Disclamer By TRUTHTALK

First off we at TRUTHTALK are not in any way racist against race creed color or your own private sexual preferences That is your individual Human Right and choice. One of our many quote we go by is Live and let Live. with that said ,The Homoxesual Manifesto attack all and everything that is Good , Moral, Heterosexual . Gay Men and Women are being taught by this manifesto, with a clear message of destroying all and everything that is heterosexual is evil. This Manifesto  is breeding Hate period. And that my friends. We do not intend to permit or allow to happen anymore than has already taken place. Quite a bit of the evil from that manifesto is already occurring and is right in your face.  God fearing people of almost every major religions believe that Homosexual lifestyle is evil, ANTI LIFE LUCIFERIAN DOCTRINE It is called SODOMY in the bible and is a sin and always has been. Just because its Politically Incorrect promoters have been making it acceptable to society incrementally does not change the fact that it is a SIN or ANTI LIFE… Just as all there Homosexual community leaders professes this “loving tolerance” they speak of so profusely to mainstream media and general population is just doublespeak bullshit lying propaganda… Just read the manifesto for the real reality of what’s right in front of our eyes. And again this is not every single homosexual person just like most heterosexual people the majority are good honest people. Its the evil masters behind this organization (Rockefeller) at the very top as always is where this evil comes. You can believe there tied right into the AGENDA 21, NWO Agenda. Beware people don’t let them deceive you into hating the wrong people.Remember Homosexual or Heterosexual 90% are good decent human beings.  We must see the head of the NWO snake and make that the target of your anger… Not your gay neighbour

dontvote

Chick-Fil-A and the LGBT Agenda for America

Bradlee Dean
Infowars.com
August 6, 2012

In light of the Chick-Fil-A boycott simply because the owner, Dan Cathy, made a statement in support of traditional marriage, the homosexual lobby attempted to bring on an all-out assault on the company. And when the American people began to stand behind Chick-Fil-A by eating at the restaurant on August 1 Appreciation Day, the homosexual lobby reacted by twittering things such as “Choke to death on that LGBT hating chicken.”

What happened to the “loving tolerance” they speak of so profusely?

This is not the first time the homosexual lobby has shown this type of hateful aggression. For example, in June a federal appeals court said it was going to ignore We the People by declaring it will not rehear arguments on California’s Proposition 8, meaning the final word on the constitutionality of the state’s ban on homosexual marriage will likely come from the U.S. Supreme Court, where Elena Kagan, who is known for “queerifying” Harvard, sits shamelessly on the bench. Can you say, the fox in the chicken coop?

“Coincidentally,” Obama recently came out in support of homosexual marriage and was labeled the first gay president by Newsweek.

To add to this disorder of events, the Department of Homeland Security will honor Secretary Janet Napolitano at the DHS’ gay-themed event called the June Pride Ceremony. The list seems to go on and on.

What is going on? This column may help you see behind the façade.

Friends, the Gay Manifesto was published by Michael Swift in the Gay Community News on Feb. 15-21, 1987. It was also interjected into the Congressional Record (omitting the preface, which I have added below), showing that Congress is well aware of this content.

When the homosexual radicals became aware that people were alarmed by this manifesto, they looked for something to cover their tracks. So they reverted to saying that the homosexual manifesto was merely a “satire” rather than a reality.

Swift’s original preface stated: “This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.”

I lay this to your candor. You decide if this is merely a satire, or if this is actually being played out in reality. (Warning: shocking and offensive content below. Please see my linked video commentary in each section.)

Michael Swift’s Homosexual Manifesto:

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all-male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.

All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions.

We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world.We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

The Gay Agenda

How The Conservative Religious Right Created a Lie

See Also:  The American Family Association and the ‘Gay Nostradamus’

The “Gay Agenda” is but one of the many lies promulgated by radical religious political activists.

The Radical Religious Right has repeatedly referenced an article written by Michael Swift in 1987 at the request of the Gay Community News as satirical “proof” of the so-called “Gay Agenda”.  The article is titled “The Gay Manifesto”.

One of the most notable examples of the religious right referencing this article is the video “Gay Rights, Special Rights”, put out by Lou Sheldon’s Traditional Values Coalition. The video cites it with ominous music and pictures of children.

But when the religious right cites this text, they always omit the vital first line, which sets the context for the piece. In other words, every other version of this found on the net and in the literature of religious right political activists is part of the radical right’s great lie about gay people.

“This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.”

In fact, a “shocked, so very very shocked” congressperson read the article in the Congressional Record in 1989.  Funny thing, though, the opening disclaimer was deliberately omitted.

As recently as 1999, the Miami-Dade chapter of the Christian Coalition circulated a pamphlet called “The Gay Manifesto”, claiming that it was taken from the Congressional record.  They circulated the pamphlet as part of a campaign against a new human rights ordinance.

Funny thing … what’s printed in the pamphlet does not resemble what was written into the Congressional Record.

And the funniest thing of all…. the CC pamphlet just happens to be a direct quote (stolen without attribution) from reactionary CA congressman William Dannemeyer’s 1989 book, “Shadow in the Land”.  Dannemeyer’s “Gay Manifesto” is a complete fiction by his own admission in the book.  It is a paraphrase of what he thinks a “Gay Agenda might be.

It’s time for the religious right political activists to at least pretend to follow the 10 Commandments.  One of them has something to say about lying and another has something to say about stealing.

Source:  Miami Herald, (The Power of Vitriol, Liz Balmaseda 3/10/1999), (Letter to Editor, For Christian Coalition Honesty Is Not Best Policy, Joe Mursuli, Lisa Versace 4/25/1999)

Homosexual agenda

Inside of “Save Our Children” brochure

Homosexual agenda (or gay agenda) is a term originated by some conservative Christians in the United States to describe the advocacy of cultural acceptance and normalization of non-heterosexual orientations and relationships.[1][2][n 1] The term is applied to efforts to change government policies and laws on LGBT issues,[n 2] as well as non-governmental campaigns and individual actions that increase visibility and cultural acceptance of LGBT people, relationships, and identities.[n 1]The term has also been used by some social conservatives to describe alleged goals of LGBT rights activists, such as ‘recruiting‘ heterosexuals into what they term a ‘homosexual lifestyle’.[3]

Origins and usage

Cover of DVD The Gay Agenda: March on Washington

Initial usage

In the US, the term “the gay agenda” was first used in public discourse in 1992 when the Family Research Council, an American conservative Christian group,[4] released a video series called The Gay Agenda as part of a pack of materials campaigning on homosexual issues and the “hidden gay agenda”.[5] In the same year the Oregon Citizens Alliance used this video as part of their campaign for Ballot Measure 9 to amend the Oregon Constitution to prevent what the OCA called special rights for gays, lesbians, and bisexuals.[6] Paul Cameron — co-founder of the Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality in Lincoln, later renamed the Family Research Institute — appeared in the video, wherein he asserted that 75 percent of gay men regularly ingest feces and that 70-78 percent have had a sexually transmitted disease.[7] The Gay Agenda was followed by three other video publications; The Gay Agenda in Public Education (1993), The Gay Agenda: March on Washington (1993) and a feature follow-up Stonewall: 25 Years of Deception (1994). The videos contained interviews with opponents of LGBT rights, and the series was made available through Christian right organizations.[8]

The idea of a homosexual agenda is also used by some Christian critics of LGBT rights in conjunction with a putative ideology they refer to as homosexualism (as opposed to a synonym for homosexuality), using homosexualists to describe people who seek to advance LGBT emancipation.[9][10] The use of homosexualist in this way first appeared in 1995 in Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams’ book The Pink Swastika, “to refer to any person, homosexual or not, who actively promotes homosexuality as morally and socially equivalent to heterosexuality as a basis for social policy”.[11] Lively and Abrahams in The Pink Swastika argue that alleged homosexuality found in the Nazi Party, specifically within Ernst Rohm‘s SA, contributed to the extreme militarism of Nazi Germany, and write about the gay agenda in this context.

[edit]After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the ’90s

In 2003 Alan Sears and Craig Osten, president and vice-president of the Alliance Defense Fund, an American conservative Christian organization, offered another characterization:

It is an agenda that they basically set in the late 1980s, in a book called After the Ball, where they laid out a six-point plan for how they could transform the beliefs of ordinary Americans with regard to homosexual behavior — in a decade-long time frame…. They admit it privately, but they will not say that publicly.[12] In their private publications, homosexual activists make it very clear that there is an agenda. The six-point agenda that they laid out in 1989 was explicit:

  1. Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible(…)
  2. Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers(…)
  3. Give homosexual protectors a just cause(…)
  4. Make gays look good(…)
  5. Make the victimizers look bad(…)
  6. Get funds from corporate America(…)[1]

After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the ’90s is a book published in 1989 by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen.[12] It argues that after the gay liberation phase of the 1970s and 1980s, gay rights groups should adopt more professional public relations techniques to convey their message. It was published by Doubleday and was generally available.

According to a Christian Broadcasting Network article by Paul Strand, Sears and Osten argue that After the Ball follows from “a 1988 summit of gay leaders in Warrenton, Virginia, who came together to agree on the agenda” and that

the two men (Kirk and Madsen) proposed using tactics on ‘straight‘ America that are remarkably similar to the brainwashing methods of Mao Tse-Tung‘s Communist Chinese – mixed with Madison Avenue‘s most persuasive selling techniques.[13]

The article goes on to claim that films such as Brokeback Mountain are part of this “well-planned propaganda campaign”.

Recent usage


Today’s opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct.”[14]


Those goals include universal acceptance of the gay lifestyle, discrediting of scriptures that condemn homosexuality, muzzling of the clergy and Christian media, granting of special privileges and rights in the law, overturning laws prohibiting pedophilia, indoctrinating children and future generations through public education, and securing all the legal benefits of marriage for any two or more people who claim to have homosexual tendencies.”[15]

  • In 2010, American conservative Christian group Family Research Council produced a graphic labelled “Homosexual Agenda” which consisted of the phrases “Innocence”, “Family”, “Local Community”, “Public Health” and “Parental Authority” struck out with red lines.[16]

Responses

A man satirizing the concept of a gay agenda at the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear.

The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) describes the term as a “rhetorical invention of anti-gay extremists seeking to create a climate of fear by portraying the pursuit of civil rights for LGBT people as sinister”,[2] and commentators have remarked on a lack of realism and veracity to the idea of a gay agenda per se.[17][18] Such campaigns based on a presumed “gay agenda” have been described as anti-gay propaganda by researchers and critics.[19][20] GLAAD describes the association of homosexuality with pedophilia or child abuse as an attempt to “insinuate that lesbians and gay men pose a threat to society, to families, and to children in particular.”[2] GLAAD considers assertions linking pedophilia and homosexuality to be defamatory, damaging and entirely inaccurate.[2] Some writers have described the term as pejorative.[21]

In a 22 December 2010 press conference, U.S. Rep. Barney Frank said that the “gay agenda” is

to be protected against violent crimes driven by bigotry, it’s to be able to get married, it’s to be able to get a job, and it’s to be able to fight for our country. For those who are worried about the radical homosexual agenda, let me put them on notice. Two down, two to go. [22]

Satire

A satirical article by Michael Swift which appeared in the Gay Community News in February 1987 entitled “Gay Revolutionary” describes a scenario in which homosexual men dominate American society and suppress all things heterosexual. This was reprinted in Congressional Record without the opening line: “This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.”[23]

The term is sometimes used satirically as a counterfoil by people who would normally find this term offensive, such as the spoof agenda found on the Betty Bowers satirical website,[24] and when Bishop Gene Robinson declared that “Jesus is the agenda, the homosexual agenda in the Episcopal Church”.[25][26] On an episode of The Daily Show, Jon Stewart defined the gay agenda as “gay marriage, civil rights protection, Fleet Week expanded to Fleet Year, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) assistance for when it’s raining men, Kathy Griffin to host everything and a nationwide ban on pleated pants.”[27]

One Million Moms, Ellen DeGeneres, Gay Manifesto & Prop 8 by Jen Shroder Posted Feb 12, 2012

One-Million-Moms.jpg

If you thought America was in a free-fall of moral decline, you should know how valiantly OneMillionMoms.com (OMM) has battled to stop it. This rare jewel is one of the best non-profit organizations standing between your child and a barrage of sexually explicit advertising. Recently OMM took on JCPenney for hiring Ellen DeGeneres, an outspoken lesbian talk show host, to represent this “family values” chain. Ellen then mocked OMM’s Facebook page on her show claiming it has only 40,000 members and referred to them as her “haters.” Enter the fully armed gay community rallying around Ellen, flooding OMM’s Facebook page with thousands of hate-filled posts and worse. CNN jumps in, seemingly congratulating the efforts of Ellen’s audience with claims of surpassing OMM.

Not so fast. I am a member of OneMillionMoms and I didn’t even know there was a Facebook page. We don’t need it, but thanks for the info, Ellen.

Ellen DeGeneres. What a beautiful face to put on a movement that is targeting our children. She’s cute, she’s funny, I don’t hate Ellen. I don’t hate gays. But I do hate that gay rights are used as a battering ram to distribute gay porn in public schools inviting our kids to try gay acts. Just google “fistgate” to find examples.

In California, those who opposed gay marriage by supporting Proposition 8 suffered violence. Maps to their homes were circulated on the internet, paint was thrown, homes were vandalized, the elderly were beat up and lawsuits were threatened against pastors who refused to marry gays. Pastors could either disobey God, step down or let their church be sued into oblivion, exactly what Michael Swift wrote about in his gay manifesto, excerpts below.

But Prop 8 PASSED, in fact opposition to gay marriage has PASSED in every state in the country only to be trampled by activist judges legislating from the bench. Now California waits until the matter is judged by the US Supreme Court. Do “We the People” have any say in our government at all or are we just serfs to have these issues shoved down our throats?
But wait, we have Ellen, to smile and make it all feel good. But let’s look at what “it” is. In 1987, Michael Swift wrote a gay manifesto, published in the Gay Community News and the Congressional Record. LOOK at how far these “desperate dreams” have come to fruition!

“This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor. We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, [how the Boy Scouts have fought] in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, [Don’t ask, don’t tell] in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us…

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men. [Homosexuals are already a protected class].

…We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men [Brokeback Mountain] which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. [Hollywood seems to have a mandatory formula in most screenplays that includes some token of homosexuality even in children’s films].

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. [Can you say California history books per SB48?]

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence–will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants. [Gay adoption, foster homes, child custody cases]

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men..[and so pastors have been threatened with lawsuits, from whom they marry to transgender staff]

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked… [Again, California textbooks]

…Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.”

And so we have trembled. After the violence over Prop 8, how many mothers and fathers wouldn’t LIST THEIR NAMES AND ADDRESSES on petitions to battle SB48, legislation mandating homosexual propaganda in California textbooks. And so it passed.

Gavin Newsom as mayor of San Francisco, ordered his clerk recorder to start performing gay marriages before it was legal. Newsom said, “As California goes, so goes the rest of the nation. It’s inevitable. This door is wide open now. It’s going to happen whether you like it or not. This is the future, and it’s now.”

For some reason, Fox News, Bill O’Reilly, conservative favorites will do nothing to stem this tide except discourage opponents with bogus polls claiming everyone favors gay marriage. With every vote we’ve opposed it! Many homosexual acts are unhealthy. That’s an indisputable fact. To promote these acts to our children is outrageous. One Million Moms has valiantly withstood every name in the book to protect your child from all sexually explicit advertising. I urge you to join. There is no cost and it is one of the few safe ways left to be heard.

Jen-Shroder.jpg

Jen Shroder is a Marine mom and founder ofhttp://www.blessedcause.org, dedicated to restoring sanity to our public schools. Shroder has been interviewed by Fox News, Associated Press, and dozens of talk radio/news media. She is not affiliated with OneMillionMoms except as one member of hundreds of thousands if not millions. OneMillionMoms did not authorize or have any prior knowledge or input of this commentary.

And Now The Evil on the other SIDE of the fence

And then we have the heterosexual Evil Rev Phelps and his Westboro Baptist Church which consist of approx. 80 some members of his own family. Now his basic preaching are against sodomy and directly taken from the old testament and on the right track, This completely Evil Hate spreading Rev Phelps’s train derailed long long ago until now he preaches nothing but hate. So there is evil on both side AND that is the real issue at hand Its all about picking sides. They don’t care which just pick one DIVIDE AND CONQUER Its worked for them for centuries

EVIL FKN SICKO

 

 

Advertisements