in the US to pay for French purchases of American goods.”

The House of Morgan financed half the US war effort, while receiving commissions for lining up contractors like GE, Du Pont, US Steel, Kennecott and ASARCO.  All were Morgan clients.  Morgan also financed the British Boer War in South Africa and the Franco-Prussian War.  The 1919 Paris Peace Conference was presided over by Morgan, which led both German and Allied reconstruction efforts. [11]

In the 1930’s populism resurfaced in America after Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bank and others profited from the Crash of 1929. [12]  House Banking Committee Chairman Louis McFadden (D-NY) said of the Great Depression, “It was no accident.  It was a carefully contrived occurrence…The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers of us all”.

Sen. Gerald Nye (D-ND) chaired a munitions investigation in 1936.  Nye concluded that the House of Morgan had plunged the US into WWI to protect loans and create a booming arms industry.  Nye later produced a document titled The Next War, which cynically referred to “the old goddess of democracy trick”, through which Japan could be used to lure the US into WWII.

In 1937 Interior Secretary Harold Ickes warned of the influence of “America’s 60 Families”.  Historian Ferdinand Lundberg later penned a book of the exact same title.  Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas decried, “Morgan influence…the most pernicious one in industry and finance today.”

Jack Morgan responded by nudging the US towards WWII.  Morgan had close relations with the Iwasaki and Dan families – Japan’s two wealthiest clans – who have owned Mitsubishi and Mitsui, respectively, since the companies emerged from 17th Century shogunates.  When Japan invaded Manchuria, slaughtering Chinese peasants at Nanking, Morgan downplayed the incident.  Morgan also had close relations with Italian fascist Benito Mussolini, while German Nazi Dr. Hjalmer Schacht was a Morgan Bank liaison during WWII.  After the war Morgan representatives met with Schacht at the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland. [13]

The House of Rockefeller

BIS is the most powerful bank in the world, a global central bank for the Eight Families who control the private central banks of almost all Western and developing nations. The first President of BIS was Rockefeller banker Gates McGarrah- an official at Chase Manhattan and the Federal Reserve. McGarrah was the grandfather of former CIA director Richard Helms.  The Rockefellers – like the Morgans – had close ties toLondon and ran the American operation for the European Rothschilds.

BIS is owned by the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, Bank of Canada, Swiss National Bank,Nederlandsche Bank, Bundesbank and Bank of France.

Historian Carroll Quigley wrote in his epic book Tragedy and Hope that BIS was part of a plan, “to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole…to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements.”

The US government had a historical distrust of BIS, lobbying unsuccessfully for its demise at the 1944 post-WWII Bretton Woods Conference.  Instead the Eight Families’ power was exacerbated, with the Bretton Woods creation of the IMF and the World Bank.  The US Federal Reserve only took shares in BIS in September 1994. [14]

BIS holds at least 10% of monetary reserves for at least 80 of the world’s central banks, the IMF and other multilateral institutions.  It serves as financial agent for international agreements, collects information on the global economy and serves as lender of last resort to prevent global financial collapse.

BIS promotes an agenda of monopoly capitalist fascism.  It gave a bridge loan to Hungary in the 1990’s to ensure privatization of that country’s economy.  It served as conduit for Eight Families funding of Adolf Hitler- led by the Warburg’s J. Henry Schroeder and Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam. Many researchers assert that BIS is at the nadir of global drug money laundering. [15]

It is no coincidence that BIS is headquartered in Switzerland, favorite hiding place for the wealth of the global aristocracy and headquarters for the P-2 Italian Freemason’s Alpina Lodge and Nazi International. Other institutions which the Eight Families control include the World Economic Forum, the International Monetary Conference and the World Trade Organization.

Bretton Woods was a boon to the Eight Families.  The IMF and World Bank were central to this “new world order”.  In 1944 the first World Bank bonds were floated by Morgan Stanley and First Boston.  The French Lazard family became more involved in House of Morgan interests.  Lazard Freres- France’s biggest investment bank- is owned by the Lazard and David-Weill families- old Genoese banking scions represented by Michelle Davive.  A recent Chairman and CEO of Citigroup was Sanford Weill.

In 1968 Morgan Guaranty launched Euro-Clear, a Brussels-based bank clearing system for Eurodollar securities.  It was the first such automated endeavor.  Some took to calling Euro-Clear “The Beast”.  Brussels serves as headquarters for the new European Central Bank and for NATO.  In 1973 Morgan officials met secretly in Bermuda to illegally resurrect the old House of Morgan, twenty years before Glass Steagal Act was repealed.  Morgan and the Rockefellers provided the financial backing for Merrill Lynch, boosting it into the Big 5 of US investment banking.  Merrill is now part of Bank of America.

John D. Rockefeller used his oil wealth to acquire Equitable Trust, which had gobbled up several large banks and corporations by the 1920’s.  The Great Depression helped consolidate Rockefeller’s power.  His Chase Bank merged with Kuhn Loeb’s Manhattan Bank to form Chase Manhattan, cementing a long-time family relationship.  The Kuhn-Loeb’s had financed – along with Rothschilds – Rockefeller’s quest to become king of the oil patch. National City Bank of Cleveland provided John D. with the money needed to embark upon his monopolization of the US oil industry.  The bank was identified in Congressional hearings as being one of three Rothschild-owned banks in the US during the 1870’s, when Rockefeller first incorporated as Standard Oil of Ohio. [16]

One Rockefeller Standard Oil partner was Edward Harkness, whose family came to control Chemical Bank.  Another was James Stillman, whose family controlled Manufacturers Hanover Trust.  Both banks have merged under the JP Morgan Chase umbrella.  Two of James Stillman’s daughters married two of William Rockefeller’s sons.  The two families control a big chunk of Citigroup as well. [17]

In the insurance business, the Rockefellers control Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life, Prudential and New York Life.  Rockefeller banks control 25% of all assets of the 50 largest US commercial banks and 30% of all assets of the 50 largest insurance companies.  Insurance companies- the first in the US was launched by Freemasons through their Woodman’s of America- play a key role in the Bermuda drug money shuffle.

Companies under Rockefeller control include Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran, Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United, Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing, Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer, Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods.

The Rockefeller Foundation has close financial ties to both Ford and Carnegie Foundations.  Other family philanthropic endeavors include Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, General Education Board, Rockefeller University and the University of Chicago- which churns out a steady stream of far right economists as apologists for international capital, including Milton Friedman.

The family owns 30 Rockefeller Plaza, where the national Christmas tree is lighted every year, and Rockefeller Center. David Rockefeller was instrumental in the construction of the World Trade Center towers.  The main Rockefeller family home is a hulking complex in upstate New York known as Pocantico Hills.  They also own a 32-room 5th Avenue duplex in Manhattan, a mansion in Washington, DC, Monte Sacro Ranch in Venezuela, coffee plantations in Ecuador, several farms in Brazil, an estate at Seal Harbor, Maine and resorts in the Caribbean, Hawaii and Puerto Rico.

The Dulles and Rockefeller families are cousins.  Allen Dulles created the CIA, assisted the Nazis, covered up the Kennedy hit from his Warren Commission perch and struck a deal with the Muslim Brotherhood to create mind-controlled assassins. [18]

Brother John Foster Dulles presided over the phony Goldman Sachs trusts before the 1929 stock market crash and helped his brother overthrow governments in Iran and Guatemala.  Both were Skull & Bones, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) insiders and 33rd Degree Masons. [19]

The Rockefellers were instrumental in forming the depopulation-oriented Club of Rome at their family estate in Bellagio, Italy. Their Pocantico Hills estate gave birth to the Trilateral Commission.  The family is a major funder of the eugenics movement which spawned Hitler, human cloning and the current DNA obsession in US scientific circles.

John Rockefeller Jr. headed the Population Council until his death. [20]  His namesake son is a Senator from West Virginia.  Brother Winthrop Rockefeller was Lieutenant Governor of Arkansas and remains the most powerful man in that state.  In an October 1975 interview with Playboy magazine, Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller- who was also Governor of New York- articulated his family’s patronizing worldview, “I am a great believer in planning- economic, social, political, military, total world planning.”

But of all the Rockefeller brothers, it is Trilateral Commission (TC) founder and Chase Manhattan Chairman David who has spearheaded the family’s fascist agenda on a global scale.  He defended the Shah of Iran, the South African apartheid regime and the Chilean Pinochet junta.  He was the biggest financier of the CFR, the TC and (during the Vietnam War) the Committee for an Effective and Durable Peace in Asia- a contract bonanza for those who made their living off the conflict.

Nixon asked him to be Secretary of Treasury, but Rockefeller declined the job, knowing his power was much greater at the helm of the Chase.  Author Gary Allen writes in The Rockefeller File that in 1973, “David Rockefeller met with twenty-seven heads of state, including the rulers of Russia and Red China.”

Following the 1975 Nugan Hand Bank/CIA coup against Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, his British Crown-appointed successor Malcolm Fraser sped to the US, where he met with President Gerald Ford afterconferring with David Rockefeller. [21]

[1] 10K Filings of Fortune 500 Corporations to SEC. 3-91

[2] 10K Filing of US Trust Corporation to SEC. 6-28-95

[3] “The Federal Reserve ‘Fed Up’. Thomas Schauf.

[4] The Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Eustace Mullins. Bankers Research Institute. Staunton, VA. 1983. p.179

[5] Ibid. p.53

[6] The Triumph of Conservatism. Gabriel Kolko. MacMillan and Company New York. 1963. p.142

[7] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.57

[8] The House of Morgan. Ron Chernow. Atlantic Monthly Press NewYork 1990

[9] Marrs. p.57

[10] Democracy for the Few. Michael Parenti. St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1977. p.178

[11] Chernow

[12] The Great Crash of 1929. John Kenneth Galbraith. Houghton, Mifflin Company. Boston. 1979. p.148

[13] Chernow

[14] The Confidence Game: How Un-Elected Central Bankers are Governing the Changed World Economy. Steven Solomon. Simon & Schuster. New York. 1995. p.112

[15] Marrs. p.180

[16] Ibid. p.45

[17] The Rockefeller File. Gary Allen. ’76 Press. Seal Beach, CA. 1977

[18] Dope Inc.: The Book That Drove Kissinger Crazy. Editors of Executive Intelligence Review. Washington, DC. 1992

[19] Marrs.

[20] The Rockefeller Syndrome. Ferdinand Lundberg. Lyle Stuart Inc. Secaucus, NJ. 1975. p.296

[21] Marrs. p.53

The Federal Reserve Cartel: Part II: The Freemason BUS & The House Of Rothschild

June 8, 2011 — Dean Henderson

In 1789 Alexander Hamilton became the first Treasury Secretary of the United States.  Hamilton was one of many Founding Fathers who were Freemasons. He had close relations with the Rothschild family which owns the Bank of England and leads the European Freemason movement.

With Rothschild financing Alexander Hamilton founded two New York banks, including Bank of New York. [1]  He died in a gun battle with Aaron Burr, who founded Bank of Manhattan with Kuhn Loeb financing.  Hamilton exemplified the contempt which the Eight Families hold towards common people, once stating, “All communities divide themselves into the few and the many.  The first are the rich and the well born, the others the mass of the people…The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge and determine right.  Give therefore to the first class a distinct, permanent share of government.  They will check the unsteadiness of the second.”[2]

Hamilton was only the first in a series of Eight Families cronies to hold the key position of Treasury Secretary.  In recent times Kennedy Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon came from Dillon Read (now part of UBS Warburg). Nixon Treasury Secretaries David Kennedy and William Simon came from Continental Illinois Bank (now part of Bank of America) and Salomon Brothers (now part of Citigroup), respectively. Carter Treasury Secretary Michael Blumenthal came from Goldman Sachs, Reagan Treasury Secretary Donald Regan came from Merrill Lynch (now part of Bank of America), Bush Sr. Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady came from Dillon Read (UBS Warburg) and both Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and Bush Jr. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson came from Goldman Sachs. Obama Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner worked at Kissinger Associates and the New York Fed.

Thomas Jefferson argued that the United States needed a publicly-owned central bank so that European monarchs and aristocrats could not use the printing of money to control the affairs of the new nation. Jefferson extolled, “A country which expects to remain ignorant and free…expects that which has never been and that which will never be.  There is scarcely a King in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh – get first all the people’s money, then all their lands and then make them and their children servants forever…banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. Already they have raised up a money aristocracy.” Jefferson watched as the Euro-banking conspiracy to control the United States unfolded, weighing in, “Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”. [3]

But the Rothschild-sponsored Hamilton’s arguments for a private US central bank carried the day.  In 1791 the Bank of the United States (BUS) was founded, with the Rothschilds as main owners.  The bank’s charter was to run out in 1811.  Public opinion ran in favor of revoking the charter and replacing it with a Jeffersonian public central bank.  The debate was postponed as the nation was plunged by the Euro-bankers into the War of 1812.  Amidst a climate of fear and economic hardship, Hamilton’s bank got its charter renewed in 1816.

Old Hickory, Honest Abe & Camelot

In 1828 Andrew Jackson took a run at the US Presidency.  Throughout his campaign he railed against the international bankers who controlled the BUS.  Jackson ranted, “You are a den of vipers.  I intend to expose you and by Eternal God I will rout you out.  If the people understood the rank injustices of our money and banking system there would be a revolution before morning.”

Jackson won the election and revoked the bank’s charter stating, “The Act seems to be predicated on an erroneous idea that the present shareholders have a prescriptive right to not only the favor, but the bounty of the government…for their benefit does this Act exclude the whole American people from competition in the purchase of this monopoly.  Present stockholders and those inheriting their rights as successors be established a privileged order, clothed both with great political power and enjoying immense pecuniary advantages from their connection with government.  Should its influence be concentrated under the operation of such an Act as this, in the hands of a self-elected directory whose interests are identified with those of the foreign stockholders, will there not be cause to tremble for the independence of our country in war…controlling our currency, receiving our public monies and holding thousands of our citizens independence, it would be more formidable and dangerous than the naval and military power of the enemy.  It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government for selfish purposes…to make the rich richer and more powerful.  Many of our rich men have not been content with equal protection and equal benefits, but have besought us to make them richer by acts of Congress.  I have done my duty to this country.”[4]

Populism prevailed and Jackson was re-elected. In 1835 he was the target of an assassination attempt. The gunman was Richard Lawrence, who confessed that he was, “in touch with the powers in Europe”. [5]

Still, in 1836 Jackson refused to renew the BUS charter.  Under his watch the US national debt went to zero for the first and last time in our nation’s history. This angered the international bankers, whose primary income is derived from interest payments on debt.  BUS President Nicholas Biddle cut off funding to the US government in 1842, plunging the US into a depression.  Biddle was an agent for the Paris-based Jacob Rothschild. [6]

The Mexican War was simultaneously sprung on Jackson. A few years later the Civil War was unleashed, with London bankers backing the Union and French bankers backing the South. The Lehman family made a fortune smuggling arms to the south and cotton to the north.  By 1861 the US was $100 million in debt.  New President Abraham Lincoln snubbed the Euro-bankers again, issuing Lincoln Greenbacks to pay Union Army bills.

The Rothschild-controlled Times of London wrote, “If that mischievous policy, which had its origins in theNorth American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” [7]

The Euro-banker-written Hazard Circular was exposed and circulated throughout the country by angry populists.  It stated, “The great debt that capitalists will see is made out of the war and must be used to control the valve of money.  To accomplish this government bonds must be used as a banking basis.  We are now awaiting Secretary of Treasury Salmon Chase to make that recommendation.  It will not allow Greenbacks to circulate as money as we cannot control that.  We control bonds and through them banking issues”.

The 1863 National Banking Act reinstated a private US central bank and Chase’s war bonds were issued. Lincoln was re-elected the next year, vowing to repeal the act after he took his January 1865 oaths of office. Before he could act, he was assassinated at the Ford Theatre by John Wilkes Booth.  Booth had major connections to the international bankers.  His granddaughter wrote This One Mad Act, which details Booth’s contact with “mysterious Europeans” just before the Lincoln assassination.

Following the Lincoln hit, Booth was whisked away by members of a secret society known as Knights of the Golden Circle (KGC).  KGC had close ties to the French Society of Seasons, which produced Karl Marx.  KGC had fomented much of the tension that caused the Civil War and President Lincoln had specifically targeted the group. Booth was a KGC member and was connected through Confederate Secretary of State Judah Benjamin to the House of Rothschild.  Benjamin fled to England after the Civil War. [9]

Nearly a century after Lincoln was assassinated for issuing Greenbacks, President John F. Kennedy found himself in the Eight Families’ crosshairs.  Kennedy had announced a crackdown on off-shore tax havens and proposed increases in tax rates on large oil and mining companies.  He supported eliminating tax loopholes which benefit the super-rich.  His economic policies were publicly attacked by Fortune magazine, the Wall Street Journal and both David and Nelson Rockefeller.  Even Kennedy’s own Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon, who came from the UBS Warburg-controlled Dillon Read investment bank, voiced opposition to the JFK proposals. [9]

Kennedy’s fate was sealed in June 1963 when he authorized the issuance of more than $4 billion in United States Notes by his Treasury Department in an attempt to circumvent the high interest rate usury of the private Federal Reserve international banker crowd.  The wife of Lee Harvey Oswald, who was conveniently gunned down by Jack Ruby before Ruby himself was shot, told author A. J. Weberman in 1994, “The answer to the Kennedy assassination is with the Federal Reserve Bank.  Don’t underestimate that.  It’s wrong to blame it on Angleton and the CIA per se only.  This is only one finger on the same hand.  The people who supply the money are above the CIA”. [10]

Fueled by incoming President Lyndon Johnson’s immediate escalation of the Vietnam War, the US sank further into debt. Its citizens were terrorized into silence. If they could kill the President they could kill anyone (and many were killed in the JFK assassination cover-up).

The House of Rothschild

The Dutch House of Orange founded the Bank of Amsterdam in 1609 as the world’s first central bank.  Prince William of Orange married into the English House of Windsor, taking King James II’s daughter Mary as his bride.  The Orange Order Brotherhood, which recently fomented Northern Ireland Protestant violence, put William III on the English throne where he ruled both Holland and Britain. In 1694 William III teamed up with the UK aristocracy to launch the private Bank of England.

The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street- as the Bank of England is known- is surrounded by thirty foot walls. Three floors beneath it the third largest stock of gold bullion in the world is stored. [11]

The Rothschilds and their inbred Eight Families partners gradually came to control the Bank of England. The daily London gold “fixing” occurred at the N. M. Rothschild Bank until 2004.  As Bank of England Deputy Governor George Blunden put it, “Fear is what makes the bank’s powers so acceptable.  The bank is able to exert its influence when people are dependent on us and fear losing their privileges or when they are frightened.”[12]

Mayer Amschel Rothschild sold the British government German Hessian mercenaries to fight against American Revolutionaries, diverting the proceeds to his brother Nathan in London, where N.M. (Nathan and Mayer) Rothschild & Sons was established.  Mayer was a serious student of Cabala and launched his fortune on money embezzled from William IX- royal administrator of the Hesse-Kassel region and a prominent Freemason.

Rothschild-controlled Barings bankrolled the Chinese opium and African slave trades. It financed theLouisiana Purchase.  When several states defaulted on its loans, Barings bribed Daniel Webster to make speeches stressing the virtues of loan repayment.  The states held their ground, so the House of Rothschild cut off the money spigot in 1842, plunging the US into a deep depression.  It was often said that the wealth of the Rothschilds depended on the bankruptcy of nations.  Mayer Amschel Rothschild once said, “I care not who controls a nation’s political affairs, so long as I control her currency”.

War didn’t hurt the family fortune either.  The House of Rothschild financed the Prussian War, the Crimean War and the British attempt to seize the Suez Canal from the French.  Nathan Rothschild made a huge financial bet on Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo, while also funding the Duke of Wellington’s peninsular campaign against Napoleon. Both the Mexican War and the Civil War were goldmines for the family.

One Rothschild family biography mentions a London meeting where an “International Banking Syndicate” decided to pit the American North against the South as part of a “divide and conquer” strategy. German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck once stated, “The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War.  These bankers were afraid that the United States…would upset their financial domination over the world.  The voice of the Rothschilds prevailed.” Rothschild biographer Derek Wilson says the family was the official European banker to the US government and strong supporters of the Bank of the United States. [13]

Family biographer Niall Ferguson notes a “substantial and unexplained gap” in private Rothschild correspondence between 1854-1860. He says all copies of outgoing letters written by the London Rothschilds during this Civil War period “were destroyed at the orders of successive partners”. [14]

French and British troops had, at the height of the Civil War, encircled the US.  The British sent 11,000 troops to Crown-controlled Canada, which gave safe harbor to Confederate agents.  France’s Napoleon III installed Austrian Hapsburg family member Archduke Maximilian as his puppet emperor in Mexico, where French troops massed on the Texas border.  Only an 11th-hour deployment of two Russian warship fleets byUS ally Czar Alexander II in 1863 saved the United States from re-colonization. [15]

That same year the Chicago Tribune blasted, “Belmont (August Belmont was a US Rothschild agent and had a Triple Crown horse race named in his honor) and the Rothschilds…who have been buying up Confederate war bonds.”

Salmon Rothschild said of a deceased President Lincoln, “He rejects all forms of compromise. He has the appearance of a peasant and can only tell barroom stories.” Baron Jacob Rothschild was equally flattering towards the US citizenry. He once commented to US Minister to Belgium Henry Sanford on the over half a million Americans who died during the Civil War, “When your patient is desperately sick, you try desperate measures, even to bloodletting.” Salmon and Jacob were merely carrying forth a family tradition.  A few generations earlier Mayer Amschel Rothschild bragged of his investment strategy, “When the streets of Parisare running in blood, I buy”. [16]

Mayer Rothschild’s sons were known as the Frankfurt Five.  The eldest – Amschel – ran the family’sFrankfurt bank with his father, while Nathan ran London operations. Youngest son Jacob set up shop inParis, while Salomon ran the Vienna branch and Karl was off to Naples. Author Frederick Morton estimates that by 1850 the Rothschilds were worth over $10 billion. [17] Some researchers believe that their fortune today exceeds $100 trillion.

The Warburgs, Kuhn Loebs, Goldman Sachs, Schiffs and Rothschilds have intermarried into one big happy banking family.  The Warburg family- which controls Deutsche Bank and BNP tied up with the Rothschilds in 1814 in Hamburg, while Kuhn Loeb powerhouse Jacob Schiff shared quarters with Rothschilds in 1785.  Schiff immigrated to America in 1865. He joined forces with Abraham Kuhn and married Solomon Loeb’s daughter.  Loeb and Kuhn married each others sisters and the Kuhn Loeb dynasty was consummated.  Felix Warburg married Jacob Schiff’s daughter. Two Goldman daughters married two sons of the Sachs family, creating Goldman Sachs.  In 1806 Nathan Rothschild married the oldest daughter of Levi Barent Cohen, a leading financier in London. [18]  Thus, Merrill Lynch super-bull Abby Joseph Cohen and Clinton Secretary of Defense William Cohen are likely descended from Rothschilds.

Today the Rothschild’s control a far-flung financial empire, which includes majority stakes in most world central banks.  The Edmond de Rothschild clan owns the Banque Privee SA in Lugano, Switzerland and the Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich. The family of Jacob Lord Rothschild owns the powerful Rothschild Italia inMilan. They are founding members of the exclusive $10 trillion Club of the Isles – which controls corporate giants Royal Dutch Shell, Imperial Chemical Industries, Lloyds of London, Unilever, Barclays, Lonrho, RioTinto Zinc, BHP Billiton and Anglo American DeBeers. It dominates the world supply of petroleum, gold, diamonds, and many other vital raw materials. [19]

The Club of the Isles provides capital for George Soros’ Quantum Fund NV – which made a killing in 1998-99 destroying the currencies of Thailand, Indonesia and Russia. Soros was a major shareholder at George W. Bush’s Harken Energy. Quantum NV operates from the Dutch island of Curacao, in the shadow of recently shuttered Royal Dutch/Shell and Exxon Mobil refineries.  Curacao was recently cited by an OECD Task Force on Money Laundering as a major drug money laundering nation.  The Club of Isles is led by the Rothschilds and includes Queen Elizabeth II and other wealthy European aristocrats and Black Nobility.  Fugitive Swiss financier and Mossad cutout Marc Rich, whose business interests were recently taken over by the Russian mafia Alfa Group, is also part of the Soros network. [20]

Ties to drug money are nothing new to the Rothschilds.  N. M. Rothschild & Sons was at the epicenter of the Bank of Credit & Commerce International (BCCI) scandal, but escaped the limelight when a warehouse full of documents conveniently burned to the ground around the time Rothschild-controlled Bank of England shut BCCI down.

Recent Rothschild endeavors include the backing of Russian oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, control over Blackstone Group (see “…The 911 Short Selling Financial Scam”:, and the takeover of giant Swiss oil trader Glencore.

Perhaps the largest repository for Rothschild wealth today is Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG – a secretive Swiss-based bank holding company.  By the late 1990s scions of the Rothschild global empire wereBarons Guy and Elie de Rothschild in France and Lord Jacob and Sir Evelyn Rothschild in Britain. [21]

Evelyn was chairman of the Economist and a director at DeBeers and IBM UK.

Jacob backed Arnold Schwarzenegger’s California gubernatorial campaign. He took control of Khodorkovsky’s YUKOS oil shares just before the Russian government arrested him. In 2010 Jacob joinedRupert Murdoch in a shale oil extraction partnership in Israel through Genie Energy – a subsidiary of IDT Corporation. [22]

[1] The Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.156

[2] Democracy for the Few. Michael Parenti. St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1977. p.51

[3] Fourth Reich of the Rich. Des Griffin. Emissary Publications. Pasadena, CA. 1978. p.171

[4] Ibid. p.173

[5] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.68

[6] The Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Eustace Mullins. Bankers Research Institute. Staunton, VA. 1983. p.179

[7] Human Race Get Off Your Knees: The Lion Sleeps No More. David Icke. David Icke Books Ltd. Isle of Wight. UK. 2010. p.92

[8] Marrs. p.212

[9] Idid. p.139

[10] Ibid p.141

[11] Icke. The Robot’s Rebellion. p.114

[12] Ibid. p.181

[13] Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty. Derek Wilson. Charles Schribner’s Sons. New York. 1988. p.178

[14] The House of Rothschild. Niall Ferguson. Viking Press New York 1998 p.28

[15] Marrs. p.215

[16] Ibid

[17] “What You Didn’t Know about Taxes and the Crown”. Mark Owen. Paranoia. #41. Spring 2006. p.66

[18] Marrs. p.63

[19] “The Coming Fall of the House of Windsor”. The New Federalist. 1994

[20] “The Secret Financial Network Behind ‘Wizard’ George Soros”. William Engdahl. Executive Intelligence Review. 11-1-96

[21] Marrs. p.86

[22] “Murdoch, Rothschild Invest in Israeli Oil Shale”. Jerusalem Post. November 22, 2010

The Federal Reserve Cartel: Part III: The Roundtable & The Illuminati

June 14, 2011 — Dean Henderson

According to former British intelligence agent John Coleman’s book, The Committee of 300, the Rothschilds exert political control through the secretive Business Roundtable, which they created in 1909 with the help of Lord Alfred Milner and South African industrialist Cecil Rhodes. The Rhodes Scholarship is granted by Cambridge University, out of which oil industry propagandist Cambridge Energy Research Associates operates.

Rhodes founded De Beers and Standard Chartered Bank.  According to Gary Allen’s expose, The Rockefeller Files, Milner financed the Russian Bolsheviks on Rothschild’s behalf, with help from Jacob Schiff and Max Warburg.

In 1917 British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour penned a letter to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild in which he expressed support for a Jewish homeland on Palestinian-controlled lands in the Middle East. [1]

The Balfour Declaration justified Lord Rothschild’s purchase of the land for the post-WWII establishment of Israel. Israel was to serve as a Jewish homeland and a lynchpin in Rothschild/Eight Families control over the world’s oil supply.  Baron Edmond de Rothschild built the first oil pipeline from the Red Sea to theMediterranean to bring BP Iranian oil to Israel.  He founded Israeli General Bank and Paz Oil. He is considered by many the father of modern Israel. [2]

Roundtable inner Circle of Initiates included Lord Milner, Cecil Rhodes, Arthur Balfour, Albert Grey and Lord Nathan Rothschild.  John Coleman writes in The Committee of 300, “Round Tablers armed with immense wealth from gold, diamond and drug monopolies fanned out throughout the world to take control of fiscal and monetary policies and political leadership in all countries where they operated.”

While Cecil Rhodes and the Oppenheimers went to South Africa, the Kuhn Loebs were off to re-colonizeAmerica.  Rudyard Kipling was sent to India. The Schiffs and Warburgs manhandled Russia. The Rothschilds, Lazards and Israel Moses Seifs pushed into the Middle East.  In Princeton, New Jersey the Round Table founded the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) as partner to its All Souls College at Oxford. IAS was funded by the Rockefeller’s General Education Board. IAS members Robert Oppenheimer, Neils Bohr and Albert Einstein created the atomic bomb. [3]

In 1919 Rothschild’s Business Roundtable spawned the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) inLondon.  The RIIA soon sponsored sister organizations around the globe, including the US Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Asian Institute of Pacific Relations, the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, the Brussels-based Institute des Relations Internationales, the Danish Foreign Policy Society, the Indian Council of World Affairs and the Australian Institute of International Affairs. Other affiliates popped up in France,Turkey, Italy, Yugoslavia and Greece. [4]

The RIIA is a registered charity of the Queen and, according to its annual reports, is funded largely by the Four Horsemen.  Former British Foreign Secretary and Kissinger Associates co-founder Lord Carrington was President of both the RIIA and the Bilderbergers.  The inner circle at RIIA is dominated by Knights of St. John Jerusalem, Knights of Malta, Knights Templar and 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemasons.  The Knights of St. John were founded in 1070 and answer directly to the British House of Windsor.  Their leading bloodline is the Villiers dynasty, which the Hong Kong Matheson family married into. The Lytton family also married into the Villiers gang. [5]

Colonel Edward Bulwer-Lytton led the English Rosicrucian secret society, which Shakespeare opaquely referred to as Rosencranz, while the Freemasons took the role of Guildenstern.  Lytton was spiritual father of both the RIIA and Nazi fascism.  In 1871 he penned a novel titled, Vril: The Power of the Coming Race.  Seventy years later the Vril Society received ample mention in Adolf Hitler’s Mein KampfLytton’s son became Viceroy to India in 1876 just before opium production spiked in that country.  Lytton’s good friendRudyard Kipling worked under Lord Beaverbrook as Propaganda Minister, alongside Sir Charles Hambro of the Hambros banking dynasty. [6]

James Bruce, ancestor to Scottish Rite Freemason founder Sir Robert the Bruce, was the 8th Earl of Elgin. He supervised the Caribbean slave trade as Jamaican Governor General from 1842-1846.  He was Britain’s Ambassador to China during the Second Opium War.  His brother Frederick was Colonial Secretary of Hong Kong during both Opium Wars.  Both were prominent Freemasons.  British Lord Palmerston, who ran the Opium Wars, was a blood relative of the Bruce monarchy, as was his Foreign Secretary John Russell, grandfather of Bertrand Russell. [7]

Children of the Roundtable elite are members of a Dionysian cult known as Children of the SunInitiates include Aldous Huxley, T. S. Eliot, D. H. Lawrence and H. G. Wells.  Wells headed British intelligence during WWI. His books speak of a “one-world brain” and “a police of the mind”.  William Butler Yeats, another Sun member, was a pal of Aleister Crowley.  The two formed an Isis Cult based on a Madam Blavatsky manuscript, which called on the British aristocracy to organize itself into an Isis Aryan priesthood. Most prominent writers of English literature came from the ranks of the Roundtable. All promoted Empire expansion, however subtly.  Blavatsky’s Theosophical Society and Bulwer-Lytton’s Rosicrucians joined forces to form the ThuleSociety out of which the Nazis emerged. [8]

Aleister Crowley formed the British parallel to the Thule Society, the Isis-Urania Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn.  He tutored LSD guru Aldus Huxley, who arrived in the US in 1952, the same year the CIA launched its MK-ULTRA mind control program with help from the Warburg-owned Swiss Sandoz Laboratories and Rockefeller cousin Allen Dulles- OSS Station Chief in Berne. Dulles received information from the Muslim Brotherhood House of Saudi regarding the creation of mind-controlled Assassins.  Dulles’ assistant was James Warburg. [9]

The Atlantic Union (AU) was an RIIA affiliate founded by Cecil Rhodes- who dreamed of returning the US to the British Crown.  In 1939 AU set up its first offices in America in space donated by Nelson Rockefeller at 10 E 40th St in New York City.  Every year from 1949-1976 an AU resolution was floored in Congress calling for a repeal of the Declaration of Independence and a “new world order”.United World Federalists (UWF)- founded by Norman Cousins and Dulles assistant James P. Warburg.  UWF’s motto was “One world or none”.  Its first president Cord Meyer stepped down to take a key position in Allen Dulles’ CIA.  Meyer articulated UWF’s goal, “Once having joined the One-World Federated Government, no nation could secede or revolt…with the atom bomb in its possession the Federal Government would blow that nation off the face of the earth.” [10] Another RIIA affiliate was

In 1950 James Warburg, whose elders Max and Paul sat on the board of Nazi business combine IG Farben,testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “We shall have world government whether or not you like it- by conquest or consent.”  The AU and UAF are close to the CFR and the Trilateral Commission (TC)- founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1974. [11]

The TC published The Triangle Papers which extended the “special relationship between the US and Western Europe” to include Japan, which was fast becoming creditor to the rest of the world.  Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker was TC Chairman.  TC/CFR insider Harvard Professor  Samuel Huntington, who most recently has argued for a “Clash of Civilizations” between the West and the Muslim world, wrote in the TC publication Crisis in Democracy, “…a government which lacks authority will have little ability short of cataclysmic crisis to impose on its people the sacrifices which may be necessary.” [12]

The Illuminati

The Illuminati serves as ruling council to all secret societies.  Its roots go back to the Guardians of Light in Atlantis, the Brotherhood of the Snake in Sumeria, the Afghan Roshaniya, the Egyptian Mystery Schools and the Genoese families who bankrolled the Roman Empire. British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, who “handled” mafia-founder and 33rd Degree Mason Guiseppe Mazzini, alluded to the Illuminati in a speech before the House of Commons in 1856 warning, “There is in Italy a power which we seldom mention. I mean the secret societies.  Europe…is covered with a network of secret societies just as the surfaces of the earth are covered with a network of railroads.”[13]

The Illuminati is to these secret societies what the Bank of International Settlements is to the Eight Families central bankers.  And their constituencies are exactly the same.

The Rothschilds- leaders in Cabala, Freemasonry and the Knights Templar- sit at the apex of the both theIlluminati and the Eight Families banking cartel. The family accumulated its vast wealth issuing war bonds to Black Nobility for centuries, including the British Windsors, the French Bourbons, the German von Thurn und Taxis, the Italian Savoys and the Austrian and Spanish Hapsburgs. The Eight Families have also intermarried with these royals.

The Rothschilds also control the Bank of England.  If there was a war, the Rothschilds were behind the scenes, creating conflict and funding both sides.”[14]

The Rothschilds and the Warburgs are main stockholders of the German Bundesbank. Rothschilds controlJapan’s biggest banking house Nomura Securities via a tie-up between Edmund Rothschild and Tsunao Okumura. The Rothschilds are the richest and most powerful family in the world.  They are also inbred.  According to several family biographers, over half of the last generation of Rothschild progeny married within the family, presumably to preserve their Sangreal. (false “royal” blood line) [15]

The 1782 Great Seal of the United States is loaded with Illuminati symbolism.  So is the reverse side of the US $1 Federal Reserve Note, which was designed by Freemasons.  The pyramid on the left side represents those in Egypt- possibly space beacon/energy source to the Anunnaki- whose Pharaohs oversaw the building of the pyramids using slave labor.

The reptilian eye atop the pyramid depicted on the $1 bill is the all-seeing eye of the Afghan Roshaniya, known alternately as The Order and Order of the Quest- names adopted by Skull & Bones,GermanordenJASON Society. [16]  Take a magnifying glass and look at the eye’s pupil. There is an image of an alien inside the pupil. I’m not kidding. and the

Novus Ordo Seclorum appears beneath the pyramid, while Annuit Coeptis appears above the all-seeing eye. Annuit Coeptis means “may he smile upon our endeavors (Great Work of Ages)”.  Above the eagle on the right side of the note are the words E Pluribus Unum, Latin for “out of many one”.  The eagle clutches 13 arrows and 13 olive branches, while 13 stars appear above the eagle’s head.  America was founded with 13 colonies.

The numbers 3, 9, 13 and 33 are significant to the secret societies. 33rd-degree Freemasons are said to become Illuminati. According to the late researcher William Cooper, the Bilderberger Group has a powerful Policy Committee of 13 members.  It is one of 3 committees of 13 which answered (until his recent death) to Prince Bernhard- member of the Hapsburg family and leader of the Black Nobility.  The Bilderberg Policy Committee answers to a Rothschild Round Table of 9. [17]

[1] “The Secret Financial Network Behind ‘Wizard’ George Soros”. William Engdahl. Executive Intelligence Review. 11-1-96

[2] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.83

[3] Ibid. p.89

[4] Fourth Reich of the Rich. Des Griffin. Emissary Publications. Pasadena, CA. 1978. p.77

[5] The Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.195

[6] Ibid

[7] Dope Inc.: The Book that Drove Kissinger Crazy. The Editors of Executive Intelligence Review. Washington, DC. 1992. p.264

[8] Ibid. p.538

[9] Dope Inc.

[10] Ibid

[11] Ibid

[12] Marrs

[13] Bloodline of the Holy Grail. Laurence Gardner. Element Books, Inc. Rockport, MA. 1996

[14] Holy Blood, Holy Grail. Michael Bagent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln. Dell Publishing Company New York. 1983

[15] Behold a Pale Horse. William Cooper. Light Technology Press. Sedona, AZ. 1991. p.79

[16] Children of the Matrix. David Icke. Bridge of Love Publishing. Scottsdale, AZ. 2000.

[17] Marrs. p.71

The Federal Reserve Cartel: Part IV: A Financial Parasite

June 19, 2011 — Dean Henderson

United World Federalists founder James Warburg’s father was Paul Warburg, who financed Hitler with help from Brown Brothers Harriman partner Prescott Bush. [1]

Colonel Ely Garrison was a close friend of both President Teddy Roosevelt and President Woodrow Wilson.  Garrison wrote in Roosevelt, Wilson and the Federal Reserve, “Paul Warburg was the man who got the Federal Reserve Act together after the Aldrich Plan aroused such nationwide resentment and opposition. The mastermind of both plans was Baron Alfred Rothschild of London.”

The Aldrich Plan was hatched at a secret 1910 meeting at JP Morgan’s private resort on Jekyl Island, SCbetween Rockefeller lieutenant Nelson Aldrich and Paul Warburg of the German Warburg banking dynasty. Aldrich, a New York congressman, later married into the Rockefeller family.  His son Winthrop Aldrich chaired Chase Manhattan Bank.  While the bankers met, Colonel Edward House, another Rockefeller stooge and close confidant of President Woodrow Wilson, was busy convincing Wilson of the importance of a private central bank and the introduction of a national income tax. A member of House’s staff was British MI6 Permindex insider General Julius Klein. [2]

Wilson didn’t need much convincing, since he was beholden to copper magnate Cleveland Dodge, whose namesake Phelps Dodge became one of the biggest mining companies in the world. Dodge bankrolled Wilson’s political career. Wilson even wrote his inaugural speech on Dodge’s yacht. [3]

Wilson was a classmate of both Dodge and Cyrus McCormick at Princeton.  Both were directors at Rockefeller’s National City Bank (now Citigroup).  Wilson’s main focus was on overcoming public distrust of the bankers, which New York City Mayor John Hylan echoed in 1911 when he argued, “The real menace to our republic is the invisible government which, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy length over our city, state and nation.  At the head is a small group of banking houses, generally referred to as the international bankers”. [4]

But the Eight Families prevailed.  In 1913 the Federal Reserve Bank was born, with Paul Warburg its first Governor.  Four years later the US entered World War I, after a secret society known as the Black Hand assassinated Archduke Ferdinand and his Hapsburg wife.  The Archduke’s friend Count Czerin later said, “A year before the war he informed me that the Masons had resolved upon his death.”[5]

That same year, Bolsheviks overthrew the Hohehzollern monarchy in Russia with help from Max Warburg and Jacob Schiff, while the Balfour Declaration leading to the creation of Israel was penned to Zionist Second Lord Rothschild.

In the 1920’s Baron Edmund de Rothschild founded the Palestine Economics Commission, while Kuhn Loeb’s Manhattan offices helped Rothschild form a network to smuggle weapons to Zionist death squads bent on seizing Palestinian lands.  General Julius Klein oversaw the operation and headed the US Army Counterintelligence Corps, which later produced Henry Kissinger.  Klein diverted Marshall Plan aid to Europe to Zionist terror cells in Palestine after WWII, channeling the funds through the Sonneborn Institute, which was controlled by Baltimore chemical magnate Rudolph Sonneborn.  His wife Dorothy Schiff is related to the Warburgs. [6]

The Kuhn Loebs came to Manhattan with the Warburgs. At the same time the Bronfmans came to Canada as part of the Moses Montefiore Jewish Colonization Committee.  The Montefiores have carried out the dirty work of Genoese nobility since the 13th Century.  The di Spadaforas served that function for the Italian House of Savoy, which was bankrolled by the Israel Moses Seif family for which Israel is named.  The Bronfmans tied up with Arnold Rothstein, a product of the Rothschild’s dry goods empire, to found organized crime in New York City.  Rothstein was succeeded by Lucky Luciano, Meyer Lansky, Robert Vesco and Santos Trafficante.  The Bronfmans are intermarried with the Rothschilds, Loebs and Lamberts. [7]

The year 1917 also saw the 16th Amendment added to the US Constitution, levying a national income tax, though it was ratified by only two of the required 36 states.  The IRS is a private corporation registered inDelaware. [8]  Four years earlier the Rockefeller Foundation was launched, to shield family wealth from the new income tax provisions, while steering public opinion through social engineering.  One of its tentacles was the General Education Board.

In Occasional Letter #1 the Board states, “In our dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present education conventions fade from their minds and, unhampered by tradition, we will work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk.  We shall try not to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science…of whom we have ample supply.”[9]

Though most Americans think of the Federal Reserve as a government institution, it is privately held by the Eight Families.  The Secret Service is employed, not by the Executive Branch, but by the Federal Reserve.[10]

An exchange between Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and Fed Chairman Paul Volcker at Senate hearings in 1982 is instructive.  Kennedy must have thought of his older brother John when he told Volcker that if he were before the committee as a member of US Treasury things would be much different. Volcker, puffing on a cigar, responded cavalierly, “That’s probably true. But I believe it was intentionally designed this way”. [11] Rep. Lee Hamilton (D-IN) put it to Volcker that, “People realize that what that board of yours does has a very profound impact on their pocketbooks, and yet it is a group of people basically inaccessible to them and unaccountable to them.”

President Wilson spoke of, “a power so organized, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breaths when they speak in condemnation of it.” Rep. Charles Lindberg (D-NY) was more blunt, railing against Wilson’s Federal Reserve Act, which had cleverly been dubbed the “People’s Bill”.  Lindberg declared that the Act would, “…establish the most gigantic trust on earth…When the president signs this act, the invisible government by the money power will be legitimized. The law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation.  From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.  The invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized.  The whole central bank concept was engineered by the very group it was supposed to strip of power”. [12]

The Fed is made up of most every bank in the US, but the New York Federal Reserve Bank controls the Fed by virtue of its enormous capital resources.  The true center of power within the Fed is the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), on which only the NY Fed President holds a permanent voting seat.  The FOMC issues directives on monetary policy which are implemented from the 8th Floor of the NY Fed, a fortress modeled after the Bank of England. [13]

In the fifth sub-basement of the 14-story stone hulk lie 10,300 tons of mostly non-US gold, 1/3 of the world’s gold reserves and by far the largest gold stock in the world. [14]

The world of money is increasingly computerized.  With the introduction by the Eight Families of complicated financial instruments like derivatives, options, puts and futures; the volume of inter-bank transactions took a quantum leap.  To handle this the fed built a superhighway eerily known as CHIPS (Clearing Interbank Payment System), which is based in New York and modeled after Morgan’s Belgium-based Euro-Clear – also known as The Beast.

When the Fed was created five New York banks- Citibank, Chase, Chemical Bank, Manufacturers Hanover and Bankers Trust- held a 43% stake in the New York Fed.  By 1983 these same five banks owned 53% of the NY Fed.  By year 2000, the newly merged Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank combines owned even bigger chunks, as did the European faction of the Eight Families. Collectively they own majority stock in every Fortune 500 corporation and do the bulk of stock and bond trading.  In 1955 the above five banks accounted for 15% of all stock trades.  By 1985 they were involved in 85% of all stock transactions. [15]

Still more powerful are the investment banks which bear the names of many of the Eight Families. In 1982, while Morgan bankers presided over negotiations between Britain and Argentina after the Falklands War,President Reagan pushed through SEC Rule 415, which helped consolidate securities underwriting in the hands of six large investment houses owned by the Eight Families: Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Salomon Brothers, First Boston and Lehman Brothers. These banks further consolidated their powervia the merger mania of 1980s and 1990s.

American Express swallowed up both Lehman Brothers-Kuhn Loeb – which had merged in 1977 – and Shearson Lehman-Rhoades.  The Israel Moses Seif’s Banca de la Svizzera Italiana bought a 7% stake in Lehman Brothers. [16] Salomon Brothers nabbed Philbro from the South African Oppenheimer family, then bought Smith Barney. All three then became part of Traveler’s Group, headed by Sandy Weill of the David-Weill family, which controls Lazard Freres through senior partner Michel David-Weill.  Citibank then bought Travelers to form Citigroup. S.G. Warburg, of which Oppenheimer’s Chartered Consolidated owns a 9% stake, joined the old money Banque Paribas- which merged into Merrill Lynch in 1984.  Union Bank of Switzerland acquired Paine Webber, while Morgan Stanley ate up Dean Witter and purchased Discover credit card operations from Sears.

Kuhn Loeb-controlled First Boston merged with Credit Suisse, which had already absorbed White-Weld, to become CS First Boston- the major player in the dirty London Eurobond market.  Merrill Lynch – merged into Bank of America in 2008 – is the major player on the US side of this trade.  Swiss Banking Corporation merged with London’s biggest investment house S.G. Warburg to create SBC Warburg, while Warburg became more intertwined with Merrill Lynch through their 1998 Mercury Assets tie up.  The Warburg’s formed another venture with Union Bank of Switzerland, creating powerhouse UBS Warburg.  Deutsche Bank bought Banker’s Trust and Alex Brown to briefly become the world’s largest bank with $882 billion in assets.  With repeal of Glass-Steagal, the line between investment, commercial and private banking disappeared.

This handful of investment banks exerts an enormous amount of control over the global economy.  Their activities include advising Third World debt negotiations, handling mergers and breakups, creating companies to fill a perceived economic void through the launching of initial public stock offerings (IPOs), underwriting all stocks, underwriting all corporate and government bond issuance, and pulling the bandwagon down the road of privatization and globalization of the world economy.

A recent president of the World Bank was James Wolfensohn of Salomon Smith Barney.  Merrill Lynch had $435 billion in assets in 1994, before the merger frenzy had really even gotten under way.  The biggest commercial bank at the time, Citibank, could claim only $249 billion in assets.

In 1991 Merrill Lynch handled 26.8% of all global bank mergers.  Morgan Stanley did 16.8%, Goldman Sachs 16.3%, Lehman Brothers 16.1% and Credit Suisse First Boston 14.5%.  Morgan Stanley did $60 billion in corporate mergers in 1989.  By 2007, reflecting the repeal of Glass-Steagel, the top ten NMA advisers in order were: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, UBS Warburg, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank and Lazard. In the IPO stock underwriting field for 1991 the top four were Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and CS First Boston.  In the arena of global privatization for years 1985-1995, Goldman Sachs led the way doing $13.3 billion worth of deals.  UBS Warburg did $8.2 billion, BNP Paribas $6.8 billion, CS First Boston $4.9 billion and Paribas-owner Merrill Lynch $4.4 billion. [17]

In 2006 BNP Paribas bought the notorious Banca Nacionale de Lavoro (BNL), which led the charge in arming Saddam Hussein. According to Global Finance, it is now the world’s largest bank with nearly $3 trillion in assets.

The leading US debt underwriters for the first nine months of 1995 bore the same familiar names.  Merrill Lynch underwrote $74.2 billion in the US debt markets, or 15.3% of the total.  Lehman Brothers handled $52.5 billion, Morgan Stanley $47.4 billion, Salomon Smith Barney $45.6 billion.  CS First Boston, Chase Manhattan and Goldman Sachs rounded out the top seven.  The top three municipal debt underwriters that year were Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and UBS Paine Webber.  In the euro-market the top four underwriters in 1995 were UBS Warburg, Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. [18] Deutsche Bank’s Morgan Grenfell branch engineered the corporate takeover binge in Europe.

The dominant players in the oil futures markets at both the New York Mercantile Exchange and the London Petroleum Exchange are Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Goldman Sachs (through its J. Aron & Company subsidiary), Citigroup (through its Philbro unit) and Deutsche Bank (through its Banker’s Trust acquisition).  In 2002 Enron Online was auctioned off by a bankruptcy court to UBS Warburg for $0.  UBS was to share monopoly Enron Online profits with Lehman Brothers after the first two years of the deal. [19] With Lehman’s 2008 demise, its new owner Barclays will get their cut.

Following the Lehman Brothers fiasco and the ensuing financial meltdown of 2008, the Four Horsemen of Banking got even bigger. For pennies on the dollar, JP Morgan Chase was handed Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual. Bank of America commandeered Merrill Lynch and Countrywide. And Wells Fargo seized control over the reeling #5 US bank Wachovia. Barclays got a sweetheart deal for the remains of Lehman Brothers.

Former House Banking Committee Chairman Wright Patman (D-TX), declared of Federal Reserve Eight Families owners, “The United States today has in effect two governments.  We are the duly constituted government.  Then we have an independent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to Congress by the Constitution”. [20]

Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, US debt (mostly owed to the Eight Families) has skyrocketed from $1 billion to nearly $14 trillion today. This far surpasses the total of all Third World country debt combined, debt which is mostly owed to these same Eight Families, who own most all the world’s central banks.

As Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-AZ) pointed out, “International bankers make money by extending credit to governments.  The greater the debt of the political state, the larger the interest returned to lenders.  The national banks of Europe are (also) owned and controlled by private interests.  We recognize in a hazy sort of way that the Rothschilds and the Warburgs of Europe and the houses of JP Morgan, Kuhn Loeb & Co., Schiff, Lehman and Rockefeller possess and control vast wealth.  How they acquire this vast financial power and employ it is a mystery to most of us.”[21]

[1] Behold a Pale Horse. William Cooper. Light Technology Press. Sedona, AZ. 1991. p.81

[2] Dope Inc.: The Book that Drove Kissinger Crazy. The Editors of Executive Intelligence Review. Washington, DC. 1992.

[3] Democracy for the Few. Michael Parenti. St. Martin’s Press. New York. 1977. p.67

[4] Descent into Slavery. Des Griffin. Emissary Publications. Pasadena 1991

[5] The Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.158

[6] The Editors of Executive Intelligence Review. p.504

[7] Ibid

[8] Ibid

[9] Ibid. p.77

[10] “Secrets of the Federal Reserve”. Discovery Channel. January 2002

[11] The Confidence Game: How Un-Elected Central Bankers are Governing the Changed World Economy. Steven Solomon. Simon & Schuster. New York. 1995. p.26

[12] Icke. p.178

[13] Solomon. p.63

[14] Ibid. p.27

[15] The Corporate Reapers: The Book of Agribusiness. A.V. Krebs. Essential Books. Washington, DC. 1992. p.166

[16] The Editors of Executive Intelligence Review. p.79

[17] “Playing the Middle”. Anita Raghavan and Bridget O’Brian. Wall Street Journal. 10-2-95

[18] Securities Data Corporation. 1995

[19] CNN Headline News. 1-11-02

[20] The Rockefeller File. Gary Allen. ’76 Press. Seal Beach, CA. 1977. p.156

[21] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.77

Dean Henderson is the author of Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network and The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries. His Left Hookblog is at

Money As Debt – The Rothschild Mafia (Paul Grignon)

The Rothschild Cartel even controls the medical system!

Shocking history on how the modern Western medical system developed!

A Little More on How the Rothschild’s Operate for Control:

How the World Government Operates:  A very informative and insightful look into how the elite are taking control of the world and bringing about their harmful tyranny to dominate and destroy humanity.  Iemphasized some of the key points with yellow highlight and made some comments for further clarification using [backets].

The Coming World Government



Lucid and aware people observing world events unfold over the past decade or so – say, since September 11, 2001 – will have surely asked themselves what on Earth is going on here? We see ever-growing violence, war, outright lies, invasions, false flags, social upheavals, poverty, ruin and the death of millions… The world’s become a pretty dangerous and pitiful place to live in, and it only gets worse…

Which leads us to the obvious question: Why? Why is all this happening? Can we explain it away as Man’s wicked nature? Or his folly and ignorance? Perhaps just a series of bad mistakes and wrong turns on key issues?

Most everybody will have a ready reply, no doubt coloured by his or her own philosophical outlook. The more rational will say it’s just wrong decisions taken by normal people in an environment of growing complexity. Optimists will shrug their shoulders playing things down with the quaint statement that there’s always been war, persecution, poverty and corruption… Pessimists, as always, will complain that we’re all doomed, especially if they are “2012-repent-the-end-of-the-world-draws-nigh” types. What, then, should we think?

First, A Word About “Conspiracies…”

If you don’t buy any of the above explanations, and you feel that today’s calamities are being purposefully engineered – that some group of people somewhere control the course of world events – then be careful because you risk being branded another paranoid, hallucinating, conspiracy theory kook.

Don’t let that worry you too much because those who disqualify as mere “conspiracy theories” any attempt to put together an alternative model of how global power really works are either, (a) blissfully ignorant and believe in the “world according to CNN and FoxNews”; (b) near-sighted on key long-term geopolitical processes; or (c) purposely deceptive and thus have an axe to grindprotecting the Global Power Elite, which always reacts with uneasiness whenever someone shines a light on them. I will only deal with the last of these options.

Debunking “conspiracy theory” accusations is really not all that hard because what is thus branded is really just normal human behaviour. Or should we yell “Conspiracy!” every time two or more people having common interests and goals come together to coordinate and articulate their actions, joining forces to promote such goals and objectives more easily and with a higher degree of certainty? We see this at work in our community, schools, even in our own families. Such normal human behaviour is so ubiquitous that nobody bothers to mention it – that is not until you point out the highest echelons of world power also do exactly the same.

Every time somebody says very powerful individuals and entities quite predictably also engage in common actions, planning, and agreements in order to achieve common goals, the “C-word” kicks in with all its might ready to kill any such line of thought or investigation dead in its tracks.

How dare you say that global bankers plot to manipulate money and finance so they can control economies, markets, governments and the media! How dare you insinuate that the rich and powerful create organisations like the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) or the Trilateral Commission to do their geopolitical mega planning supporting long-term Global Power Elite interests bent on imposing World Government on Mankind! How can you be so paranoid as to even suggest that Money Power uses its clout to place “their people” in the White House, Parliament, Downing Street, the Casa Rosada, and Editors’ desks in all major media outlets?

That is the mainstream reaction whenever we speak of bankers, oil men, defence contractors, politicians, journalists and their respective corporations, organisations, banks, lobbies, lodges, armies – who all most clearly do have common interests and objectives – coming together and using their vast money flows to exert iron-fist control over society. This is all so obvious that only very naïve people (or very cheeky “analysts” on the Elite payroll!) conclude otherwise. What is really naïve is to think that George Soros never picks up the phone to discuss mutual plans with Sir Henry Kissinger or Christine Lagarde; or that David Rockefeller never dines with his Rothschild, Morgan and Warburg brethren.

Don’t be taken aback by the “C” word. Whoever uses it to silence lucid and aware people do so because they know nothing is more dangerous to them than… lucid and aware people!

Let’s now take a look at how the world really works, call it “conspiracy” or otherwise.

World Government

The dream of erecting a world government controlled by a very small, extremely powerful and elusive minority goes back several centuries. Its roots lie not just on the political stage but, more so, in social, cultural and religious spheres, often with symbolic, “occult” overtones.

In our time it has been variously described under the guise of “New World Order,” “One World,” “Over-World” and, more recently, “Globalisation.” Call it what you will, the facts are that national sovereignty, which is the ability of the People to organise around nation-states, to make the final decisions on their own affairs, from being a sharply defined concept is now so eroded and diffuse that no one can readily define exactly what sovereignty means today.

Maybe this would be acceptable if national sovereignty were lessened for the sake of better coping with global problems affecting Mankind as a whole – for the Common Good – however increasing famine, disease, contamination and war shows a very different picture. Why? The reason is that basically World Government is not emerging around robust global public institutions that have (or should have) the Public Good of We the People in the forefront, but rather around private organisations that have sectorial profit and interests at their forefront. In fact, the World Government we see rising before our eyes has one key, seldom mentioned, characteristic: it’s private.

Private Power

Let’s start from basics: what drives the world today is not justice, it’s not the pursuit of the Common Good, nor international law, nor ethical values, nor democracy. What governs the world is Power and today Power has been illegitimately amassed in the hands of a tiny usurping minority. What do we mean by “Power”?

Firstly, Power is the concrete ability to plan, promote, organise, and carry out actions, the results of which invariably lead to specific and desired objectives and goals in the short, medium and long terms. Power is the capacity and ability to make certain things happen irrespective of any resistance, and at the same time blocking certain other things from happening irrespective of their force; if need be by war…

This definition spans political, economic, industrial, financial, business, technological, cultural, psychological and (usually, in the last instance) military stages. The exercise of Power requires coordinated and intelligent use of all resources at hand – whether plentiful or lean, physical or virtual – with the view of achieving concrete objectives and goals.

Secondly, we should differentiate Formal Power from Real Power. What the media show us are the very high profile visible results of actions carried out by Formal Power structures, i.e., national governments, financial markets and the media.However, Real Power levers that make things happen are far less visible. They plan out what happens in the world, when it happens, where, and who makes it happen. Symmetries between Real Power and Formal Power help explain how our global system works. Let’s recap:

Real Power is centred on discrete proactive structures and organisations that drive concrete and effective political, economic and social processes in a nation, a region, a social class, a public or private institution, or a combination of these. Its effectiveness stems from its continuity in time that allows it to grow and leverage its capacity for world domination. Real Power structures drive causes which, although themselves not visible, nevertheless generate highly visible results.

Formal Power is centred on structures that are for the most part reactive executors of strategies and decisions emanating from Real Power structures. These include high profile structures like major multinational corporations, transnational banks, multimedia monopolies, key universities and the top echelons of government in all countries (presidents, cabinet members, congressmen, judges). Formal Power structures are accountable for high-profile effects that have their roots in low profile causes emanating from Real Power structures.

The conquest and use of power has much in common with surfing: a dangerous staying balanced, a perilous not falling off the board, a flexible control of speed, direction and pitch. Good surfers “ride the wave” just as Italian philosopher Julius Evola recommended we learn to “Ride the tiger...” Come to think of it power also seems to have a feline, hunting and preying style and gait to it.

This leads to the need of clearly grasping a fundamental and harsh “Law of Power”: Those who have Power use it to promote and drive their objectives and interests; those who do NOT have Power must suffer the consequences of the actions of those who do have the Power to promote and drive theirobjectives and interests.

Here lie the roots of the dramatic situation most countries suffer today because power is no longer in the hands of people and organisations working towards the Common Good.

The Pyramid

It helps to approach Power from a Corporate viewpoint. After all, the modern corporation developed, thrived and survived enormously over centuries of time becoming a key driver in the on-going shift that “privatised” power, transferring the reins of control from public political institutions to eminently private economic structures articulated in three vertical hierarchical levels:

Shareholders, who are the real owners and controllers of the Corporation, even if they seldom or ever become involved in its operational and administrative processes. Shareholders focus on finance, not economic production;

Directors, who represent shareholders and supervise/oversee the correct, efficient and proper operation of the Corporation in accordance with shareholder interest. They are accountable for ensuring maximum growth of present and future stock yields with minimum expense, thus making the [current state of elite control of] capitalist corporation intrinsically an antisocial agent.

Managers, who are well-paid employees accountable for the day-to-day running of the Corporation. Normally, they are trained and hard working specialists who add value to the Corporation through their talent, organisational skills and discipline.

Today the superstructure of a veritable World Government already exist, but for the most part we do not recognise it as suchbecause the paradigms normally associated with the concept of “government” are not readily visible. Rather, since power has become privatised, today’s World Government has much more in common with traditional private power structures described above. This lies at the very foundations of “globalisation,” where power is private and “democracy” is the preferred political system through which private power structures control public government i.e., through money.

Therefore [Formal] public power – “government” – in almost every country can only occupy the lower level of decision-making (President, Prime Minister, Congress, Parliament, etc.). Medium and upper level decisions all lie above or outside national governments and countries, so we the People have no access or control over them, even though they deeply affect us all. Let’s have a closer look at how this hierarchy of global power plays out in practice:

Top Level Decisions (i.e., the “Owners” of this world) – Geopolitical Scope

In the private corporate world, upper level decisions are taken by shareholders. In the public World Government this is done by the Global Power Elite. Save in major countries as the US, UK, Russia, China and France, national governments have little or no access to this upper decision level where the “Masters of the World” wield Real Power. This is all coordinated by and grouped around the following major axes dealing with the geopolitical:

Think Tanks – A compact, hierarchical, seamless and very powerful global network of geostrategic planning centres – so-called “think tanks” – notably, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Trilateral Commission (TC), Bilderberg Group, Royal Institute of International Affairs (“Chatham House”), World Economic Forum, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), amongst others.Their job is to plan out the long-term development of complex political, economic, financial, technological, military and cultural processes, integrating them into consistent, sustainable and complex geopolitical models, geared to achieving growing long-term national, regional and global domination. [Actually, this is the 2nd and 3rd tier of the elite’s pyramid power structure.  Some of the mid to lower level "stockholders" will mix in with these groups, but primarily the "Stink Tanks" often consist of the high level directors.]

Finance Dynastic Families wielding immense economic, financial and social power and fortune since generations, even centuries: i.e., Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Mellon, Bin-Laden, Bush, Buffet and others.

Royal Dynasties and Noble Bloodlines who wielded social, economic, religious and financial Power for centuries (i.e., the ruling nobilities of Britain, Holland, Spain, Belgium, as well as the “uncrowned nobilities” in France, Germany, Austria, Italy and Portugal). They closely link-in with their counterparts in Islamic sheikdoms and patrician financial “nobilities” in the US and Far East.  [These two groups are at the top of the pyramid, with the elite European Banking families being the largest stockholders. These ultra rich trillionaires are the heads of Illuminati (meaning the ones illuminated or enlightened).  They are directly influenced by the angel of light himself, Lucifer, as they prepare the world to receive their Antichrist – 2 Corinthians 11:14-15]

Religious Organisations – Political structures of key religious faiths, notably The Vatican, Church of England, Lutheran and Calvinist Churches, the Jewish Sanhedrin, Evangelical and Pentecostal organisations, many of them staunchly pro-Zionist; [At their highest level these are only secondary, simply another level of Formal Power, which for a time in the near future will supersede other secular Formal Powers – Revelation 17:18.  The religious organizations are a "necessary evil" for the elite power brokers/stockholders to use for controlling the masses.  The coming ten world governors will use the one world religious harlot for their purposes, then they will destroy her swiftly, when they no longer need her – Revelation 17:12-13, 16-17 and 18:8.]

Supranational Political Structures – Freemasonry, Zionism, International Social Democracy, International Christian Democracy, various NGO’s and lobbies.  [These would fall under the 3rd to 5th levels of the pyramid structure.  However, some of these groups, particularly the secret societies, are wide spread and intermix within many levels and areas of the pyramid power structure, often causing them to be miss diagnosed as to their actual role and/or place within the pyramid of power. 

The confusion can be found within the hidden, or Occult, spiritual aspect of certain groups that are known to be involved with the forces of darkness at their highest levels, i.e. the Masons.  If one refuses to understand that the spiritual forces of darkness are well connected and operating on many levels (and has, at least, a fair grasp of how they are coordinated together), then their perception becomes clouded or skewed, upending or shuffling the order of power within the pyramid.  In my opinion, this type of miss identification happen for Mr. Salbuchi concerning his analysis of the groups that actually operate on this level.] Here we find the highest echelons of global power coming together at its pyramidal apex. No doubt, whatever lies behind “Illuminati” tradition dwells here: a compact Round Table of “Elders” representing money power, Dynastic families, Kings, Queens and Sheiks, Vaticanpriests, Rabbis, Lutheran and Anglican clergy, and the bloodlines from where the future “King of the World” shall arise. The buck stops there.  [The highest rulers of the Illuminati pyramid of power are without a doubt contained within the Rothschild family.]

Organised CrimeNot surprisingly organised crime interacts with “legitimate” power structures and may even be created by them under various “operational agreements” [i.e. the "Fast and Furious" scandal]. This brings under the fold variousMafias, arms dealers, drug cartels, money launderers, plus their respective financial managers [i.e. certain banks]. Boundaries are not clear-cut because organised criminal groups seem to have successfully embedded themselves into legitimate organisations, including the CIA, MI6, Mossad, DEA, FBI, SEC, financial institutions, stock exchanges, and armed and security forces. The New World Order power structure contains pacts and agreements forged with major criminal organisations willing to respect and abide by unwritten guidelines and rules of engagement.

Mid-Level Decisions (the “Deciders”) – Strategic Scope

In the private corporate world, these are in the hands of the Directors. In the public World Government this refers to a set of major players: multinational corporations, transnational financial institutions, media monopolies, major universities, and specific sectors in all national governments, notably in the areas of foreign policy, economics and defence.

They direct and channel huge resources to finance political campaigns that promote previously screened, selected and approved political parties and candidates, maintaining a credible balance and image in order to ensure the electorate always have the – albeit, false – impression that “the people elect those who govern them”: let’s call this the “democracy game.”

Monopoly multimedia organisations, in turn, execute intense short-term PsyOps campaigns (e.g., right before an election), whilst the educational system executes medium- and long-term psychological pressure to ensure the population at large believe, accept, embrace and play the “democracy game” questioning little or nothing about it.

Lower Level Decisions (Day-to-Day “Operators”) – Operational Scope

In the private corporate world, these are in the hands of Managers. In the public World Government, these are “the Authorities:i.e., governments, law enforcement agencies, armed & security forces, controlling and supervisory entities, and the like. It includes “The President” or “Prime Minister” as head of the Executive Branch, Congressmen and women (or Parliamentarians) in the Legislative, and judges in the Judiciary branches of public government.

A nation’s president or prime minister is thus limited to merely executing short-term management level decisions during their short tenures in office (usually, three or four years with, perhaps, one possible re-election term: clearly too short a span to consolidate continuity of power). They can be described as the “CEO’s” of our countries with clipped wings and permanently challenged by a similar tightly controlled group of pre-selected “opposition” candidates, also canvassed, screened and approved by the “Directors” and “Shareholders” of the Global Power Elite who control the whole democracy game, financing costly election campaigns and media-based PsyOps.


Another major cause of violence and conflict today is that financial, economic and social processes have very different dynamics and their own “time” factors, so to speak:

Finance (High Speed Change) – Modern technology allow finance to move instantaneously as financial operators and players around the world speculate, invest, divest, migrate from one market to another, from one currency to another, using extremely powerful computer, software and telecom networks at the speed of light, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Dynamics: Finance’s “time” runs in seconds and minutes, and has become highly automated. This huge advantage helps to explain why Finance today reigns supreme over us all.

Economy (Moderate Speed Change) – Economic processes run at a much slower pace because building cars, airplanes, and TV sets; manufacturing cookies and clothing; rendering services, erecting plants and factories; training and recruiting workers, requires planning, knowledge, time and effort.

Dynamics: Economy’s “time” runs in days, weeks, months, even years. The Real Economy thus operates at a slower speed than Virtual Finance to which it is unnaturally subordinated.

Societal (Slow Speed Change) – Collective processes governing changes in mental paradigms, ethical values, social customs, habits and styles, etc., are much, much slower still. Today, we experience unprecedented social and cultural “re-engineering” on a planetary scale. The two main instruments driving Social Change are:

The School System – Education on social, cultural, economic and political matters has become distorted, contaminated, deconstructed, eroded, emptied of content and turned upside down, on all manners that need accommodating and alignment to support and promote the mental profile that Global Power Elite planners demand.

The Media – Aside from distorting our world view of reality through the press, it also uses “entertainment” and “show business” to promote demoralising, destructive, often perverse content, inspired by the age-old collective dumbing-down method prevalent in the latter days of the Roman Empire – panem et circenses: bread and circuses – with the “added value” of today’s technologies.

Dynamics: Social and cultural change is [usually] very slow. Its “time” runs in decades, generations; even centuries.

The “Wheel” of World Power

Today’s global geopolitical power architecture would look something like this:

Major Multinational Industrial Corporations – The Fortune 500 of industry, services, retailing, oil, energy, mining, R&D, defence, aerospace, foodstuff, agricultural, chemical, construction, shipping, consulting, etc.

Private Financial Institutions – Inter- and trans-national banks, financial consultants, risk-rating agencies, stock exchanges, fund managers, insurance and reinsurance companies, pensions and investment funds, etc.

Multilateral National and Supranational Entities – The International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), Bank of International Settlements, all national central banks, notably the US Federal Reserve Bank and the European Central Bank, the United Nations, and others.

Universities and Academia – In political science, international and government relations, and economics (i.e., Harvard, MIT,Columbia, Princeton, Yale, Johns Hopkins, Chicago, Stanford, Georgetown, Oxford, Cambridge, London School of Economics).

Multimedia Monopolies The New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek, CNN-Time Warner, CBS, MSNBC, Fox, BBC, The Economist, Der Spiegel, Foreign Affairs, Reuters.

Government – Key domestic and foreign policy, economic, financial and monetary posts [i.e. The U.S. Treasury].

In order to serve New World Order goals and interests, this “Wheel of Power” must spin in a specificdirection, steered from its hub which is controlled by a discrete, though not secret, network of think-tanks and geopolitical planning centres, acting flexibly, sequentially and consistently. It gives each of the major axes of power their specific “libretto,” to act out so that each, at the right time, does what it needs to do within a much wider plan spanning the world for decades to come.

This is a highly hierarchical, disciplined, pyramid-like scheme and as we observe its operators and players further down the pyramid they become increasingly numerous and less aware of the “full picture.” As in the intelligence community, each player operates on a “need to know” basis, where only those at the very top or near the apex can have a bird’s eye view of what is happening, and how everything ties in neatly into a long-term Master Plan. For those with a taste for the symbolic, that’s the All-Seeing Eye symbol on the US one-dollar bill…

Big Money Power

Big money power is profoundly anti-democratic. It has always surprised me the way politicians, the media, “intellectuals,” academics and opinion-makers speak mouthfuls about “democracy” insisting it be imposed upon everybody everywhere and yet we never hear a word about the urgent need of democratising finance and the economy. There’s a taboo around that idea, even though it is absolutely plain for all to see that finance and the economy are governed by strict authoritarianism of a most undemocratic flavour [i.e. the massive (and often brutal) security forces at the economic summits and the top level security at the Bilderberg meetings]. However, none of the people who should point this out to global public opinion – journalists, analysts, politicians – dare do so.

Poderoso Señor es Don Dinero” – Money is a Powerful Lord – wrote Spanish poet Don Francisco de Quevedo y Villegas four centuries ago. And it is certainly sobering to see how this powerful gentleman, “Lord Money,” marches ever so strong in our terrible 21st century.

World Government is already upon us. For many decades it has functioned as a sort of global “shadow government” preparing to take a major leap to become a formal and “legally” binding World Government. It confronts the world with a system of thought in which “democracy” and capitalism contain their own values, which means that in order to participate in them, we must accept those values; even transcendental values on such matters as justice, happiness and the like. Citizens must therefore give up their minds to the System, which is neither political nor economic, but rather a system of consciousness[Jesus said that we cannot love both God and money, we will love and serve one and hate the other – Matthew 6:24.]

Democracy and capitalism are systems of consciousness. People do not realise this but their minds are determined by these systems. This is why democracy and [the current elite controlled] capitalism represent a totalitarian regime. Totalitarianism means total control of society… never has there been totalitarianism as strong as we have today. The totalitarianism of the democratic and capitalist systems is so sophisticated, that even our desires are determined by the System. We desire that which society wishes we desire.

It cannot be said loud enough. If true democracy is government of, by and for the majority of We the People for the purpose of protecting and promoting the Common Good, and the “democracy game” we’re all forced to play today is fully subservient and subordinated to UNdemocratic money power, then it follows that there is NO democracy, anywhere.

Not to understand this is not to understand how the global power system really works which, in turn, means not being able to arrive at a correct diagnosis as to why things are going badly in this world. And if we don’t get our diagnostics right, then no cure will ever be found for this sickly state of affairs. It’s high time we open our minds and eyes to this!  
[No, actually this world system exists from the top down, greatest to the least, because of sin, which breeds the love of money, which literally fuels the authoritarian beast that is predicted rule the world.  Men will never be able to rule themselves because of this, no matter what form of rule they choose.  Jesus Christ is the only answer to our sin problem.  Apart from Him we have no hope.]

ADRIAN SALBUCHI is a political analyst, author, speaker and radio talk-show host in Argentina. He has published several books on Geopolitics and Economics in Spanish, and recently published his first eBook in English: The Coming World Government: Tragedy & Hope? which can be ordered through his web site, or details can be requested by E-mail to Salbuchi is 58 years of age, married, with four adult children, and works as strategic consultant for domestic and international companies. He is also founder of the Second Republic Project in Argentina, which is expanding internationally (visit:

Visit the TruthandLife store at:


Transhumanism, Eugenics & Elite Bloodlines

Transhumanism: The New Face of Eugenics

Tuesday, March 29th, 2011.

by Zen Gardner

My wife sent me a photo of this book cover (below) from an airplane magazine. I haven’t read the book, but I can tell already he’s on target, or at least is broaching an important subject with some urgency. Especially when reviewers say “it’s not as close as he thinks but he makes some good points.”

It’s not?

(not plugging the book…but pictures tell so much…)

What is Transhumanism?

Transhumanism has a variety of definitions and can be made to appear as just an innocuous notion. We’re plagued with mechanization and digitalization. It moves information, ourselves, our economy. How can it be bad? Why not use it to enhance our capabilities?

Yeah, but where do you draw the line? What’s really going on?

Wiki says;

“The transhumanist vision of a transformed future humanity, which is influenced by the techno-utopias depicted in some great works of science fiction, has attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of perspectives.[4]Transhumanism has been condemned by one critic, Francis Fukuyama, as the world’s most dangerous idea,[6] while one proponent, Ronald Bailey, counters that it is the “movement that epitomizes the most daring, courageous, imaginative, and idealistic aspirations of humanity”.[7]

OK, make it look like there’s some discussion on the matter, blah blah. In reality it’s all over the place and getting shoved down our throats as the “wave of the future”. From commercials to pop stars to military “breakthroughs” we’re seeing the robotization agenda in full swing.

It’s a definite dehumanizing trend that is being programmed into an unsuspecting human population.

HAL robot – Iron Man movie character and Sarcos XOS military exoskeletons…now icons
“But it’s helping us…”

The impetus for this “bionic body” gains its momentum from the health (s)care faction. There are wonderful inventions to help humanity. No doubt.

But just like splitting the atom can go both ways, so does everything. And right now, the Controllers are ruling. They have the technology to help the blind see, the immobilized move, replace missing limbs…

But don’t be fooled. The PTBs are always out to control. Period.

More popular literature on the subject.

Fact is, you see it everywhere. There’s a new mechanized apparatus every day for some new “improvement”. Do you think things are improving? Sure, things run quicker and faster, but where? Does it matter? Has efficiency become the “drug of choice”, as long as we’re numb and dumb to the effects.

Are we letting our humanity be erased out of expediency and our lack of willingness to deal with the reality of what’s happening?

Origins of the “Transhumanist Agenda”

Transhumanism is essentially eugenics. It’s the lessening of the human factor in humanity for the sake of the few who control.

Here’s a terrific quote on the profound impact of the transhumanist agenda:

Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous who authored Brave New World, first used this word: Transhumanism. Huxley was a member of the British Eugenics Society, eugenics being the foundation of Transhumanism.

Eugenics is a science dedicated to a Darwinist philosophy applied to humanity, that the strong should thrive and evolve, while the weak are culled and eradicated.

Eugenics rests on a necessity of there being superior and inferior genetic pools in the human population. It might be very socially unacceptable to speak publicly of there being some races, ethnic or cultural groups who are inferior to the rest, yet in secrecy this is exactly what elite Eugenicists believe.

The public is guided to love the idea of Transhumanism by being persuaded that it is not a goal attached to race or ethnicity, but simply a means of bettering all of humanity. This is quite untrue.

Elite Transhumanists have no desire to “evolve” all humankind, their goal is one which seeks to advance only their own bloodlines and to leave the rest in disadvantage to them so that these unfortunate ones have no choice but to become their slaves, their lab animals and their labor force.

“The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore… they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation.”

– Julian Huxley

The elite, as they are wrongly called, are blood relations of one another, descending from the hybrid tyrants who ruled in result of this same Transhumanist philosophy pre-flood. (timenolonger)


Huxleys having the ‘inside scoop’ is no accident…

Speaking of Julian Huxley, yes, he’s the brother of Aldous, “foretelling” author of Brave New World that also just happens to cover this very subject, with precognitive awareness of the coming pharmaceutically adapted, genetically sculptored society and more. Ahem.

Elite geniuses? Or co-conspirators in constructing this “brave” new world odor (not misspelling). As David Icke says, these bloodlines have other dimensional capabilities to see down the timeline to future events. Somehow, these Huxley boys, George Orwell, HG Wells, Darwin and many others had the “Inside scoop” or agenda “talking points”. Think about it.

And so does occult insider Hollywood.  It’s programming.

Hollywood’s productions are not mere entertainment. It’s a form of psycho-entrainment, teaching humanity to resonate with whatever themes and memes it wishes to introduce into the human consciousness.

And transhumanism is HUGE in their agenda.

Meet the Huxleys

Sir Julian Sorell Huxley FRS (22 June 1887 – 14 February 1975) was an English evolutionary biologist, humanist andinternationalist.

Read “globalist”. Notice these elitist guys are always knighted, given Nobel prizes, have freakish success stories and are involved in nature preservation groups. It’s all in their giant game of Risk they play for future world domination, and we are just expendable pawns in their eyes.

He was a proponent of natural selection, and a leading figure in the mid-twentieth century evolutionary synthesis. He was Secretary of the Zoological Society of London (1935–1942), the first Director of UNESCO, and a founding member of theWorld Wildlife Fund.

(Julian) Huxley came from the distinguished Huxley family. His brother was the writer Aldous Huxley, and his half-brother a fellow biologist and Nobel laureate, Andrew Huxley; his father was writer and editor Leonard Huxley; and his paternal grandfather was Thomas Henry Huxley, a friend and supporter of Charles Darwin and proponent of evolution. His maternal grandfather was the academic Tom Arnold, great-uncle poet Matthew Arnold and great-grandfather.

Lotta connections there. “Distinguished”, by the way, by the same elites who put them there. Whatta scam. People are groomed to worship their destroyers.

It also says…

Huxley was well-known for his presentation of science in books and articles, and on radio and television. He was awarded UNESCO’s Kalinga Prize for the popularisation of science in 1953, the Darwin Medal of the Royal Society in 1956, and theDarwin–Wallace Medal of the Linnaean Society in 1958. He was also knighted in that same year, 1958, a hundred years after Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace announced the theory of evolution by natural selection. In 1959 he received a Special Award of the Lasker Foundation in the category Planned ParenthoodWorld Population. Huxley was a prominent member of the British Eugenics Society, and its President from 1959–1962. (Source)

Eugenics at the inception. Interesting. You think Darwinism, Brave New World, Eugenics, and Transhumanism might have some common threads? And on rolls the agenda. (See The (Bill) Gates of Hell Foundation for a mega eugenacist.)

The elites think they know better. Check your Georgia Guidestones again.

And please, fully wake up and take action. This is not information to tickle the ears. Thanks. We each influence many and do make a mighty difference.


“The ancient ambition of the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies, the “Great Plan,” is the establishment of an Occult Hierarchy that presides over a long-dreamed for One World Government and a One World Religion. That is, the Occult Hierarchy ruling directly and in full public view as the supreme leaders of the Novus Ordo Seclorum … the New World Order. Freemasonry has been superbly cultivated by the Black Adepts, Secret Leaders of the New World Order Plan, to become the main vehicle of this externalisation of the Occult Hierarchy.”- Manly P. Hall


by Tracy R. Twyman

from ImplosionGroup Website

October 28th, 1998, a number of newspapers across the country ran an Associated Press article entitled "Presidential Hopefuls Share Blue Blood Lines."

The article, based on information put forth by Burke’s Peerage, claims that every single President of the United States has had a notable amount of royal European ancestry, and in each Presidential race, the one with the most royal genes is the one who wins – every single time. This tendency has been noted in supposedly Democratic European politics as well, prompting some to charge that a global conspiracy exists to keep power within the hands of a specific gene pool.
This charge is not entirely baseless, and many books have been written tracing the modern aristocratic bloodlines back to the royal houses of Israel, Egypt, Sumer, and beyond. The charge is further supported by the fact that many of the supposed conspirators proudly boast about the ancient origins of their ancestry. The traditional explanation for why power is passed down through the ages by blood has been the mystical Divine Right of Kings.

This dates back to the 17th century and states that a king is created by God, and kingly authority resides in the blood irrespective of anything else. Many have claimed that there is a genetic characteristic carried in the blood itself which makes this so, but what would it be?

Is there a legitimate physiological reason behind the Divine Right of Kings?

Fields of the Nephilim

The all-important element of the Divine Right is that it comes from God, or "the gods," alternately. And who were these gods? Authors such as Zecharia Sitchin, Sir Laurence Gardner and Nicolas de Vere are authoritatively convinced that kingship was created by an advanced race of beings called the Anunnaki, also called the Nephilim in the Old Testament.

These were the ones who created the human race and interbred with a portion of it to create the kingly caste which until this day has still maintained control over the Earth.
These celestial creatures have been variously identified with:

  • Dragons

  • Elves

  • Fairies

  • Gnomes

  • Leprechauns

  • Sprites

  • Nymphs

  • Pixies

  • Angels

  • Demons

  • Devils

  • Witches

  • Giants

  • Vampires

  • Werewolves

  • and just about every mythical being you can imagine

Some, like Gardner and Sitchin, claim that they come from another planet. Others, like de Vere, say that they’re multi-dimensional, or that they’re from the Hollow Earth.

Some, like David Icke, say that they are humans inhabited by the spirits of multidimensional reptiles, capable of shapeshifting into reptile form at any time. Still others claim that they were humanoid, but more than human, with pale white skin. The human hybrid offspring that they created as the Royal/Priestly caste was, according to most, the Aryans, who usually had red hair with green eyes – in stark contrast to the traditional Hitlerian vision.

Nicolas de Vere, the leader of an organization called The Dragon Court which claims to represent this royal Aryan caste, writes,

"the depiction of the Aryan (Scythian) as a tall, ruddy-complexioned blonde moist ’ yeoman-farmer-warrior-god has no basis in truth."

He further suggests that the "yeoman-farmer" Celtic, Gaulish and Pictish tribes which we now think of as Aryan were actually of a different race, but had hired the extra-human Aryans to be their leaders.
These Aryans were also the masterminds behind the Indian, Hittite, Greek, Egyptian, Hebrew, Sumerian and Pre-Sumerian Ubaid civilizations. Many believe that their descendants can be found amongst the segment of the population with the RH Negative blood type, roughly 5% of the Earth’s population, most of them Europeans.

These people are often born with:

  • an extra vertebra

  • have a lower than normal body temperature

  • can rarely mate with one another successfully, which suggests that they may indeed be a hybrid species

Conspiracy enthusiast Arizona Wilder takes it a step further by stating:

"The Aryan bloodline is alien to this planet… There are 13 bloodlines from this kind of stock (the Merovingians being one), and all of them have to a greater or lesser degree the capacity to play host to the Shape Changer reptiles."

The other 12 families have been identified as Astor, Bundy, Collins, Dupont, Freeman, Kennedy, Li, Onassis, Reynolds, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Russell, and Van Duyn, with the rest of the European Royal Families being categorized as Merovingian.

These are the people referred to by the fanatical group, the Sons of Jared, when they,

"pledge an implacable war against the descendants of the Watchers, who as notorious pharaohs, kings and dictators, have throughout history dominated mankind.. like super-gangsters, a celestial Mafia ruling the world."

The Book of Enoch says that the sons of the Nephilim, are destined to,

"afflict, oppress, destroy, attack, do battle and work destruction on the earth."

Nicolas de Vere, himself a Prince of the Dragon Blood, sees it quite differently. He sees them as the rightful shepherds of the human flock. He states:

The fairies were tuned to a higher frequency of perception and activity generally. In the past, therefore, because the Fairies were, for millennia, physiologically bred and exhaustively trained to operate at a higher level than men, humans often invited them to become social navigators… A dragon was one who saw clearly, and the clarity of vision engendered was always classically associated with wisdom, which itself produces power….

The Anunnaki and their quasi-human offspring are attributed with remarkable traits. They lived for thousands of years, were capable of levitation, dimension-hopping, clairvoyance, and other magical powers, all a product of applied eugenics.

De Vere explains:

"Selective unions gave the race the opportunity to breed outstanding magicians whose gift of natural perception and understanding and whose ability to access the ’Otherworld’ helped to produce and guide brilliant kings who ruled with elegant aplomb.

The ability to perform magic was carried in the blood and of that blood," and "the Elves were relied upon by their client races to be able to see things and perform feats that these client races couldn’t."

Laurence Gardner, himself a former member of the Dragon Court, concurs:

"hi short, these people were bred to be leaders of mankind, and they were both mentally and physically maintained in the highward state."

But what property did they inherit in the blood which makes this possible?

The experts are nearly unanimous about the fact that the answer is endocrinology. Says de Vere:

"hormonal levels [are] influenced by genetic inheritance and that hormones [affect] the individual’s perceptions, psychological unicameralism and the subsequent ability to transcend and perceive the intricacies of the cosmos. Elven blood [is) rich in these substances."

Starfire bloodfests

"The best blood is of the moon, monthly…" Aleister Crowley, The Book of the Law.

The beneficial effects of the hormone melatonin have been part of the health supplement scene for some time, for high melatonin production is known to be synonymous with a high immune system, a low cancer risk, long life, energy, stamina, and according to many, enhanced spiritual awareness.

Perhaps it is fitting then that this hormone is secreted by the pineal gland, a mysterious little item long believed by mystics to be the "Seat of the Soul," "Me Third Eye," and the organ through which psychic powers are exercised. In fact, it actually functions as an organ of sight in some reptiles, and it still seems to possess some sensitivity to light in higher mammals, since melatonin production increases when the person is exposed to darkness (thus melatonin means "night worker!")

Writes Laurence Gardner:

High melatonin production thereby increases the facility for receiving and transmitting high-frequency cosmic and local broadcasts, and leads to a greater state of cosmic awareness – a state simply of ’knowing.’

In this regard, it is interesting to note that the Pineal Third Eye has been found to contain very fine granular particles, rather like the crystals in a wireless receiving set.

Many magical rites and meditation techniques are aimed at gaining control of this organ and the fluid it produces: the live melatonin.

Rumor has it that the members of the supersecret society Skull & Bones, to which both George Bush and his son belong, engage in a ceremony called "The Obscene Rite," which involves the consumption of the live pineal gland of a human or animal sacrifice in order to get the fresh secretions.

Supplements bought over the counter are ineffective because, as Gardner explains,

"their inherent secretions are obtained from the desiccated glands of dead animals and they lack the truly important elements which only exist in live human glandular manufacture."

Aryan bloodline is alien to this planet… There are 13 bloodlines from this kind of stock all of them have a greater or lesser degree the capacity to play host to the shape changer reptiles.
But the Aryan overlords who ruled over mankind in ancient days had a simpler way of acquiring this fluid. Their ancestor-gods, the Anunnaki, had endocrine systems that produced large amounts of this and other beneficial substances, so they drank it straight from the source: the menstrual blood and vaginal fluids of the goddesses themselves.

This they referred to lovingly as "Starfire" and drank in a ritual ceremony called the Black Mass, after which the Catholic Mass is said to have been modeled. Later, as direct contact with the Anunnaki ceased, the fluids were collected from sacred priestesses referred to as "Scarlet Women," or "Grail Maidens."
Readers will recognize the Scarlet Woman as the Whore of Revelations, as well as the title which Aleister Crowley gave to all of his sex magick partners.

"These sacred, royal princesses" writes de Vere, "virgins of High Birth and Pure Blood, at an optimum age would be chosen to act as feeding females," whose essences contained such valuable substances as, "oxytocin, prolactin, melatonin, seratonin, adenosyne triphosphate, dopamine, telomerase, and retinol."

There is another important ingredient in the mix here. De Vere explains,

"many think that only men have semen when in fact women also have it."

And so a Starfire ritual involves the use of a golden straw.
Stich a device would have been inserted into the virgin’s urethra to the depth of about one inch, whilst the partner in the rite inserted his or her finger into the vagina and massaged the "roof of the mouth" or uppermost wall of the canal nearest the open or ’mouth’ of the vagina, behind the pubic bone.

After a few conducive moments perhaps, orgasm would occur and the fluid from the gland would discharge itself through the straw, either into the waiting mouth of the recipient, or onto a "grail platter" or dish held next to the vulva.
Keen readers will recognize this as identical to a sex magick ritual advocated by Aleister Crowley for members of his Order or Oriental Templars (OTO).

The only difference is that his rite also involved the use of male semen which was called the "Red Tincture" or "coagulated blood," while the female fluids were called "Gluten" or "The White Tincture."

Together they made "The Elixir of Life," and in alchemy blood and semen are the primae materia or first matter of the great work.

*"this is the true Key to Magick," writes Crowley. "That is, by the right use of this secret man may impose his Will on Nature herself."

Monatomic Gold: the substitute

According to de Vere and others, ingesting the fluids of mundane women has only a slight effect, certainly not enough to maintain a royal Dragon family in the manner to which they’re accustomed.

And after a few thousand years the genetic purity of their Grail maidens began to deteriorate, so the Starfire lost it’s potency. This reportedly began around 1960 BC and is equated with the time that an edict was handed down to Noah by God demanding that the consumption of all blood cease immediately. (Gen. 9:4)

Thus, a substitute had to be found, and so the alchemical process was created as a means of artificially creating the Elixir of Life, the Philosopher’s Stone, also known as "potable gold." This is created using a black powder known as occultum, the universal solvent which has the power to transmute metals.

When placed against gold it converted it into a white powder which could be ingested.

It is said to cause nothing less than immortality, as it sets off a self-correcting mechanism in your DNA that lasts for thousands of years. It also bestows the enhanced melatonin production and magical powers associated with Startfire, including clairvoyance, dimension-hopping and flying capabilities. It is believed that this "white gold" is the same as the "Shew-bread" and "Manna from Heaven" mentioned in the Old Testament.

Today, there are those who publicly proclaim knowledge of the Philosopher’s Stone. A man named David Hudson claims to have created a technique for manufacturing this white gold, which he’s patented as ORME (Orbitally Rearranged Monatomic Elements).

Ormus is a name associated with the Holy Grail, and so readers may not be surprised to learn that Hudson himself is related to the Merovingian Grail family through Claude de Guise.

Basically, the powder is created by putting gold into a higher atomic state through a series of intense heating and cooling sessions, during which it loses and gains weight radically, as though portions of the mass were being transferred into another dimension.

David Hudson describes the magical quantum properties of his white gold:

These M-state elements have been observed to exhibit superconductivity, superfluidity, Josephson tunneling and magnetic levitation…

They may enhance energy flow in the microtubules inside every living cell. Ingesting in-state gold has different effects on the body than the effects of ingesting metallic gold. At 2 mg. it totally has gotten rid of Karposi Sarcomas on AIDS patients.

Within 2 hours, their white blood cell count goes from 2500 to 6500…

Stage 4 cancer patients have taken it orally, and after 4 5 days have no cancer left any place in the body. It’s been used on Lou Gehrig’s disease, it’s been used on MS, it’s been used on MD, it’s been used on arthritis. It literally corrects the DNA.

Sympathy for The Devil

All of this puts a nice, friendly face on the whole thing, which is currently a secret power held only by an elite caste of Aryans who use it to lord themselves over the rest of the human population.

And there are those who have said that the "substitute" white gold never did away with the original practice of blood-drinking as a method for obtaining the substances they needed.

David Icke and his associate, Arizona Wilder, have campaigned the globe to inform its citizens with Chicken Little-like hysteria that most of its financiers, politicians and aristocrats are actually under the control of Reptilian beings from another dimension, who are inhabiting their bodies.

Icke states:

"To hold their human form, these entities need to drink human (mammalian) blood and access the energy it contains to maintain their DNA codes in their ’human’ expression. If they don’t, they manifest their reptilian codes and we would all see what they really look like."

Icke believes that most of this blood is obtained in human sacrifice rituals engaged in by the Satanic Illuminati.

He explains:

"From what I understand from former ’insiders’, the blood (energy) of babies and small children is the most effective for this, as are blond-haired, blue-eyed people. Hence these are the ones overwhelmingly used in sacrifice, as are red-haired people also."

His compatriot, Arizona Wiilder, goes into a bit more detail when she writes,

"They have a hypnotic gaze which fixes the victim – in a trance of terror – which promotes secretion of the pineal gland – at that point, they cannot hold human form any longer and begin to shapeshift in anticipation of supper."

Wilder claims to have witnessed Laurence Gardner drinking blood and shapeshifting during a sacrifice at Montauk, New York, as well as a number of others who were transformed during similar bloodfests, including,

  • Bush and his two sons

  • Albright

  • Kissinger

  • Reagan and Nancy

  • J. Rockefeller

  • Ford

  • Carter and LB Johnson

  • Queen Mum

  • Queen Liz II

  • Princess Margaret

  • Charles

  • Tony Blair

  • Prince Philip

  • Zecharia Sitchin

She acknowledges that Starfire rituals go on as well:

In the underground vaults of his castle in the Alsace Region of France, green glowing fluorescent rocks tam stored menstrual blood black to be used at that special ritual. All the British House apparently have jewel-encrusted goblets to drink the blood from the symbolic female grail and a symbolic dagger to give it a bit of a stir.

Some Spencers were at these rituals, but Diana would not attend… the smell of Diana’s periods would have caused Charles to shapeshift – especially whilst sleeping because the reptiles cannot retain their human form without concentration.

This may shed new light on Prince Charles’ reported desire to become a tampon. Aware of these charges, Laurence Gardner and Nicolas de Vere have tried to clear the record.

They’ve acknowledged that vampirism does take place at their rituals, but maintain that they only drink the blood of their own family members, who participate willingly.

"You cannot take the essences by force, they are only given in love," he says, otherwise, "their systems will react by producing chemicals during one’s assault upon them that will completely knock out the chemicals traditionally required."

They claim that vampirisin was originally the purview of a few noble families who practiced it in order to maintain their powers.

"The most famous stories," writes de Vere, "those of Dracula, Bathory and de Rais, support this conclusion."

He and Gardner enthusiastically embrace Dracula as one of their own:

"This Sacred Prince, a Hermetic scholar and initiate, a student of magic, Magus, Witch Lord and Dragon Prince, counterbalanced the bloodlust of his forebears with a refined knowledge and advanced practice of Grail procedure."

This is because he was a member of Sigismund’s Dragon Court in Hungary, and therefore of the Grail blood, who also attended a hermetic academy called the Austrian School of Solomon.

"The orthodox establishment’s fear of Dracula," writes, Gardner, "was not his treatment of enemies but his in-depth knowledge of alchemy, kingship and the ancient Star Fire customs."

As for the claim that they use these rituals to conjure up dragon ancestors from another dimension, de Vere calmly admits that this is the case, and that the participants have their bodies taken over by these spirits, who "rise from the dead to take possession of the witch’s soul!"

He further explains:

Any spirit including the archangels, conjured by the witch or magician was actually the ancestor of the witch… It was carried in the witch’s blood which, the purer it was through the unbroken descent from the Dragons, the stronger would be the return from the ancestors within.

In other words, they brought together and spoke or gesticulated a series of mnemonics that would trigger off precontrived, imprinted states of consciousness that acted as doorways into deeper seats of consciousness.

The charge of Satanism is not entirely refuted either, but de Vere proffers that they are not worshipping Satan so much as honoring one of their forefathers, who they stick right in the family tree along with Jesus, David and the rest.

"The Sabbatical Goat of the Black Mass was Chem Zoroaster," he writes, "one of the early ancestors of the ancient Dragon Families," and, "Satan was also called by the witches ’Christ, son Dei.’ …Jesus’ heredity and the descent of the druidic dynasties… was devilish, because the descent of both bloodlines was from the Sumerian Enki who was the Akkadian Samael: the Roman Lucifer and thus the Catholic Satan."

But the Dragon Court members make no apology for this, because,

"to any intelligent person, to any true seer, concepts like white or black magic or good and evil are irrational, childish nonsense; both in terms of logic and actual fact."

Every Elf for Himself

"This is our Law, and the Law of the Strong. " — Crowley, ibid.

To the charges of "conspiring to take over the world," the Dragons deny that they give two licks what the rest of humanity does with itself.

Their primary concern is,

"the restoration of their own Tribes, their own Nation and their own Homelands…. the foundation of their own distinct society.. re-introducing their old social structures and values."

This results in "The Grail Code," a system of Egalitarian, Chivalric ethics that govern how dragons treat other members of their race. However, "it is not the code that efficiently orders the behavior of the Dragon Families in their dealings with those not of the Grail Blood."

They acknowledge and defend their own elitist attitudes towards mankind, whom they regard as,

"thoroughly stupid and dimwitted, with a clear indication that this condition is genetically inherited."

Whereas in contrast,

"The Elves were naturally transcendent of spirit and their queens and kings were insulated from the common round of nuisances and petty concerns by minds which were bred for deeper matters."

Despite their hatred of humanity, they will kindly agree to be the guardians of our governments again (if they aren’t secretly doing so already), should the population choose to accept them, and offer them the thrones of the Earth, which de Vere and friends indicate are rightfully theirs anyway.

They are just waiting for mankind to realize it again. We will have to deal with the fact that these "Elves" seem to be in possession of a material that bestows long life as well as fantastic physical, mental, and spiritual powers, giving them a distinct advantage through which they are clearly attempting to lord over us, while they allow our populations to wallow in disease, death, and spiritual degradation.

As an excuse, de Vere and Gardner claim that the Starfire and White Gold are only effective for those already of the Dragon Blood anyway, because the rest of us,

"won’t have the right blood serum or the right connections in their cerebral lobes."

De Vere denies the claims of most people who believe themselves to be of this bloodline.

"Some people argue that because of the outbreeding of the old families, there must be millions of people ’of the fairy blood’ living today: but such a statement flies in the face of accepted facts of history.

The genuine old royal families rarely outbred at all, whilst the later, fake parvenu, tinker nobility whom people now confuse with them often did."

So that leaves little hope for you and me of ever obtaining the fruits of this magnificent "Philosopher’s Stone," which "gives youth to the old" and is described as "the summation of the heart’s desire."

And if such a substance were available to the public,

  • How much would it cost?

  • Would it be obtainable by everyone or only the rich and privileged?

  • What if it could be administered for free in the water supply or was available in tablet form at your local pharmacy, covered by your health insurance policy?

  • What would happen to our already exploding population?

As a species, mankind will have to decide how to deal with the information – provided that the information is aired in public someday, and provided our "thoroughly stupid and dim-witted" populace can figure out what to do with it.

Will we take advantage of what could be our greatest opportunity to advance as a species, or will we allow it to be used against us by a caste of Aryan overlords who despise us (and who are literally the spawn of Satan!)

Then again, will we perhaps wish to accept their rule, and the benefits of being led by an advanced race whose powers and insight are greater than our own.

After all, there are those who believe that civilization is created by and can only be maintained by an established elite. Would we want to meddle with that, and allow positions of power to be overrun by inferior men?

Perhaps it is worth considering whether an elite can truly be made by enhancing human faculties, or whether such powers are purely in the blood sources.




Envision every human as equal at birth; in beauty, health, mental health, social strength and intelligence. A designed evolutionary system with goals and planning would provide all of these for every human. Only then can a truly egalitarian society be obtained.

It is natural (ethical, moral, expected) behavior for the human species to modify natural processes to its advantage. As the human species learns more and more about the genetic structure of the human, and its implications in form and culture, it will apply that knowledge (make use of it). To do so is in the nature of the human. Mistakes will be made. That, also, is human. Some will use that knowledge to take unfair advantage of others. That, also, is human. The human will then learn from and overcome from those mistakes and take steps to continuously perfect the application. That, also, is human.

The first requirement for any application of genetic knowledge to the welfare and survival of the species is that each such application be technically justified beforehand. This requires that the application be pretested for validity and tested for adverse side effects. It must then be shown to have a provable net positive effect, with adequate safety margins.

The second requirement for any application of genetic knowledge to the welfare and survival of the species is that each such application be morally and ethically justified beforehand. This requires that the application be pretested for its inherent morality and all social side effects to be evaluated. It must then be shown to have a provable net positive morality, with adequate safety margins. Only then may it be applied.


It was learned from A Basis for Morality Conclusion 2 and Conclusion 4 as directed to the human species:

Since the product of life is survival, normal (expected, natural, moral, ethical) behavior within the human species is that which provides the optimum opportunity for the species survival. Individual or group behavior which supplies less than optimum opportunity for species survival, is perverted (not natural, not normal, not expected, unethical, immoral).

It was also learned from Conclusion 3 that:

The end result of life is the survival of the species (community) as opposed to the survival of the individual. In the natural process of life, the behavior and survival of the individual are subservient to the species welfare.

Considering those two conclusions as provable fact, the following text begins:


Eugenics – It’s a dirty eight letter word in most circles, and it’s been out of circulation for quite a while, but better start getting use to it. It’s coming back. In fact many modern social engineering processes fit directly in even now. It may be given a new name, that’s the way things are done now, like pornographyis now mature or adult, homosexual becomes gay, the masculinizing of the female is calledfeminism, a degenerating social culture calls itself liberal, progressive, modern, politically correct,or democratic, dropping bombs is now called humanitarian, and abortion, with an incredible macabre twist, is now family planning.

EUGENICS: the science that deals with the improvement of races and breeds, especially the human race, through the control of hereditary factors. From Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary

This is a positive definition. It defines eugenics. It says what eugenics is: a science. It says what eugenics is for: the improvement of the human genetic specification. It says how this improvement can come about: through control of the genetic configuration. Read it carefully. The entire future of man depends on this definition.

This definition does not say that eugenics is a philosophy. It does not say that eugenics is a political tool for shaping human culture. It does not say that its functions are determined by imagination, conjecture, philosophy, spirituality, or ideology. It says, instead, that eugenics is a science. It produces real knowledge. It can be measured. It can be verified. It must have a desirable net effect. And, if a particular eugenics procedure does not meet these tests then it must not be used.

Unfortunately, in the past, it has not been a rigorous science, nor has it been used as a positive influence on the welfare and survival of the human species. Most of this has been due to ignorance about genetics, being based primarily on human experience, which is and was quite extensive, with animal husbandry. It works, the theory goes, on selecting and breeding a fine herd of cattle, so therefore, it should work with people. Not so!

The fact that this practice has been misused in prior (ignorant) times does not preclude its possible use today. This past experience does, however, raise warning flags about its use. The human was too eager then to use genetic control processes before they were proven to be beneficial and those processes were applied without sufficient concern about unexpected negative effects on human culture.

The primary concern in the use of eugenics is in the science. Science is based on measurable and provable fact. Scientific knowledge stands on its own proof. Science must not consider dogma (imagination, hearsay, conjecture, opinion, ideology, spirituality, political dogma, etc.) in the applied processes it produces. This concept is diametrically opposed to the modern academic elitist ideology (PC), a secular religion based on emotion. Modern social ‘knowledge’ is based on the conjecturing of the latest pop social author. Most, if not all, modern social ‘knowledge’ is dogma.

Conclusion 1:
Eugenics (genetic engineering) concepts require measurable proof of net satisfactory performance before implementation on the general public.

A secondary concern, one which is secondary in importance only because it should not be an issue unless the first concern is satisfied, is a matter of ethics and morality related directly to the proposed eugenics process.

Conclusion 2:
Eugenics (genetic engineering) concepts require calculated proof of satisfactory cultural ethics before implementation on the general public.

Genetics engineering overlaps with social engineering to the extent that most social engineering processes have an effect on the gene pool. Some social engineering procedures have profound and long term genetic effects. Since the genetic effects of these processes were never considered, most are probably quite damaging, no one knows. The birth control pill provides a change in the ratio of births between the productive and non-productive classes, in favor of the non-productive class. Abortion provides another shift in birth rates between classes, especially between productive and third world countries. Rewarding unwed young, many are juvenile, mothers is a sure way to bias genetic structure toward those who are irresponsible.

Conclusion 3:
There will come a time when we must reconsider a current basic social understanding: that anyone can have as many children as they wish, without regard to their capability for caring for the children and raising them properly, and regardless of the genetic diseases they will pass along to the children, while depending on the community to fill in for their social, physical, mental, and moral incompetence.

Conclusion 4:
The human is now an endangered species. There will come a time when we must carefully examine every social change that we wish to make, to insure that we do no additional harm to the human gene pool.

When viewing the poverty and criminal classes, the social liberal claims cultural malfunction as the cause, rather than genetic differences, and feels that it is the duty of the working successful to provide for those who have been their unfortunate victims. The social conservative points out that schools are available throughout the US, that there are copious help wanted ads in every newspaper, and that no one is tied to a particular geographic location, so it is as much a matter of personal choice as cultural error. Therefore, don’t feed the lazy bums so they will be forced to go to work. "Why should we work two jobs and have our wives work also just to make ends meet while a large portion of our money is confiscated and handed over to people who spend their days shooting pool, drinking beer and making babies?" they ask.

The social liberal then plays the other tune. "These are unfortunate incompetents who need our help to stay alive," they then claim. The liberal conservative returns that if that is the case, we should see to it that there are fewer babies in that bunch so at least the problem won’t grow, a proposal that has to do with species allocation of resources and absolutely nothing to do with genetics.

"Heavens! You sound just like Hitler. What are you? Some kind of eugenics nut?" the liberal then exclaims as he then shifts back to the first condition: that there is no genetic difference between the haves and have nots, so any reproductive restriction would only be cruel.

The facts are that evolution is primarily an individual process. It is the individual and its progeny who experience the mutation. Farmers learned long ago that if a trait in an animal is desired, it must not be allowed to run in the herd. It must be isolated and carefully bred to other like animals. Put a half dozen purebred dogs in a pen for a few generations and there will be only one kind of dog. In a like manner, the human runs free. Any trait in one human will show up in others all over the world and in every class or tribe. Any attempt to adjust genetics through group control would require unbearable restrictions on personal freedoms and severely restrict the intellectual growth of the species.

This is why it so important in our society not to segregate, and favor, certain groups among the able in our social structure. Every able human should be required to work, under the same terms. This requires every able human to prepare itself for work, under equal opportunity. And every social rule should apply equally to every able human. Multiculturalism is the exact opposite in philosophy. It preaches the very social segregation causing our social problems.

Those handicapped in body, mind or criminal inclination, those who are not able to care for themselves within normal society and require public assistance, must be taken care of in the most humane and economical way possible – through institutions. To allow these groups to have more children is stupid, not from a genetics standpoint, but from the standpoint of the welfare of the child and its burden on the producing portion of the society.



It all started with the domestication of animals by the human, perhaps two million years ago. The first was probably the dog, used for hunting, defense, a warning system against predators and other marauding humans, and as a loyal companion. It was obvious from the beginning that if a large dog was needed, it did not come from a small bitch and sire. It didn’t take long to discover that the best dogs came from the best parents.

Then came animal husbandry, perhaps some 10,000 years or so ago. It was discovered that properly selected and cared for animals could provide a consistent source of food and other living materials. Cattle could be tamed and herded and produce milk, meat and hides. Some strains of cattle were better producers than others, some were easier to herd than others. Desirable strains became prized and were carefully segregated from undesirable strains in order to maintain that desirability. It was not long after that, the human found that domestic animals could be cared for without a nomadic life-style, provided food was grown for them. In addition to the animals they could also grow fruit and vegetables for themselves. They quickly selected the best plants available, then carefully selected the seeds from only the best of those. This was a very long time before Mendel.

Then, a long time ago, the human noticed the same characteristics in his fellows. The big strong man with the big strong mate had big strong sons and daughters. Not probably understanding the social implications, they also noticed that the sons and daughters of tribal leaders also tended to become tribal leaders. Royal families came into being. An understanding of heredity, perhaps limited but still a recognition, is not new to the human. Ancient Egyptian pharaohs even practiced incest to keep their blood lines clean. Greek mythology shows some of these same beliefs.

Eugenics, as it is perceived today, began in the last half of the nineteenth century primarily due to the efforts of Thomas Malthus, a preacher and Herbert Spencer, a sociologist. Their primary effort was directed toward the criminal, mentally ill and lower classes, especially those on welfare. They believed that unfettered reproduction by these groups would, in time, degrade the general population. They tended to ignore social conditions and pressures and attributed the failure of these groups to inferior genetics. They were, of course, only partly right. Whereas genetic error can cause these conditions, a large number of these conditions were caused by social pressures. At that time, however, genetic mechanisms were unknown. The DNA was not described until 1954 and the human genome is still being mapped (1999).

Sir Francis Galton, a known scientist, wrote Hereditary Genius in 1869. He described his study of upper class families in which he observed the qualities of intellect. leadership and artistic ability. His work was far more a description of how upper class families furnish superior environments for their children than any study of genetic variation. He professed to show genetic differences between the lower and upper class. He coined the term "eugenics" and called for more children from the upper class and fewer from the lower classes.

Eugenics in the US reached its peak in the pre-WWII period. Many had become convinced that the most efficient way to deal with a number of social problems such as mental illness, poverty and crime was to curtail reproduction in these classes. Involuntary sterilization laws were enacted in many states, mostly aimed at the mentally ill or retarded.

It is with Hitler and the Nazi movement that eugenics became a cursed process. Nazi Germany enacted strong racial hygiene laws in 1933. The Nazi Hereditary Health Courts was formed to review eugenics proposals and approved very many of them. As time progressed they became more and more perverse in their decisions. Euthanasia of the insane and mentally deficient, as well as others judged to be undesirable began. Aryan women were encouraged as a patriotic duty to bear more children and to select Aryan fathers.

Herman J Muller, scientist and Nobel Laurette, spoke out against eugenics as it was then practiced in hisOut of the Night in 1935, saying: "with its present methods and outlook, powerless to work any positive change for the good", "doing incalculable harm by lending a false appearance of scientific basis to advocates of race and class prejudice, defenders of vested interests of church and state, Fascists, Hitlerites, and reactionaries generally," and "the more unequal the opportunities and the conditions of living are, in the society of which an individual is a member, the more largely will his success or failure, his knowledge or ignorance, his mental activity or inactivity, as compared with other men’s be determined by these circumstances of his social and material environment."

Following on from Muller’s line of reasoning: It has become a great fear of many that the most pressing concern raised by advances in genetic testing is that it could cause society to devalue certain individuals because of their genetic heritage. The history of eugenics in the 20th century suggests this is a legitimate fear.

The study of genetics began to emerge after WWII. The nature-nurture argument began. In their widely read book, Heredity, Race and Society, two Columbia University scientists, L. C. Dunn and Theodosius Dobzhansky asserted that, "We come into the world as a bundle of possibilities bequeathed to us by our parents and other ancestors. Our nurture comes from the world about us. What happens to the nurture that comes in depends, however, on the nature that receives it." It was even then becoming obvious to those knowledgeable in genetics, that even the application of the nurture (experience, education, training) depended on the nature (genetically specified mechanisms) of the individual.

Civil rights movements began growing in the 1960s amid growing concerns about racism in society. Those who recognized the importance of genetics in human behavior were forced by public opinion to be cautious. They still are to this day. In a display of uncommon scientific stupidity, modern political correctness (the mantra of the academic elite) sharply criticizes any scientific discovery which might possibly show natural causes for any behavioral difference based on sexual, mental, criminal, economic or racial class. They choose to believe, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that social pressures are the entire cause. Since scientific discovery is from this academic elite class, it is heavily influenced by their ideology, resulting in severe scientific hypocrisy.

The United States Supreme Court overturned anti-miscegenation laws in 1967, and the United States Congress substantially eliminated racist features of our immigration laws in l968.

E. O. Wilson, the eminent Harvard biologist, first wrote The New Synthesis (1975) and later the Pulitzer Prize winning On Human Nature. He said: "Can the cultural evolution of higher ethical values gain a direction and momentum of its own and completely replace genetic evolution? I think not. The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior – like the deepest capacities for emotional response which drive and guide it – is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact".

Comments on the history of eugenics

Rational thinking is extremely difficult on human culture. The bases for all human cultures are not rational. All current human cultures were established by and are based on the irrational – the emotional drives of the human instincts. The most perfect logic fails miserably in its analysis and projection of even the simplest of cultural processes. Human culture is political, with all the subterfuge, sophistry, and dishonesty that term implies. The instant that a single bit of new real knowledge is uncovered by science, it is seized on by one or more political groups, who then twist and turn it to their own advantage.

This is why it is so necessary for humankind to reconstruct human culture, to abandon its current hodgepodge of sub-cultures based on cultural evolution (a cut and try process without goal or plan) in favor of an intellectual culture based on real knowledge, one with real plans and goals.

As the human collective culture responded to knowledge about heredity, that knowledge became politicized. One social group used it to attack another, based on social differences. Eugenics as a science became a torture machine for social inquisitions, and ceased being a science. If eugenics should become a science, and it certainly will, it must not be used as a social tool. It is a tool that may be used by politicos for right or wrong reasons. No process should use the human as a guinea pig. Each of eugenics’ proposed processes must pass the test of moral analysis before being applied. That test is the net effect on the survival and welfare of the human species.

There is no detectable correlation between human construction and human behavior. Many have tried various means such as: shape of the skull, color of skin, lines on the palm of the hand, astrological sign, economic class, IQ tests, conduct, etc. Every attempt leads to as many failures as successes.



Nature once provided man with a cave for shelter. It was not designed for the task, it only happened to be there for our use. It was cold, drafty and damp. Water had to be hauled in from a nearby stream. A trip to the bathroom in the middle of the night often meant wading in the snow for a couple of hundred yards each way. A fire that was warm enough in the cave choked its occupants with smoke. A baby with a bad cold either lived or died. The warmth of a bed of skins was shared with mice and cockroaches. There was some protection from the elements, and for that we were thankful, but it was far from comfortable.

It took a while but the human changed things. We now live in comfortable homes with inside plumbing, electric lights, central heat, air conditioning, a two car enclosed garage, and, yes, a television set.

The human genome which forms us and, through our instincts, guides us, also happened. It was shaped by the elements in the same manner as the cave. It was only partially designed for our task of that time, of living in that cave. Millions of years of trial and error left us with a genome as primitive as that cave, and it is littered with the genetic garbage of all the genetic failures along the way. It offers a living for most of us, but many suffer from its inadequacies.

The human genome was certainly not designed for modern living, and is now degenerating under an evolution which we have crippled. It’s time we took a hard look at that old cave and see if we can bring it up to modern needs.



The sperm supplies a complete copy of one of the two sets of nuclear DNA (nDNA) required for the human. This set may include an X or a Y chromosome. The mother’s egg is much more complex. It also contains one of the two sets of nuclear DNA but it also contains an X chromosome, never a Y. In the new human and starting at conception these two sets of chromosomes, the genome, work in harmony to supply the basic physical and neural pattern. If each cell in the human body works properly, these patterns will result in a human being which accurately reflects the coded specification in the genome.

A human nDNA set consists of 22 chromosomes. The human genome consists of two of these nDNA sets. In the female human both sets are the same, they both carry the X chromosome. In the male the two sets of nDNA differ in that one of the sets contains an X chromosome and the other a Y chromosome. The resulting human is an average between the functioning of the two nDNA sets, the physical and neural differences between the male and female being the result of the averaging between the X and Y chromosome in the male genome.

The egg from the female, however is much more complex. It is a single cell and it carries the mother’s nuclear DNA contribution. This cell also contains the mitochondrial DNA. The mother supplies all of the mitochondrial DNA. The father contributes none. This mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) provides the coded specifications for the construction, maintenance and function of the cell itself. If these function patterns are all proper, the cell is able to properly execute the commands from the genome. The actual production by the cell is determined by its position in the body. It may produce bone mass, a neural signal, blood cells, hair, skin, etc.

Within the nDNA there are function elements called genes. Each gene is the specification for the construction of a particular protein. When a gene is activated, it sends this pattern to the cell in which it resides with the command to produce that particular protein.

Cloning has recently been headline material. The first successful cloning was with sheep. The single set of nDNA in the sheep’s egg was physically replaced with a complete genome from another cell source in the sheep’s body. Since the egg and its mtDNA came from the mother as well as the genome, the newborn was a genetic copy of the mother – a clone. There is no essential difference between cloning a sheep and cloning a human. Cloning a male is much more difficult since there is no male counterpart of the embryo cell in which to transplant the genome from the male. Since that embryonic cell must always come from a female, a true male clone is still some distance away.

A spin-off from cloning is now quite possible. By substituting a genome that is not from the mother into the egg, a hybrid is produced which has the capability within the cell with its mtDNA but with the physical and neural specifications of the genome. Both males and females could be produced this way. They would not be clones of the mother although those features determined by mtDNA would be hers.

This division of features between nDNA and mtDNA provides an interesting and fertile ground for greatly improving the basic genetic structure of the human. Defects in the mtDNA reflect in genetic defects (diseases) which are carried only through the mother. Those could all be eliminated through perfecting the host structure of the embryonic cell (the egg). This perfection process is within the horizon of current knowledge. Such cells could be cultured. The implication is that an idealized embryonic cell could be produced, one which could properly comply with any nDNA instruction and therefore useful throughout the species. Once introduced through intervention, it would become permanent in the genetic process and carried through the mother into future generations in the same manner as now used. The mutation rate is quite slow in mtDNA so a single introduction should be good for a thousand generations or more. Periodic testing could insure the integrity of the embryonic egg within a given generational strain and if found defective it could be replaced by a new one as required.

The current mapping of the human genome has produced many tools that will become quite useful in future eugenics work. Still quite primitive and useful only for very short DNA strings, they nevertheless provide great hope for future manipulation on a much larger scale, even the human genome for example. We are currently able to read a DNA sequence into computer memory. We are also capable of taking a pattern from a computer memory and producing the corresponding DNA sequence.

The implication is that once we understand the functions of the various genes in the DNA and are able to identify those which are defective and cause genetic diseases in the resulting human, we will be able to read into computer memory the genetic pattern of a parent, make the necessary corrections in the computer, then read out of the computer into an nDNA string which can then be used in the cloning process. Once this new string of DNA is introduced, it will propagate through future generations in the same manner as the original would have done. Mutational stability should remain good, even with the normal sexual reproduction process, for many generations. If the string should mutate in future generations, the same procedure can be used again.

Future work will include investigation into the relationships between certain genetic configurations and corresponding physical and mental features. When these relationship are found, birth design catalogs may be composed. Parents may then choose to substitute certain idealized features in lieu of those which naturally occur in their own gene set into a a new gene set which may be utilized in their child. In a like manner, the instincts and moods may be investigated and substituted also. Since ideas of beauty, health and social behavior are relatively universal and uniform among humans and those ideas change relatively little with time, these attributes, once implemented, will need little change in future generations.

Each step in this development of the designer child will be expensive. At the forefront in this development will be those parents who can afford the expenditure and are adventurous enough to commit their progeny and their resources to better their own strain. This, then, is the new intellectual evolution. In lieu of death and misery for all as the tool for human development, the brave and the successful will pave the way while the timid and less successful will watch and wait. The brave and successful will be the guinea pigs that will blaze the trail. No one should be forced to participate. As the process becomes developed, it will quickly become safer and far less expensive. When the process is tried and true, then all should be given the opportunity. Genetic screening and correction should, in time become a standard part of the birth process. Only then will all humankind be truly created equal, by bringing all to the optimum condition.



If the human society survives its current degeneration due to natural evolution long enough, eugenics will be developed and applied, even though no concerted species wide effort is made. It may take an extended time, perhaps 500 to 1,000 years, a significant period in light of the rate of human degeneration. If the society collapses before the underlying causes are recognized and corrected, then the species will become extinct.

Electronics (computers and such) is the current economic growth field. Medicine is also growing at a fast clip. The new field, however, one that will in time eclipse all of these, is molecular genetics. Modified, special purpose, life forms are being developed. Current experimentation includes hybrid biological/electronic devices, biological computer memories and research leading to the minimum molecular complexity for life. Creation of new life forms directly from biological raw (non-living) materials are quite possible in the near future.

The genome project has been enlightening. The human genome is being mapped. Current work on this project carries little resemblance to that envisioned when it started. Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of new techniques, ways of looking at the problem, solutions to problems not even realized before starting, have poured from the inventive minds working on it. But knowing its construction is a long way from knowing the functions within it, and how to correct it or improve on it.

A human culture is capable, when faced with a cause of sufficient importance, of a culture wide concerted effort. Witness the US during WWII and the subsequent cold war. An effort equal in scope to our military since WWII over a similar time period would provide the technical infrastructure for negating natural evolution and correcting the human genetic structure throughout the world, a gift from the US to every living human.

It would be a great adventure, collecting the finest human minds and providing them with the facilities to eliminate a sizable portion of all the ills the human is now afflicted with. We are capable of doing it to kill people, why not do it for the sake of saving an endangered species – us?


Share PDF

Search documents:

Report this document

Download as PDF

Share on Facebook



Generally speaking what that means is that because aliens have contaminated the human genome and tampered with our brains, our world is an expression of the affects that are being created by the reptilian brain.

Our reptilian brains are the part of us that thinks and acts out like reptiles. Think of Jurassic Park here. It is the anger, aggressive, flight and fight center of our brains that act with

out thinking and at the same time is a cunning hunter always watching his pray. This reptilian part of us operates in the shadows. Now of course there is more to the reptilian brain than that but it operates on a frequency, which is very low. The reptilian brain is drawn to rap and rock music, African and Indian Drums and chants. It is the Goth or darker side that dwells with in man. It is the part of us we have to continually keep a lid to make sure it does not get out.

In some cases the reptilian brain will dominant the thinking and behaviours of certain people as they connect to the reptilian frequency. Those using drugs and medications are an example of this.

As we develop as a fetus in uteral we move out of the reptilian form into a human form and our brains attempt to do the same but the control factors of these alien reptilian cloners are hard wired in us; SOME MORE THAN OTHERS.

Once people realize that we all have contaminated DNA and that aliens infiltrated our world and in the process created human hybrids and alien hybrid bloodlines that rule the world today, the reason the world is going down the tubes will all make sense.

When aliens created hybrids they created master lines and slave races. The slave races were known as the INDIAN ADAMS and the BLACK EVES of the world. While the leaders or highly trained hybrid races have come to be known as the

Serpent and Reptilian bloodlines that rule the world today. These bloodlines are hard wired to their alien masters and have what is known as copper based aquatic blood anomalies in most cases. Dean Hammer discovered that this hard wiring to the god or gods is found in their genes. It is referred to as the “God Gene.”

Carl Sagan wrote a book called “The “Dragons of Eden.” In his book Mr. Sagan was looking at the human affects of reptilian genetics in our world. He said:

“You couldn’t understand human behavior with out understanding the reptilian brain. This genetically altered part of our brain is so fundamental that we have become hard wired to reptilians and to the behavior and thinking patterns associated with the way reptilians think and the way they have genetically hard wired us to function.”


The R (reptilian) Factor is so fundamental to who we are that we think it was always part of our human GENETICS’ BUT IT WASN’T. Ancient records and archeology etc., tell us that there was a time when mankind operated here on earth with out the reptilian brain. It was a time when our prehistoric ancestors were gifted beyond belief with talents and abilities we could only dream of today. All ancient cultures talk about these ancestors.

Most of us don’t realize that we are hard wired to the Reptilian Matrix or grid and that we live in a world that is being run by bloodlines that consult with aliens and the DARK SIDE like we check the time on our watchers.