GM Cabbage with Scorpion Poison Coming Soon

JUNE 25, 2013

Agribusiness is in a mad rush to take over the earth, and seems willing to stop at nothing. Coming soon is cabbage with scorpion poison engineered in every cell. Of course, they claim it’s safe and will result in less pesticide use, but history and logic say otherwise. Who will wake from the insane mating between Agribiz and GMOs?

Man with Scorpion

GMO: Agribusiness Puts Us All in Bed with Scorpions. Who Will Wake Up from This Match?

by Heidi Stevenson

Get ready for genetically engineered cabbages that come complete with their own scorpion poison, just for you to eat. It’s touted as requiring less pesticide use and being, of course, completely safe. Close investigation, though, indicates that neither claim is likely true.

A pesticide made with scorpion poison genetically engineered into a virus was first tested back in 1994. Interestingly, the scientists who sprayed the test field wore full body suits to protect them from this “harmless” poison. One must wonder at just how safe it could be when the developers themselves don’t trust it more than that! Of course, the head of the trial, Professor David Bishop, insisted that the trial was safe—though he himself opted to take a vacation, rather than be there for it.

In the newer incarnation of scorpion poison genetic engineering, genes from the scorpion, Androctonus australus hector, for production of poison are being genetically engineered into cabbages. The goal is to produce them for public consumption. With the FDA’s history of rubberstamp approvals for genetically modified crops, it seems unlikely that anything will interfere with their production and entry into a supermarket near you.

Let’s examine the justifications given for this never-to-be-found-in-nature cabbage-scorpion chimera:

1. It will result in the use of less pesticide.

At first blush, this seems to make sense. But it’s specious reasoning. The reality is that, instead of spraying pesticides onto the plants, the plants will contain them in every single cell. The result is that the pesticide will end up in the bodies of people who eat the cabbage. Thus, human beings will become the unofficial pesticide sinks, instead of the environment. I suppose there’s a plus in that, but I do not personally intend to be one of those pesticide sinks. Do you?

2. It’s completely safe.

Where have we heard that before? In this instance it stems from two things:

  • The scorpion venom has been modified so that it won’t hurt humans: This isn’t quite true. What they’ve done is select a section of the genome  that codes for a toxin, called AAiT, which is known to be poisonous to insects.
  • A study that purports to show that it does no harm to humans[2]: Well … not exactly. The human testing was not performed on live people, nor was it performed on normal healthy cells. It was tested on MCF-7 breast cancer cells—not exactly normal human cells. Do you find that comforting? I certainly don’t.
Will Frankencabbages Be Effective At Stopping Pests?

This is, of course, the real issue, because it’s why farmers Agribusiness would want it. That could prove to be a problem. According to the study on AAiT’s toxicity against insect cells, the toxicity is greatly limited by ingestion. The authors wrote:

[L]ow toxicity with an LC50 of 18.4 μM was recorded in artificial diet incorporation assay in which the toxin was consumed by the testing insect through feeding. We suggested that this might be a result of toxin degradation by digestion.[2]

The LD50—the point at which 50% of the insects die—was recorded at only 0.13 μM when AAiT was applied directly. They found a difference of “2 orders of magnitude” when the toxin was directly applied instead of ingested. That’s a huge difference—and would tend to suggest that the scorpion toxin won’t be all that effective in the plants, since it must be ingested by insects. So, in all likelihood, sprays will still be used.

Will this matter to the buyers of Frankencabbage seeds? It’s hard to say, but the history of these products would tend to indicate a remarkable gullibility. Consider that production has never been much better in genetically engineered seeds, and when it has, it’s tended to deteriorate over time.[3] The legacy of Roundup Ready, glyphosate-resistant, crops has been superweeds that not only are resistant to glyphosate, but grow much bigger and faster than the original weeds.

Keep in mind, also, that the use of genetically modified seeds tends to come with codicils that lock the buyer, and even subsequent users of the land, into buying nothing else.

Perhaps, ultimately, it will be the Frankenseeds themselves that destroy Agribusiness! They’re locked into a system that is proving not to work. The real question, then, is whether they’ll destroy the earth—and us—before they’ve destroyed themselves.

The concern posited by the image at the top of the page is serious: Once Agribusiness got into bed with recombinant DNA produce, they made a bargain with the devil. Ultimately, it seems unlikely that even Agribusiness will wake up from their attempt to take over the earth.


Scorpion pesticide test goes ahead: Scientists undeterred by fresh evidence about potency of virus



DESPITE safety fears, scientists in full body suits last night sprayed a new bio-pesticide, genetically engineered and strengthened with scorpion venom, on to cabbages in an Oxfordshire field.

Researchers went ahead with the spraying shortly after it was disclosed that the government committee which had approved the trials had not been fully informed of the risks.

The warning prompted the committee’s chairman to make hurried checks on Friday afternoon with the head of the trial, David Bishop, who is on holiday in South Africa. Professor Bishop said the test is safe, and that the new information does not alter his risk assessment.

The new pesticide includes a virus that infects caterpillars. The extra genetic material from scorpions releases a nerve poison which also paralyses them and stops them feeding, allowing the virus to act more quickly.

The statistics which came to light on Friday are the results of experiments carried out between 1989 and 1993 at the Oxford Institute of Virology where Professor Bishop is director. These showed that of about 100 species of butterfly and moth 75 are susceptible to the virus in its natural form. This is far more species than implied in the material submitted to the Advisory Committee on Release to the Environment (Acre) which approved the test last month after protests from scientists.

Opponents say the virus is not native to Britain. Even if it were not given extra genes, releasing it would therefore be more risky than in an environment where it occurs naturally. The virus is native to California. They say the physical arrangements for keeping the virus from escaping into the environment are ‘laughable’.

At 3pm yesterday, scientists from the institute prepared the site by laying absorbent papers around the young cabbages, planted inside 360 enclosures, to help trap some of the excess viral spray.


Recombinant scorpion insectotoxin AaIT kills specifically insect cells but not human cells

Sheng Jian JI1, Feng LIU1, Er Qiu LI1 and Yu Xian ZHU1

1The National Laboratory of Protein Engineering and Plant Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Correspondence: Yu Xian ZHU, Tel: +86-10-62751193; Fax: +86-10-62754427;

Received 11 March 2002; Revised 18 April 2002; Accepted 20 April 2002.


The nucleotide sequence deduced from the amino acid sequence of the scorpion insectotoxin AaIT was chemically synthesized and was expressed in Escherichia coli. The authenticity of this in vitro expressed peptide was confirmed by N-terminal peptide sequencing. Two groups of bioassays, artificial diet incorporation assay and contact insecticidal effect assay, were carried out separately to verify the toxicity of this recombinant toxin. At the end of a 24 h experimental period, more than 60% of the testing diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) larvae were killed in both groups with LC50 value of 18.4 mM and 0.70 muM respectively. Cytotoxicity assay using cultured Sf9 insect cells and MCF-7 human cells demonstrated that the toxin AaIT had specific toxicity against insect cells but not human cells. Only 0.13 muM recombinant toxin was needed to kill 50% of cultured insect cells while as much as 1.3 muM toxin had absolutely no effect on human cells. Insect cells produced obvious intrusions from their plasma membrane before broken up. We infer that toxin AaIT bind to a putative sodium channel in these insect cells and open the channel persistently, which would result in Na+ influx and finally cause destruction of insect cells.


Scorpion venom is one of the most important tools for scorpions to predate and to exercise self-defense. The effective components of the venom are a group of proteins composed of 30-80 amino acids which possess neurotoxicity1. Ion channels are the main targets for various neurotoxins2. The scorpion toxins can be classified mainly into two major categories according to their sizes and pharmacological target sites: the short-chain toxins composed of 31-37 amino acids and bridged by three or four disulfide bonds that affect mainly K+ channels, and the long-chain toxins composed of 60-70 amino acids and bridged by four disulfide bonds that affect mainly Na+ channels3, 4, 5. The long-chain insect toxins can be further subdivided into two groups: the depressant toxins and the excitatory toxins6. The former induces a progressive flaccid paralysis of insects by blocking the action potentials7, and is represented by BmK IT4, Aa IT5, Ba IT2, Bot IT4 and Bot IT5, Bj IT2, Lqh IT2, and Lqq IT21, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. The later causes an immediate spastic paralysis of insects by inducing repetitive firing in the motor nerves14, and is represented by AaIT, Bj IT1, Bjxtr IT, Lqq IT1, Amm IT, Lqh IT1 12, 13, 15, 16, 17.

The insect toxin AaIT (Androctonus australis Hector Insect Toxin) is produced by the highly toxic scorpion Androctonus australis Hector and is among the first toxins purifieded from scorpion venom. AaIT is an excitatory long-chain toxin specific to insects and is composed of 70 amino acids with four disulfide bridges18,19. The specificity of AaIT to insects was revealed both at the organism level and the tissue level20. Here we carried out in vitro cell toxicity assay to explore the selectivity of AaIT to cultured insect cells. In vitro cell toxicity assay is commonly used in toxicity assessment since it is not only simple, sensitive, economical and homogeneous, but also it has ethical advantages for it is animal-free21. In the current work, we evaluated the toxicity of bacterially expressed AaIT to diamondback moth larvae as well as to cultured cell lines. We verify that the prokaryotically expressed toxin has apparent specific toxicity only to insect cells, but not to human cells.


Materials, strains and plasmids

All chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade purchased from Promega (USA), Sigma (USA), TaKaRa (Japan) or SABC (China). Restriction enzymes, T4DNA Ligase, Klenow fragment and plasmid purification kit were from Promega (USA). DNA gel extraction kit were from QIAGEN (Germany). Sephacryl S-100 HR was from Amersham Pharmacia (Sweden). CellTiter 96®Queous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay Reagent was from Promega (USA). RPMI 1640 medium and Grace’s insect medium (supplemented) were both from GIBCO BRL (USA). E.coli strain DH5a and HB101 were used for plasmid construction, propagation and prokaryotic expression. MCF-7 human breast-tumor cells were stored in our laboratory and Sf9 insect cells (from Spodoptera frugiperda ovary) were kindly given to us by Professor Meihao Hu at our university. The temperature-induced, non-fusion expression vector pBV220, which contains PRPL promoter, was kindly given to us by Professor Zhiqing Zhang22. Insect larvae were purchased from Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. DNA synthesis and DNA sequencing were commercially done by GIBCO BRL (USA) and Shanghai BioAsia Company (China) respectively. Peptide N-terminal sequencing was carried out by our laboratory.

Synthesis of the full-length AaIT coding sequence, construction of cloning vector and prokaryotic expression vector

We designed and synthesized four partially complementary oligonucleotides (A1, A2, A3 and A4) according to the nucleotide sequence reported previously19(Fig 1A), and obtained the entire AaIT coding sequence through annealing and filling (Fig 1B and Fig 1C). Full-length AaIT coding sequence was cloned into pBluescript II SK to produce the vector pBS-AaIT. The identity of the synthetic gene was verified by DNA sequencing and the coding sequence was then cloned into expression vector pBV220. The authenticity of the constructed expression vector pBV220/AaIT was confirmed by DNA sequencing again.

Figure 1.

Figure 1 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact or the author

Cloning of the AaIT coding sequence by bridging the synthesized oligonucleotides. A: four oligonucleotides used to produce full-length AaIT sequence; B: strategy for constructing the toxin coding sequence; C: completed full-length AaIT sequence.

Full figure and legend (47K)

Large-scale expression and purification of recombinant AaIT protein

About 5-6 g of frozen DH5a cell pellets expressing the AaIT toxin were resuspended in 30 ml TN buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5, 150mM NaCl, 1 muM MgCl2) with 35 mug/ml DNase I added. The lysate was sonicated thoroughly. The inclusion bodies were pelleted and resuspended in 20 ml TN buffer. The pellets were washed and resuspended in denaturing buffer [5.6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH8.0, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) dissolved in degassed sterile H2O] by gentle agitation for 6-16 h at 4°C. The solubilized protein was rapidly diluted 1:25 into degassed refolding buffer [final concentrations: 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1m M EDTA, 40 mM DTT, 1mM ZnCl2, 280 mM guanidine hydrochloride, 500 mM L-arginine, 2 mM glutathione (GSH), 1 mM glutathione disulfide (GSSG)] and allowed to refold for 24 h at 4°C23. The sample was concentrated and desalted by ultrafiltration with a 1K Mini-Ultrasette system (Pall Gelman, USA). Insoluble debris and misfolded proteins were then removed by centrifugation (8000timesg, 15 min) and the supernatant was loaded onto Sephacryl S-100 HR resin pre-equilibrated with 0.01 M NH4HCO3. The toxin was eluted with the same buffer. Fractions were collected and lyophilized to dryness. The recombinant toxin was separated by electrophoresis through a 15% polyacrylamide gel and stained by Coomassie Blue.

N-terminal peptide sequencing of recombinant toxin AaIT

The purified recombinant toxin AaIT was loaded onto a 15% polyacrylamide gel and then transferred from the gel to PVDF membrane in a CAPS buffer system (100 mM CAPS, 10% methanol, pH11). The membrane was stained for 3 min in Coomassie Blue R-250 solution (1% Coomassie Blue R-250, 50% methanol, 1% acetic acid) and then destained in 50% methanol till the protein band appeared. Peptide sequencing was carried out on Applied Biosystem 491 Protein Sequencer.

Bioassays of prokaryotically expressed toxin AaIT

The recombinant toxin AaIT was dissolved in distilled water and then diluted consecutively to produce 0.02, 0.2, 2, 20, and 40 mM toxin solutions. Insect bioassays were carried out using early third instar diamondback moth larvae.

Artificial diet incorporation assay. Fresh cabbage leaves were first treated with absorbent cotton to remove the wax present on the surface before being cut into leaf disks (F 1.5cm) and soaked into the toxin solutions for 10 seconds. The leaf disks were then air-dried and fed to the diamondback moth larvae in culture dishes (5 leaf disks per 10 larvae). The assay on each concentration point was repeated for 4 times. The dishes were placed in the light incubator (25plusminus1°C, 16L:8D) for 24 h. Dead larvae were counted at the end of 24 h experimental period.

Contact insecticidal effect assay. The larvae were soaked in various toxin solutions for 5 seconds and were then placed on filter paper to absorb the extra moisture. The treated larvae were placed in the culture dishes and fed with fresh cabbage leaves. The assay on each concentration point was carried out with 10 larvae and was repeated for 3 times. Dead larvae were counted at the end of 24 h experimental period.

Construction of the standard curve for cell number

Various numbers of Sf9 insect cells and MCF-7 human cells (1times104, 2times104, 4times104, 6times104, 8times104, 10times104, 12times104, 14times104, 16times104, 18times104, 20times104 cells) were added to the wells of a 96-well plate, followed by adding the medium (TNM-FH medium for Sf9 cells and RPMI 1640 medium for MCF-7 cells, both containing 10% FBS) to give the final volume of 100mul. The cultures were allowed to equilibrate for 1 h before 20mul /well of CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Reagent was added. After 1 h incubation (Sf9 cells at 27°C in a normal atmosphere, and MCF-7 cells at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere), the absorbance at 490 nm was recorded using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, USA). The standard curve for cell number was drawn with cell number per well on X axis and absorbance at 490nm on Y axis.

Cytotoxicity assays of recombinant toxin AaIT to Sf9 insect cells and to MCF-7 human cells

1×104 Sf9 and MCF-7 cells were added to the wells of a 96 well plate seperately. The wells contained 100 mul either TNM-FH growth media or RPMI 1640 growth media with 0, 0.00026, 0.00052, 0.0026, 0.013, 0.026, 0.13, 0.26 or 1.3 muM toxin added. The plates were incubated for 48 h before 20 mul of CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Reagent was added to each well. After 1-4 h of further incubation, the absorbance at 490nm was recorded using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad). The cytotoxicity assay for each of the two cell lines was done in triplicates.

Expression of recombinant AaIT in E.coli

Upon induction by transferring the culture from 30°C to 42°C, a protein of approx 7 kDa identical to the deduced molecular weight of the toxin was expressed in E.coli strains harboring the plasmid pBV220/AaIT (Fig 2, lanes 2-5). The expression reached its maximum level after 8 h high temperature treatment with no more apparent increase in 10 h (Fig 2, lanes 4-5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact or the author

15% SDS-PAGE analysis of the in vitro expressed recombinant AaIT toxin. Lanes 1-5: cell lysates harvested at 0, 4, 6, 8, 10 h after 42°C induction. Lane 6: protein molecular weight markers (Promega). Lane 7: recombinant AaIT purified via gel filtration.

Full figure and legend (87K)

Purification and sequence identification of the recombinant toxin AaIT

Preliminary experiments showed that most of the toxin produced in E.coli was localized in inclusion bodies (data not shown). The recombinant protein was purified via ultrafiltration followed by Sephacryl S-100 HR gel filtration and was finally lyophilized to dryness. A small fraction of the powder was dissolved in distilled water and was loaded onto a 15% polyacrylamide gel (Fig 2, lane 7). Gel-purified recombinant toxin AaIT was subjected to automated protein sequence analysis. The first eight cycles of an Edman degradation gave the sequence Met-Lys-Lys-Asn-Gly-Tyr-Ala-Val, which was identical to the amino acid sequence deduced from nucleotide sequence (Fig 1C). Though the recombinant toxin starts with an additional Met residue compared with the native toxin, it is unlikely to affect the function of AaIT because it is N-terminal.

Bioassays using prokaryotically expressed toxin AaIT

Very different toxicities were observed as the result of two different bioassays. In the artificial diet incorporation assay, no larvae were killed by feeding leaves treated with solutions containing less than 0.2 muM toxin (Tab 1). By contrast, in contact insecticidal effect assay, we observed significant amount of dead larvae with as low as 0.02 muM toxin (Tab 2). The median lethal concentration (LC50) of the two assays was 18.40 muM and 0.70 muM, respectively.

Table 1 – Results of artificial diet incorporation assay.

Table 1 - Results of artificial diet incorporation assay - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact or the authorFull table

Table 2 – Results of contact insecticidal effect assay.

Table 2 - Results of contact insecticidal effect assay - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact or the authorFull table

Cytotoxicity assays of recombinant toxin AaIT to Sf9 insect cells and to MCF-7 human cells

We first constructed a standard curve to show that there was a linear response between cell number and absorbance at 490nm (Fig 3, inset). The background absorbance shown at 0 cell/well was subtracted from each data point. In the cytotoxicity assay, the cell number in each well was calculated by the absorbance at 490 nm according to the standard curve. The mortality curve was drawn with toxin concentrations on X axis and cell mortality on Y axis. About 50% of insect cells were killed in a toxin concentration of 0.13 muM in 48 h, and all MCF-7 human cell survived even in a toxin concentration as high as 1.3 muM (Fig 3), which demonstrated that the cytotoxicity of the toxin to human cells must have been extremely low.

Figure 3.

Figure 3 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact or the author

Mortality studies of Sf9 insect cells and MCF-7 human cells with different concentrations of the toxin AaIT. Inset: the standard curve showing that the number of cultured Sf9 insect cells functions linearly with the absorbance at 490 nm.(Legend: f9, MCF-7)

Full figure and legend (38K)

We also observed a change in the morphology of insect cells after 48 h toxin treatment. At the beginning of the experiment, both insect and human cells were spherical (Fig 4A, D). However, when toxin was included in the growth media, many insect cells produced obvious intrusions from their plasma membrane as shown in the inset of Fig 4B. These cells broke up into pieces very rapidly with longer incubation time or with increasing toxin concentrations in the media (Fig 4A, B, C). Human cells did not produce any obvious intrusions throughout the whole experiment (Fig 4D, E, F).

Figure 4.

Figure 4 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact or the author

Dosage effect of AaIT toxin on Sf9 insect cells and on MCF-7 human cells. A: Sf9 cells with no AaIT toxin added; B: Sf9 cells treated with 0.013 muM AaIT toxin; C: Sf9 cells treated with 0.26 m M AaIT toxin; D: MCF-7 human cells with no AaIT toxin added; E: MCF-7 human cells treated with 0.13 muM AaIT toxin; F: MCF-7 human cells treated with 1.3 muM AaIT toxin. Cells were all magnified times100 except in the insets which were times500.

Full figure and legend (231K)


We constructed originally an efficient system for the expression of a scorpion toxin AaIT coding sequence in E.coli and carried out three different bioassays to study the toxicity of this recombinant protein. Interestingly, the median lethal concentration (LC50) for the three assays differed by more than two orders of magnitude (Tab 1 and 2, Fig 3). Comparing with an LC50 of 0.13 muM observed in cultured insect cells and an LC50 of 0.7mM observed in the contact insecticidal effect assay, low toxicity with an LC50 of 18.4 muM was recorded in artificial diet incorporation assay in which the toxin was consumed by the testing insect through feeding. We suggested that this might be a result of toxin degradation by digestion. This raised an important question regarding agricultural application of the toxin. According to our calculation, 18.4 muM toxin spread on the leaf surface equaled to 0.04% toxin protein expressed in the leaves (suppose total leaf protein content is 3.0%). This was comparable to the level previously obtained in insect resistant transgenic plants which was about 0.05-0.1%24, 25, 26. Even with a toxin as potent as AaIT, high level expression was still imperative for transgenic plants to show decent insect resistance. In the cytotoxicity assay, the toxin showed higher toxicity with an LC50 of 0.13 muM, which was comparable to the cytotoxicity of Wt-hTNFa to the HEp-2 cells27.

Due to the limitation in the amount of toxin that could be added to the media, we could not obtain an LC50 for cultured human cells (Fig 3). However, it was intriguing to see that 1.3muM toxin had absolutely no effect on the morphology of these human cells while more than 80% of the cultured insect cells were torn and collapsed in media containing the same amount of toxin (Fig 4). The intrusions from the intoxicated insect cells we observed were similar to the blebbing of the plasma membrane observed from wasp venom toxicity studies28. Cohen et al29argued that the disruption of the plasma membrane might be due to other components present in their raw venom preparations. However, here we verified that the purified recombinant AaIT toxin was able to disrupt the cell membranes before killing the cells. Since AaIT showed high affinity for the sodium channel in insect neuronal membranes and no affinity at all for the same site in the mammalian neuronal membranes20, we suggest that AaIT toxin bind specifically to the sodium channel of the cultured insect cells in the similar manner. The binding of the toxin would result in a persistent opening of the sodium channel and the following Na+ influx would cause cell blebbing and collapse due to oncosis. The finding that wasp venom increased plasma membrane permeability to Na+, resulting in cellular swelling and death due to oncosis28, 30, supported our suggestion. In vitro cultured insect and human cell lines may be used to study resistance development and in systemic toxicity evaluation as well.

  1. Moskowitz H, Herrmann R, Jones AD, Hammock, BD. A depressant insect-selective toxin analog from the venom of the scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus hebraeus purification and structure/function characterization. Eur J Biochem 1998; 254:44–9. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Cestle S, Catterall WA. Molecular mechanisms of neurotoxin action on voltage-gated sodium channels. Biochimie 2000; 82:883–92. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Carbone E, Wanke E, Prestipino G, Possani LD, Maelicke A. Selective blockage of voltage-dependent K+ channels by a novel scorpion toxin.Nature 1982; 296:90–1. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Loret EP, Mansuelle P, Rochat H, Granier C. Neurotoxins active on insects: amino acids sequences, chemical modifications, and secondary structure estimation by circular dichroism of toxins from the scorpion Androctonus australis Hector. Biochemistry 1990; 29:1492–501. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Zlotkin E, Eitan M, Bindokas VP, et al. Functional duality and structural uniqueness of depressant insect-selective neurotoxins. Biochemistry 1991;30:4814–21. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Catterall WA. The molecular basis of neuronal excitability. Science 1984;223:653–61. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Zlotkin E, Kadouri D, Gordon D, Pelhate M, Martin MF, Rochat H. An excitatory and a depressant insect toxin from scorpion venom both affect sodium conductance and possess a common binding site. Arch Biochem Biophys 1985; 240 :877–87. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Zhu X, Zhang T, Zhu Y. Cloing and sequencing of two depressant insect neurotoxin cDNAs from Buthus martensii Karsch. Chinese Science Bulletin1996; 41:1387–91. | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Jiang G, Xu Y, Zhu X, Su Y, Zhu Y. Prokaryotically expressed Buthus martensii Karsch insect depressant toxin has insecticidal effects. Toxicon2001; 39:469–76. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Li Y, Tan Z, Ji Y. The binding of BmK IT2, a depressant insect-selective scorpion toxin on mammal and insect sodium channels. Neuroscience Research 2000; 38:257–64. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Borchani L, Stankiewicz M, Kopeyan C, et al. Purification, structure and activity of three insect toxins from Buthus occitanus tunetanus venom.Toxicon 1997; 35:365–82. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Lester D, Lazarovici P, Pelhate M, Zlotkin E. Purification, characterization and action of two insect toxins from the venom of the scorpion Buthotus judaicus. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982; 701:370–81. | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Kopeyan C, Mansuelle P, Sampieri F, et al. Primary structure of scorpion anti-insect toxins isolated from the venom of Leiurus quinquestriatus quinquestriatus. FEBS Lett 1990; 261:423–6. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Eitan M, Fowler E, Herrmann R, Duval A, Pelhate M, Zlotkin E. A scorpion venom neurotoxin paralytic to insects that affects sodium current inactivation: purification, primary structure, and mode of action.Biochemistry 1990; 29:5941–47. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  15. Zlotkin E, Miranda F, Kopeyan C, Lissitzky S. A new toxic protein in the venom of the scorpion Androctonus australis Hector. Toxicon 1971; 9:9–13. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. Oren DA, Froy O, Amit E, Kleinberger-Doron N, Gurevitz M, Shaanan B. An excitatory scorpion toxin with a distinctive feature: an additional alpha helix at the C terminus and its implications for interaction with insect sodium channels. Structure 1998; 6:1095–103. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  17. Gershberg E, Stockholm D, Froy O, Rashi S, Gurevitz M, Chejanovsky N. Baculovirus-mediated expression of a scorpion depressant toxin improves the insecticidal efficacy achieved with excitatory toxins. FEBS Lett 1998;422:132–6. | PubMed |
  18. Zlotkin E, Rochat H, Kopeyan C, Miranda F, Lissitzky S. Purification and properties of the insect toxin from the venom of the scorpion Androctonus australis Hector. Biochimie 1971; 53:1073–8. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  19. Darbon H, Zoltkin E, Kopeyan C, Van Rietschoten J, Rochat H. Covalent structure of the insect toxin of the North African scorpion Androctonus australis Hector. Int J Pept Prot Res 1982; 20:320–30. | ISI | ChemPort |
  20. Zlotkin E, Fishman Y, Elazar M. AaIT: From neurotoxin to insecticide.Biochimie 2000; 82:869–81. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  21. Oliveira JCR, Montes de Oca H, Duarte MM, Diniz CR, Fortes-Dias CL. Toxicity of South American snake venoms measured by an in vitro cell culture assay. Toxicon 2002; 40:321–5. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  22. Zhang Z, Yao L, Hou Y. Construction and application of a high level expression vector containing PRPL promotor. Chinese Journal of Virology1990; 6:111–6. | ChemPort |
  23. Hurt JD, Tu C, Laipis PJ. Isolation and expression of murine carbonic anhydrase IV. Protein Expression and Purification 1998; 12:7–16. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  24. Iannacone R, Grieco PD, Cellini F. Specific sequence modifications of a cry3B endotoxin gene result in high levels of expression and insect resistance.Plant Molecular Biology 1997; 34:485–96. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  25. Kota M, Daniell H, Varma S, Garczynski SF, Gould F, Moar WJ. Overexpression of the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry2Aa2 protein in chloroplasts confers resistance to plants against susceptible and Bt-resistant insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:1840–5. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  26. Huang J, Wei Z, An H, Zhu Y. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of rice with the spider insecticidal gene conferring resistance to leaffolder and striped stem borer. Cell Research 2001; 11(2):149–55. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  27. Lu F, Fang J, Chen C. TNF receptor-associated factor-2 binding site is involved in TNFR75-dependent enhancement of TNFR55-induced cell death.Cell Research 2001; 11(3):217–22. | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  28. Rivers DB, Rocco MM, Frayha AR. Venom from the ectoparasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis increases Na+ influx and activates phospholipase C and phospholipase A2 dependent signal transduction pathways in cultured insect cells. Toxicon 2002; 40:9–21. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  29. Cohen E, Quistad GB. Cytotoxic effects of arthropod venoms on various cultured cells. Toxicon 1998; 36:353–8. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  30. Rivers DB, Genco M, Sanchez RA. In vitro Analysis of Venom from the Wasp Nasonia Vitripennis: Susceptibility of Different Cell Lines and Venom-Induced Changes in Plasma Membrane Permeability. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Animal1998; 35:102–10. | ISI 
  31. ***************************